Choosing a Lens for Wedding Photography – Stepping into Wedding Photography Part 2
Recently Charles Clawson from blog.chaselliot.com wrote a post here on DPS called Stepping into Wedding Photography. Today he follows this up by looking at how to choose the right lens for Wedding Photography. Charles is a Nikon guy so this is reflected in his recommendations for Wedding Photography lenses (although a lot of his advice applies to others also) – but we’d love to hear your suggestions for other brands in comments below also!
Choosing the Right Lenses for Wedding Photography
So you’re serious about stepping into wedding photography, you’ve starting getting experience and your portfolio is growing. Now you want to know what gear the pros are using so you can start building your own formidable wedding arsenal.
The problem is, when researching how to invest that hard earned cash, you get a different answer from as many photographers as you choose to ask. The reason why is simple. There is no perfect wedding kit and every photographer will swear by this lens or that camera body.
Without asserting that it’s the equipment that makes a good photographer, here I hope to present some basic suggestions and let you take it from there. Some of the information I present here is Nikon specific, only because that is what I have experience shooting with. I hope that others will share suggestions in the comments on makes and models not included here.
Choosing a Wedding Portrait Lens
First things first, every wedding photographer needs a good portrait lens.
One of the more technical aspects of portrait photography, and perhaps a new concept for beginners, is the importance of camera-to-subject distance and its relationship with the focal length of your lens. You already know that if you put on a wide-angle lens and shoot your subject up close, it appears enormous in relation to everything in its surroundings. The closer the subject gets to the lens of the camera the more exaggerated this distortion becomes. This phenomenon is sometimes called foreshortening and can be used for some very cool creative effects.
The problem you can run into however is this same effect manifesting itself where you don’t want it. The famous “big nose, tiny ears” look may not go over well with a bride (unless she has a small nose, big ears complex). Even small changes in the position of your camera can change the overall feel of your image.
I came across one scientifically developed study on the topic, which involved showing similar compositions taken at different focal lengths to a sample of reviewers. After filling out a questionnaire on each image, it was discovered that closer portraits gave a subtly more soft and intimate tone, while shots taken at further distance made the subject appear stronger or firm in nature.
There seems to be a sweet spot in which images appear most pleasing to the human eye. So in short, to avoid unwanted foreshortening and achieve natural looking perspectives of facial features or body parts, a good rule of thumb is to try and shoot portraits from a distance of around 3-4 meters or 10-15 feet. (Of coarse when it comes to photography, rules are more like loose guidelines, as you often want to achieve a certain look that falls outside of the norm.)
In order to accomplish this you need a lens with enough magnification to let you stand at least that distance from the subject, but not so far that you have to shout in order to communicate. For 35mm film and full frame cameras, 85mm is often described as the best portrait focal length. Because of the 1.6x crop that occurs with smaller sensor cameras, a small sensor equivalent might be the 50mm lens. This of course all depends on the type of portraiture being taken. Longer focal lengths, all the way up to 200mm are great if you have the room maneuver. Remember, longer focal lengths combined with wide apertures exaggerate the blurred backgrounds that nicely isolate the subject from the distracting background details. Below are a few my personal suggestions. Look for equivalents made by your manufacturer of choice.
Good Wedding Portrait lenses:
Nikon 50mm f/1.8 – US $100
A great lens for an unbeatable price. Every photographer should look into getting this or a similar lens.
Nikon 85mm f/1.4 – US $1000
Considered by some to be the best portrait lens ever made by Nikon. It’s an extremely sharp lens, for both your photos and on your wallet.
Nikon 105mm f/2.8 – US $750
This lens provides a great portrait focal length and has the added ability of taking stunning macro (close-up) shots such as wedding rings, cakes and bouquets.
Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 – US $1,600
Probably the only telephoto-zoom you’ll ever need. Aside from portraits, for events where you can’t get up close and personal a 200mm lens is crucial.
Choosing your walk-around lens for Wedding Photography
As nice as it would be to shoot with only prime lenses, having 3 cameras around my neck with 3 more lenses attached to my belt isn’t really practical and will only serve to intimidate partygoers. Having a high quality zoom lens makes life much easier and you wont miss any shots messing with your gear. Wide-angle zoom lenses, sometimes also called standard zooms, to the rescue.
I find the best lens for wedding photography to be a lens that covers somewhere around the 20-70mm focal length range with an aperture of f/2.8. This ideal range lets you get wide enough to avoid constantly reaching for a dedicated wide-angle lens and close enough to capture facial emotions in your candid shots. It also doubles as a good lens for portraits. In the end, this type of lens is on my main camera 80% of the day. Again, sorry Canon users but here is a short list for Nikonians to research.
Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8 – US $1,700
A new lens to Nikon’s lineup, and replaces the 28-70mm lens. It’s compact, very sharp and has a good focal range.
Nikon 28-70mm f/2.8 – US $1,400
The previous standard for this type of lens. Built like a tank, but almost as heavy as one too. Not quite as wide as the newer Nikon lens above, but a great lens.
Nikon 17-55mm – f/2.8 – US $1,200
This was Nikons first DX wide-angle zoom that has the needed constant f/2.8 aperture. Its angle of view is great and versatility unbeatable. Having used this lens and loved it, the only caution I would give is to seriously consider your upgrade path ahead. This lens will be at a great disadvantage when mounted on Nikon’s newer full frame bodies at reduced resolution. If you plan to stick with the DX sensor, and word is Nikon has more coming down the pipes, this is a must have lens.
Adding Creative Lenses
For the majority of your wedding shots, both photo-journalistic and portrait, the above lenses should have you covered. But as a wedding photographer you need to have a few tricks up your sleeve to get those creative shots that help you stand out from the rest of the pack. These are lenses you won’t use quite as often, but when you need them, they are essential.
First up is a good wide-angle lens to get those cool wide-angle shots. Since your walk-around lens can often go decently wide, it can often be used at its widest setting. But if you want to take it to the next level look into getting a dedicated wide-angle lens. If you have an extra camera body, even an older one, you may just leave your wide-angle lens mounted and grab it when necessary. I prefer the versatility of the zoom lenses, but if primes are your thing there are some great wide angles at the 14, 20 and 24mm focal lengths. Below are two wide-zooms that stand out.
Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8 – US $1,500
Nikon 12-24mm f/4 – US $900
Next in the creative category is a good telephoto lens with a wide aperture. As mentioned above, a nice blurred background can be achieved with wide apertures and long focal lengths. These lenses aren’t only good for blurry backgrounds or shooting events from a distance. I have seen some stunning facial close-ups from creative angles above or below the subject that don’t exhibit the normal distortions of large chins or shrinking heads that come from wider lenses. Below are a few to look into.
Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 – US $1,600
Nikon 80-200mm f/2.8 – US $915
Not as pricey as the lens above with similar quality.
Nikon 180mm f/2.8 – US $750
A solid prime lens and a decent price.
Lastly, used even less often but very cool is the fish-eye lens. The angle of view is simply insane. With a fish eye lens you are able capture images with a 180 degree field of view for stunning special effects.
Nikon 16mm F/2.8 – US $760
Again, insane angle of view and also good in low light situations.
Nikon 10.5mm f/2.8 – US $600
Same as above, this is an awesome lens for DX cameras, but consider your future upgrades before purchasing. All DX lenses shoot with lower resolution on FX camera bodies.
That about sums it up. There are some great lenses made by Sigma and Tamron that match the quality of the big players and cost much less. The resale value is sometimes lower on these lenses but definitely they are worth looking into. Do as much research as possible before making your big purchases by reading formal reviews as well as user ratings.
Feel free to sound off in the comments with your own thoughts and recommendations.


54 Responses to “Choosing a Lens for Wedding Photography – Stepping into Wedding Photography Part 2” - Add Yours
September 4th, 2008 at 12:41 am
The jumping groom gives me the creeps. Aside from that excellent article.
September 4th, 2008 at 2:32 am
Glaring omission of the 105DC f2 for portrait lenses – far better than a 105 f2.8 macro.
September 4th, 2008 at 2:39 am
I used my D60’s kit lens throughout most of my brother’s wedding. What was I thinking! lol. Nicely written article, cheers!
September 4th, 2008 at 4:10 am
I have the 50mm lens, what is the advantage other than different shooting length is the 85mm and is it really worth the $$$ difference?
September 4th, 2008 at 4:33 am
Now- lenses are one of those decisions that really need to be left up to the photographer. It’d be ridiculous to say that “This is the perfect wedding lens.” It’s important to remember what situations and considerations you need to take into account as a wedding photographer. During the ceremony you may not be able to get close to the action, with a crop sensor 85mm is good, on full frame that translates to 135mm. I chose those focal lengths because both Nikon and Canon offer fast primes in those focal lengths. I like primes for their extra speed (wide aperture, F1.4 85mm is my choice prime for weddings.) and quality. Respectively I use my 35mm F2 for a lot of weddings because it is effectively a 50mm on a full frame. The speed (wide wperture) is important because most of my weddings and receptions end up being located in dark areas which may or may not allow flash. I don’t like to go wider than my 20mm lens, but some people like a wider lens for their portfolio- so it all comes back to figuring out your style and budget and coming up with a healthy match. Hope I’ve helped a little… You can see shots on my website (
http://aaronsnyder.net) taken with the Nikon 35mm F2 and 85mm F1.4 displaying the capability of these two wonderful lenses on a Nikon D300 body.
-Aaron Snyder
http://aaronsnyder.net
September 4th, 2008 at 4:53 am
D’oh… What about those of us who use Canon?
September 4th, 2008 at 4:58 am
This is great, unless you shoot Canon, in which case the Nikon lenses aren’t of much use. But good Canon lenses would be:
70-200 f/4L IS USM — will cover the short to moderately long telephoto range, and has great optics
24-70 f/2.8L USM — to cover the normal range
16-35 f/2.8L USM — wide angle lens
As a general walk-around lens that doesn’t command the hefty price premium of the L-series, try the 28-135 f/3.5-5.6 IS USM lens, which incorporates the image stabilization (aka vibration reduction) for hand-holding at slower speeds. Image stabilized lenses are exceptionally useful for shutter-drag photos; if your camera body handles rear-curtain sync, so much the better.
The wide angle zoom, in particular, is good for tight spaces like dressing rooms as well as for exaggerating the train of the wedding dress.
These focal ranges are for a full-frame sensor (like the Canon 5D or 1DS-ii); smaller sensors will have an effective focal length multiplier depending on the ratio of the larger sensor area to the smaller sensor area.
September 4th, 2008 at 5:49 am
@ Noir…. the jumping groom gives you the creeps??? its the cost of all these lenses that freak me out! LOL!
You get what you pay for though…..
September 4th, 2008 at 5:53 am
I just shot my first wedding last month. It’s nice to know that I picked the “right” lenses(a 50mm f1.8, a 70-300 telephoto, and the 18-55mm standard “kit” lens), it would have been nice to get my hands on an 85mm though. Next time.
Good article.
September 4th, 2008 at 5:54 am
In the same category for Canon lenses:
Canon 70-200mm f/2.8
Canon 50mm f/1.8 or 1.4
Canon 17-85mm f/4.5 Image Stabalized USM
Canon EF 24-105 f.4 IS USM
September 4th, 2008 at 7:54 am
I shoot Canon, and only have two lenses right now: the 24-70mm f/2.8L and the 70-200mm f/2.8L IS. I don’t need anything else. If I could add two more, they’d be the Canon 16-35mm f/2.8L II and the Canon 50mm f/1.2L.
September 4th, 2008 at 10:00 am
@ange I wouldn’t exactly replace my 50mm with the 85mm. I have the 50mm f1.4 and the 85 mm f1.4 without a doubt the 50mm is one of the sharpest lenses I own. However, the 85mm just blows it out of the water. Not only is the lens sharper but the color saturation and contrast is unbelievable the 85mm f1.4’s sharpness, contrast, and saturation even runs circles around the 85mm f1.8. Couple the quality with it’s ability to soften any background and you will realize how useful the 85mm f1.4 can be to wedding photography. Furthermore the focal length becomes especially useful far beyond just portraiture providing you can be far away from subjects. I often use mine to shoot street candids… Hope this helps.
-Aaron Snyder
September 4th, 2008 at 10:03 am
I don’t shoot a lot of weddings these days, but I’ve always shot photojournalistic style. (I have a photojournalism background)
And photojournalistic style doesn’t mean candids!
There really is a style to it. You just need, in my opinion, is very wide lens and very long lens. Maybe a 50mm if you are going to be purist about it. Everything else is for everyone else.
Rosh
New Media Photographer
September 4th, 2008 at 6:24 pm
hi.. i would also recommend the Canon 85mm f1.8 prime lens.. it is sharp and fast.. i think it is perfect for candid and portrait shooting.. i think 100mm macro is also great for portrait and you can use it for macro at the same time.. but i think it would be quite hard to use in a small room.. :)
i would also recommend this lens..
17-40mm f4 wide lens.. its not that good in low light but its wider than a 24-70mm f2.8 and i think its quite cheaper than the 24-70mm or 24-105mm.. :) and its still metal.. :)
September 4th, 2008 at 6:50 pm
@Amandalynn – barring your 50mm, your other lenses are not fast enough for a lot of weddings where you need a wider aperture.
And of course, you had backup equipment right?
September 4th, 2008 at 8:57 pm
i have the 50 mm…havent used it yet …doing my first wedding this weekend …also the canon lens kit …75-300mm and 18-55…also a 28-80.,..so if there are any tips you can send me ,,,im on flickr.com look up for acierman let me know what i need to do for tricks …lighting ect….thanks people ..i use a canon rebel xti…i think a rebel xt might be better in dark areas …what do you think
September 4th, 2008 at 11:22 pm
This is really amazing…thanks for the post
http://www.dialac1.deviantart.com
September 5th, 2008 at 12:24 am
I’m doing a wedding for a friend this weekend and plan on using the 18-200 Nikon lens. I’ve used it pretty much everywhere and had great results every time. With the D300 I can shoot pretty much without flash using ISO as needed to get shutter speed, and any noise is readily removed in post processing.
September 5th, 2008 at 4:40 am
All good wedding lenses are Nikons?! Yeah right…
September 5th, 2008 at 8:34 am
Gerry, the 18-200 is a great lens- I use it a lot for events- but it doesn’t give you the nice blurred background that 50mm & 85 mm lens give you with the lower f-stops- perfect for portraits.
September 5th, 2008 at 8:34 am
You forgot to mention the 60mm tilt shift lens, the macro lens and the incredible 600mm super tele. You mentioned just about every other “right” lens that Nikon makes. why did you leave these out?
September 5th, 2008 at 8:43 am
I did my first wedding two weeks ago. My Tamron 18-200mm was a wonderful multipurpose lense and did a great job. I also had a Tamron 200-500mm stationed in the balcony in back of the church and got gorgeous close ups of the ring exchanges, candle lighting, etc. No one knew until I presented the prints!
September 5th, 2008 at 8:45 am
Thanks for the Canon recommendations everyone. Also, keep an eye on the news releases before you make any big buys. Some new lenses are predicted for Photokina in a week or so.
Simo: I never said all good wedding lenses are Nikon. I don’t think you read the article. Everyone has different lens choices so I was just sharing my favorites and hoped others would share theirs.
September 5th, 2008 at 10:07 am
Is there really a differnce on lenses with the same specification but different brand. I’m new in photography I already understand the basic about the camera but not yet on the lens. Upon perusal of the comments it seems that the lens also plays a major part in order to achieve a crispy picture.Presently I’m using a 18-55 lens on my 400d cannon camera.
September 5th, 2008 at 10:19 am
well i played with my 50mm prime lens tonight …its amazing to see how crisp the shots come out …wow
September 5th, 2008 at 11:34 am
My favorite lens for covering weddings is the Canon 200mm f 1.8 but I am sure that the Nikon 200mm f2.0 would work as well from the back pew in a dark church.
September 5th, 2008 at 2:30 pm
Bogart: Yes, there is. But lens plays much smaller role in taking good pictures than one would imagine based on all lens-discussions in the Internet.
Chas: I know I cannot read, but would you then kindly point out where in article you listed some other lens as good lens for wedding.
September 5th, 2008 at 11:13 pm
Thanks for the good info!
September 6th, 2008 at 11:29 am
Is the author a Nikon employee? No doubt, Nikon makes some excellent lenses, but so does it’s brotherly competetor. A better article would describe focal lengths/distance to subject without listing all the brand-name lenses because it really doesn’t make that much of a difference. I’ve shot weddings for friends and am very much an amateur shutterbug. BUT, I took those pictures while aside a contracted pro (three weddings) and all three of my friends kicked themselves for paying for a pro with all of the “pro gear.” Find your own style, your own lenses you’re happy with and go forth and do happy things. Cheers.
September 7th, 2008 at 1:20 am
What is wrong with the Nikon 18-135 perfect for almost everything
September 7th, 2008 at 3:29 am
You sure like Nikon eh? It would be nice if authors were non-biased. No doubt experience with several brands will yield a much more balanced view.
You are correct about range, and that should be the main point. Let users research the lens that’s best for them rather than trying to sell Nikon, or at least present the many other great brands of lenses out there!
Just my 2 cents. ;)
September 8th, 2008 at 12:35 am
While I shoot with Canon, I don’t feel the the article biased Nikon gear over Canon, In reading the article (hint,hint) the author simply stated what gear he was familiar with, Nikon makes good gear as well as Canon, The glass is more important, the photographer the most.
I have had great shots, and I have had shots that “could” have been great, I have never blamed my gear.
Brian
September 13th, 2008 at 5:49 am
For Nikon D700, I have the Nikkor 24-200/2.8 AF-S… ED, but I also want their 70-200/2.8 AF-S… ED, so I went shopping earlier this month.
Salesperson told me NIKON’s coming out with NEW LENSES with better glass and VR in couple of months, so I’m waiting.
September 13th, 2008 at 9:33 am
Thanks for all the comments. I’m glad others shared favorite lenses from other makers. I just happen to use Nikon, thus those are the only recommendations I feel comfortable making. Canon and others are certainly as good.
Most photographers choose a camera maker and stick with it, simply because of the high prices for lenses and accessories. It usually makes little sense to switch from one brand to another to get the “next big feature”. Competition demands that camera capabilities of one brand will catch up and continue to have similar feature lists as the next sooner rather than later. My advice, don’t waste money jumping ship to quickly.
I agree with Brian and live by the adage “A craftsman never blames his tools.”
Chas
September 13th, 2008 at 12:59 pm
Ann- I looked all over the internet for the 24-200/2.8 lens, including Nikon’s site…it doesn’t seem to exist…is that a type-o and if not, where’d you find it? That would be the perfect lens…
September 13th, 2008 at 1:28 pm
Yikes, it absolutely was a typo, or the 18-200 DX I have for D200 partly slipped out.
The full-frame lens that not only exists, but I have, is the Nikkor 24-70mm/2.8 ED, which is why the 70-200 is next lens I’m aiming for. I promise that the info I got from BH salesperson about new lenses wasn’t a typo, though :-)
September 14th, 2008 at 1:06 am
Is it possible for them to make a lens with that much range (24-200) and still keep a 2.8f stop? If so I would be BUYING THAT LENS! What lens did they say Nikon was coming out with soon?
September 14th, 2008 at 1:35 am
When I was at the store, I was asking about a specific Nikkor full-frame VR lens (70-200/2.8), and he asked if I did photography for hobby or living. Then he said, as best I remember, “Nikon’s coming out with new lenses in a couple of months with better glass and VR, so don’t buy lenses now.” So, I don’t really know if he meant that Nikon’s coming out with complete new line “all at once.” Perhaps he felt that info was more relevant because I was asking about expensive lens, and said I didn’t have unlimited money. (BTW, in case I wasn’t clear above, the D200 lens I was referring to is Nikkor AF-S VR 18-200/3.5-5.6.)
September 14th, 2008 at 1:38 am
Yeah I have the 18-200, but I don’t use it much since it doesn’t have the low fixed f. stop.
September 14th, 2008 at 1:44 am
Yes, Ange. I do think it’s a very handy lens when you’re only taking one camera and need the range, but it isn’t great at either extreme end.
September 15th, 2008 at 9:20 pm
Thanks for the informative article, I’ve found it very helpful.
Where do Nikon users think the newly announced 18-105mm VR sits amongst these recommendations?
Admittedly it’s not f/2.8 but the Vibration Reduction has a lot of plus points, no?
September 19th, 2008 at 8:19 am
Juilan, the 18-105mm is a good all around lens, especially on bright overcast or sunny days. The shortfalls are shooting in low light situations and achieving that shallow depth of field with the blurry background, two things you really can’t do without if photography is your profession. I use my 18-200mm VR though anytime I take my camera on trips.
Chas
October 22nd, 2008 at 11:03 am
hat is too cool. I’m just learning about photography and photography lenses. I see stuff like this and realize what a huge world is out there in this area. I’m trying to capture some of what i’m learning as I go. Thanks for the great ideas and inspiration. Derrek
November 8th, 2008 at 2:05 pm
Anyone ever use the Tamron 90mm f/2.8 macro lens for portraits? The DOF is incredible and the bokeh you get blows the 105mm away.
Anyone using it?
Thanks!! Ü
November 8th, 2008 at 10:18 pm
well i use canon …i have the 50mm prime lens ..70-300mm canon lens ..the lens i got with my camera …and all i can say is that the 50mm prime gives the most crisp and clear shots i have ever taken …ok ..you can do nice shots with any lens …but for crisp …..the 50 is awsome ..and i also have a couple of sigma lenses …so i guess it depends on the user …i know that my prime is awsome …now im gonna get a 85mm prime …im not a pro …far from it ..but i do like taking pictures …i suck at weddings …but i figure with practice …and all the input from this great sight …i will be improving every day …thanks guys and gals for all the comments i get here
January 26th, 2009 at 5:43 pm
I’ve done Asian wedding shoots for over 30 occasions now (as a hobby), I ‘m using Nikon D300 with 50mm / 1.8 and Nikkor AF-S VR 18-200/3.5-5.6 .. (thank God my old D70 has a replacement now haha)
i’m eyeing for a faster f2.8 lense 17-55/ 18-50mm Tamron.. and wide angle too like Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8 and Nikon 12-24mm f/4 … but then on the other hand , we all know the market is moving to full frame DSLR (it’s not a choice either with Technology evolving so quickly!).
Hence , my recommendation would probably be prime lenses . Cheers!
February 15th, 2009 at 4:02 pm
Which lens do you use the most during preparation (indoor), ceremony (outdoor or indoor) and reception (indoor)?
February 16th, 2009 at 1:53 am
The 24-70mm 2.8 wins in almost every situation. Times it doesn’t:
Really dark inside during preparation… I’d switch to a prime lens. 1.8 or even 1.4.
Ceremony requires I be further from the action, switch to 70-200 2.8
Reception shots aren’t as critical. Put on your creative lenses and experiment when you can.
Chas
May 5th, 2009 at 8:42 am
Great article … it gave me a lot of answers that i was looking for … i have a question tho … I was thinking of a combo (the 50mm f1.4 for the portrait part and in the church where light conditions are rather dim and you don’t or can’t use a flash … and for the all-around lens the 18-105 mm VR … don’t mind using the flash at the party etc. … as my budget is a bit low … ) or the 16-85mm VR at about the same price as the combo … which would be best for this kind of photography ? i would really appreciate any comments …
Cheers and thanks again for a very good written article !
July 8th, 2009 at 12:36 pm
For Canon lover
I’m using :
17-40L F4
24-105L F4 IS
70-200L F4 IS
for wedding and general
Superb IQ
September 13th, 2009 at 8:00 am
what about the 18-200VR II? It seems to cover everything, and with the D700 you can crank up the ISO to 1600 or 3200 with great results so the f/5 sluggishness is not a big deal.
September 13th, 2009 at 12:51 pm
@James: The 18-200 lens is nice but it’s a DX lens. Using it on a D700 reduces your resolution. It also lacks the larger f-stops to give nice bokeh/blurred backgrounds.
October 16th, 2009 at 2:45 pm
Hey Chas I did a search on google and the first one I found was ur profile , luck me ur comments are AMAZING!! I just got a bit confused now: With slr NIKON CAMERA DO I HAVE TO BUY?IF I would love to have these lenses:
http://www.cliftoncameras.co.uk/Nikon_85_mm_f1.4D_AF_Nikkor
http://www.cliftoncameras.co.uk/Nikon_70-200_mm_f2.8G_ED-IF_AF-S_VR_Zoom-Nikkor
http://www.cliftoncameras.co.uk/Nikon_10.5_mm_f2.8G_ED_DX_Fisheye-Nikkor
Thanks
November 2nd, 2009 at 6:01 am
Did those of you complaining about it being a Nikon based article read that the author specifically uses a Nikon, and that Canon comments were welcome? It was the first paragraph!
In any case, I am a Nikon user, and shot my first wedding for a friend using two lenses. My 35mm and my 18-135mm. I used the 35mm for the flowers, the rings, and some other detail oriented items, but found that my zoom lens was on the camera mostly. I really thought that I was going to use them the other way around. (35mm more for the portrait style pics etc) I love shooting for friends. In these cases, they are unable to pay for photographers, so before all you professionals get huffy, that is why I shoot for them – it was me, or nothing. This happens often for me, so not only for myself and my hobby, but for these situations, I want to get a better lens. Choosing has been tough, to say the least. There is so much out there, and without physically trying them out, I do not know which one to get! :) I am thinking a zoom up to 200mm. More research is afoot…
Leave a Reply