The following is a continuation of a series of questions with a Pro Photographer.
I am a Canon nut and always have been (it goes back to my film days when I invested way too much money in Canon lenses).
I shoot with a Canon EOS 1D Mark II as my main camera but have more recently invested in a Canon EOS 5D as a secondary camera (it was a spur of the moment thing and something I get a little grief about from other photographers who think its a little to amateur - however I love it).
Two lenses stay on my cameras almost exclusively (although I have quite a few others). They are the:
Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS - while I used to use the 24-70mm f2.8 L lens I upgraded to the 24-105mm option because I wanted the extra focal length and image stabilization. While I miss the f2.8 range I find that the IS more than compensates in most cases and the extra reach that the lens gives me makes it a lot more useful. Plus if I really need the extra aperture I can switch to my other lens.
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS - this lens is amazing. I do a candid/photojournalistic style of portrait photography and this gives me the reach to create intimate images without my subjects feeling intruded upon. It also gives a nice narrow depth of field (lots of blurry backgrounds) and is one of the sharpest lenses I own.
The other lens that I’m falling in love with is the Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM Lens which is super sharp and amazingly sharp. I prefer having a zoom on my cameras for my more candid style shots but if I have more time on my hand and am going for a more formal/posed shoot the 85mm is great.
Other Gear
what equipment would you recommend for a less professional photographer and a much much lower budget???
like, i’d love to get the 70-200, but that’s just too way out of range for me.
thanks
Why the 24-105… I would have the 17-40 F4L as well as the 70-200 F2.8L and that covers pretty much anything
from my experience the 17-40 is great for the wider end but I personally usethe 40-70 range a lot for portrait work which you’d miss with just a 17-40 and 70-200mm…. having the 24 right through to 200 is a nice range.
Also the 24-105 is image stabilization which gives an extra couple of stops which is very very handy.
hi! i’m also thinking of getting a walkaround lens since i only have the kit lens now. I was thinking of the 24-70 f2.8 L but when i saw your article, i am now confused. a couple of questions - i know that f2.8 is really fast in low light, but can the f4 IS compensate for it? in what circumstances do you have the f2.8 advantage?
Thanks!
mike, there is an advantage of f2.8 when the subject is moving. this is because you can use a faster shutter speed. Where as is and f4 IS lens, you can take a shot hand held using a slower shutter speed which means that it works only for rather still subject. the bokeh is also more than f4
I have the following lenses: EF-S 17-85 4-5.6 USM IS, EF 24-70 2.8 L USM (no IS), EF 70-200 2.8 L USM IS, and of course, the inexpensive and impressive, EF 50 1.8 II.
I WISH the 24-70 had IS! I am a bit frustrated with this lens for the money I paid for it. Don’t get me wrong, it’s a great lens, but you need decent light and steadier hands than mine or a tripod. I’ve been spoiled with IS on my “kit lens” (17-85). I think I’m going to keep the 17-85 as my “walk around” lens and use the 24-70 as my studio lens. I was hoping for less stuff in my bag, but I guess it didn’t work out that way. Good thing I ordered a larger bag!
The whole reason for this rant was to respond to Mike Lao’s post above. If I had it to do over again, I would probably get the 24-105 F4 USM IS. I’m not sure what the cost is of that though!
The good thing is…is you take care of your lenses, they hold their value VERY well! Especially with the “L” series.
Enjoy!
J.Simonian
hi, I am just moving from the point-and-shoot to the dslr world and I have a few questions.
I am getting familiarized with the kinds of lenses and to the cameras, but there is an entire world of accessories that I don’t know, e.g. polarizer filters, lens hoods, battery grip, etc.
Could you make an article that summarizes the kinds of accessories that exist for dslrs and the purpose for each one of them?