I like having zooms for the versatility but I also like primes for sharpness. So here is what I have and why:
Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 widezoom (gives me some great wide angle choices on APS-C)
Canon 17-40mm f/4L zoom (good range for a walk around on APS-C)
Canon 24-105mm f/4L zoom IS (pushes the focal length out a bit more and very sharp glass)
Canon 35-350mm f/4-5.6L (a super-zoom that gives me lots of versatility)
Canon 100mm f/2.8 macro (great prime for macro and portraits and one of the best non-L lenses out there)
Canon 200mm f/2.8L (just a great prime for lots of reasons and great for sports -- sharp, sharp, sharp -- one of the sharpest L lenses available in it's range)
I'll likely get a Canon 400 f/4L in the long term and may even go for the Canon 70-200 f/4L or f/2.8L for a bit more zoom versality but with the 35-350 I'm not in a hurry on the 70-200 (even though I know that the glass will be much sharper than the 35-350). I also plan on getting the Canon 50mm 1.8 or 1.4, since this is one of the most versatile lens around.
Frankly, the biggest factor I see hampering me is having only one body. I plan on getting another body in the future (hopefully near future but not too sure right now) and would lean toward a full-frame over an APS-C body to get fuller advantage of some of the lenses I have. However, I went for good glass first because of a lot of advice on this website.
Like others have said, each of us has different needs. I'm a former reporter/photojournalist (worked as a double-threat man in newspapers for 15 years) and made my lens choices based on that experience. They are choices that others might not make but it works for me.
Last edited by RustySterling; 02-28-2009 at 10:19 PM.
|