Thread: Lens for DSLR
View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 07-12-2009, 09:08 AM
Nicole's Avatar
Nicole Nicole is offline
Super Fantastic Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 9,224
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OsmosisStudios View Post
Y
3: Build. The 55-200 is a consumer-grade lens and, as such, has a plastic mount and is entirely plastic. Controls arent the greatest. The 70-300 is a pro-sumer-grade lens and, as such, is much more solid and has a metal lens mount. It's also heavier, so that may be a drawback.
Although this depends on which version of the 70-300 you're talking about. The 70-300mm G lens (which is the one I have ) is plastic and only about $150. Whereas the VR one is $560 on amazon (and I'm guessing that's the one with the metal mount you're referring to).
__________________
Nikon D90 | Sony NEX-3
Nikkor 18-55 | Nikkor 70-300 | Nikkor 50 f/1.4D | Lensbaby 2.0 | Nikkor 85 f/1.8D | Nikkor 105 f/2.8 VR | Sigma 10-20 f/4-5.6 | Nikkor 10.5 f/2.8 Fisheye | Sony 16 f/2.8 | Sony 18-55 | 2xSB600 | Orbis Ring Flash Adapter
My Flickr
Reply With Quote