View Single Post
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 10-15-2008, 01:08 PM
wulf's Avatar
wulf wulf is offline
Ninja Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 9,827
Default

It varies with the shot. 3:2 (or 2:3) has a good balance - it is quite close to the "golden ratio", long established as a harmonious set of proportions. If I'm producing desktop wallpaper or a background, I'll have 4:3 in mind as that is still the ratio used by the output systems I am used to. Sometimes I will feel that 16:9 works, for a cinematic feel, or 1:1 (square).

To be honest, I rarely stray outside those proportions (I also normally try to crop to a neat pair of dimensions, like 2400x1800... that probably says a lot about me! ). It frustrates me that my D40 outputs images at 3008x2000 - if I decide to edit the image, I will invariably trim off the extra 8 pixels even if the overall framing is fine!

Wulf
__________________
Wulf Forrester-Barker << Sites: blog / flickr >>
Gear: Nikon D40, Nikon AFS 18-55mm f/3.5 - 5.6G, Nikon Series E 50mm f/1.8, Nikon AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6G, Vivitar 90mm f/2.5 macro, Raynox DCR-250, Lensbaby 2.0k, SB600
Reply With Quote