View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-20-2007, 11:36 PM
velvet4269's Avatar
velvet4269 velvet4269 is offline
Loves the moderation team!
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: the space between
Posts: 1,140
Default

I would think it would depend on the type, quantity, and size of photos you're printing. Sure, I can spend oodles of money on a big, spendy photo printer, but then you have the additional costs of the paper + the ink (which also isn't cheap) - or I can hop online, upload my photos somewhere, and be done with it in a few minutes to pick them up later, to the tune of about $10-$20.

That said, to do it yourself, you don't have the "upload size" limitations (Seriously, most of my original JPG images are 5MB+), and you don't necessarily have the "odd crop" issue that you would have trying to do it online (case in point: I tried to get a print of this alligator, but he fills the frame in such a way that I'd have to lop off either his tail or his nose (neither of which were acceptable to me; and moot point, because it's really not that great of a photo when you blow it up large anyway)).

I think for as much as I print, and what I'm getting out of it right now, I'm going to have to go "professional printer." I just don't do enough prints to justify the cost of a photo printer.

Of course, the printer my best friend wants is the uber-high end Epson (I think), to get poster-sized prints. He kept trying to convince me that I didn't need a new camera because he didn't have a good photo printer yet
__________________
Olympus E-500 (14-45mm & 40-150mm kit lenses) / Sigma f/2.8 105mm EX Macro DG Lens / Olympus ED f/4.0-5.6 70-300mm Lens / Metz 48 AF-1 Flash / Mandee +1, +2, +4, and +10 Close-Up Filters / SunPak Circular Polarizer
Blog / Gallery / Flickr

OK to edit and repost my photo(s) only in the DPS forums
Reply With Quote