Don’t Forget to be Human
I remember this phrase from a tutorial that I read when I got my first camera: “you are looking at person, not your camera”. It can be really easy to turn into a robot with your camera just an extension of your mechanical parts, especially when you take photos for a living. Don’t forget that you are a human and so is your subject. For the purpose of this post, I’m not even going to call them ‘subjects’. A tree is a subject. Today, we’re talking about humans. I have actually just gone back through the entire post and substituted the word ‘subject’ with the word ‘human’ and it felt surprisingly uncomfortable to do so. And you might feel uncomfortable reading it. I really feel that it’s highlighting our discomfort with taking the technical and substituting it for that which is human and we should embrace that feeling because it will drive us to be better and do better.
{In the Viewfinder}
When you look into the viewfinder, do you see the exposure meter and focusing plane or are you looking at your subject? I often get humans asking me why I’m looking for so long before I ‘click the button’ or why I move the camera around when I’m looking through the viewfinder. It takes a surprising amount of confidence to take your time taking photographs of human beings. You can look at a landscape for ages, but do you have the guts to stare into a person’s soul through the viewfinder for an uncomfortably long time? Don’t just shoot quickly to get it over with. Take the time to check whatever technical details you’re looking at through the viewfinder and then start actually focusing on your subject (focusing with your heart, that is).
{Personal Space}
My first proper photo shoot was with a young engaged couple. And boy was it hard! I felt really invasive and almost apologetic for getting into their personal space but those images will always hold a special place in my heart.

You have to allow yourself to connect with your human’s heart. Be empathetic. Feel their feelings. I know in an instant when a subj…oops…human is feeling uncomfortable. Sometimes I ask if they are, sometimes I just change location or position. I once read a tip before about giving your humans something to hold. It takes their focus off of themselves and gives them something to do which is exactly what I did with this couple and it worked a treat.
{Feedback}
As a photographer, you must be confident and remember that they have asked you to take their photo which usually means that they already like you. And most people think they’re ‘not photogenic’ and ‘can’t take a good photo’ and if they’re a bride & groom, you can expect them to be even more antsy at times. They are looking to youfor their confidence.
Give them good feedback. Steer away from the stereotypical “work it, baby” (unless you’re going for laughs). I always say things like “that’s great”, “you look great”, “yes do that again”. Take the voices out of their head telling them they’re awkward or ugly or standing funny and replace them with your positive feedback. Tell them that what they’re doing might feel strange, but looks great on camera.
I’m really struggling to come up with anything more to say at this point. I can’t conjure up any more sentiments other than to say ‘don’t forget to be human!’




18 Responses to “Don’t Forget to be Human” - Add Yours
December 9th, 2009 at 7:22 am
I agree, you have to be human with the people you are working with. I believe part of the job of the photographer is to not only be able connect with the individuals you are photographing but to do so in a way that can draws out and capture their personalities & characteristics. In order to do that, they must feed off your example and be relaxed so they can just be themselves.
December 9th, 2009 at 9:15 am
I think you said it well. Being a good photographer means not only producing images your clients enjoy, but an all around enjoyable experience as well. I have a number of key words, expressions and I’ve even broken out a mask or two to bring emotions out in people. Your repertoire with the people you’re photographing can go a long way to producing better photos.
December 9th, 2009 at 10:18 am
I like the last part of your sharing, give them positive feedback. Ya, i strongly agree that many people think that they are not that photogenic BUT they do have a good smile or expression on their face. Sometime i even can feel their happiness, share their feeling after we snapped the photo. The only thing is, i am not that professional to capture their natural look, and feel sorry for doing so.
Still got a long way to learn and improve…
December 9th, 2009 at 1:39 pm
That photo of the young engaged couple is really beautiful!
December 9th, 2009 at 4:25 pm
Don’t forget to human, but don’t also miss a photo opportunity.
Look at the works of the masters – Dorothea Lange for example. You can’t always respect personal space when making a point (about poverty). I’m not saying she was ‘disrespectful’ to her ‘models’ but she didn’t try to make the truth looks more appealing. Same goes to the ‘war photographer’ – James Nachtwey.
I had a post about street photography and personal space – http://www.ilanbresler.com/2009/08/sunscreen.html – The post evolved into an interesting debate in the comments.
December 9th, 2009 at 8:32 pm
I completely agree.
Personally i admit, i am little shy around taking photos of other people, so that is why i often practice on my pets. They don’t mind me taking photos, but they do seem to have a short attention span.
Anyway, my point was, pets can help you until you figure out lighting, focusing and other settings, so you can take that out of the equation when shooting people.
And the only thing coming out of these animal tests are a bunch of cute looking furry animals .
December 9th, 2009 at 9:19 pm
I find a simple 5 minute meditation on all the important people in my life before a shoot really brings the human side into a session.
December 10th, 2009 at 12:25 am
Great advice, but this really pin points why I don’t enjoy taking shots of people. Maybe some candids, but once they see the camera its over. I don’t have the patience to look at them through the viewfinder that long. I feel like I’m an inconvience to them and I just need to hurry up and take some shots and be done. Maybe I’m just not confident enough, but to me people seem to be really hard to capture nicely. Great advice though and I really love that shot of the young couple, that is gold!
December 10th, 2009 at 6:48 am
I well thought article with great advice! I have long hesitated to do portrait photography because it demands the cooperation of another person to do well. Being human us great advice!
December 10th, 2009 at 9:48 am
A tree is an OBJECT.
A person is a SUBJECT.
It’s minor, but that’s the whole point of the distinction between subject and object.
December 11th, 2009 at 12:57 am
Yeah, I have to agree with j guy. At the least instead of finding/replacing subject with human, rewrite it so that it sounds like normal English. “your human’s heart” is an extremely awkward and creepy turn of phrase – subject sounds much better in this context and given your sentence syntax. That phrase sounds like you’re holding a human heart in your hand. It’s much more offensive to my ears than subject (which j guy points out is not pejorative). If you want to avoid ‘subject’ perhaps you could substitute something like ‘person’ or ‘someone’ instead.
The primary reason I’m saying this is because, to me, your use of human is more objectifying than how you perceive using subject. It sounds like you’re an alien teaching her class to ‘be careful of your human’s heart’ or ‘know when your human is uncomfortable’- like they are growing or owning or grooming human beings.
But that’s just me.
Oh, and I did enjoy the article.
December 11th, 2009 at 2:17 am
@duluk: Thanks for reading and taking the time to respond. Your response highlights exactly why I used ‘human’.
EXCERPT:
“I have actually just gone back through the entire post and substituted the word ’subject’ with the word ‘human’ and it felt surprisingly uncomfortable to do so. And you might feel uncomfortable reading it. I really feel that it’s highlighting our discomfort with taking the technical and substituting it for that which is human and we should embrace that feeling because it will drive us to be better and do better.”
December 11th, 2009 at 2:50 am
hello beth! this is very interesting article!! well done!!
fyi, we shared the same interest in photography line that captured humans but am still new of course.
so do visit my flickr site to leave a comment
feel pleased bout dat..thanx
December 11th, 2009 at 4:32 am
Perhaps Duluk has a hard time with your wording because English is not his first language. If so, he should be made aware that non-English speaking people often create odd sounding English phrases, because they translate English words, with their own language’s syntax. Sometimes with hilarious results.
We generally overlook the words, and try to understand the meaning. It would not hurt Duluk to do the same.
As you said, people often say things like, “Oh, I don’t take good pictures!”, when what they mean is, “I don’t look good in the pictures that have been taken of me.”
When folks tell me they “don’t take good pictures”, I always joke that they’re not taking them, I am – and I ALWAYS take good pictures! They usually have a laugh, and relax, which is THE most important ingredient in good pictures!
I like your style, Elizabeth, keep writing.
December 11th, 2009 at 4:47 am
And if Alan Graf thinks animals have a short attention span, he MUST give children a try!
December 12th, 2009 at 4:41 am
@Elizabeth – Sorry, I don’t agree.
I don’t believe seeing ‘human’ instead of ‘subject’ made me feel uncomfortable because you were “taking the technical and substituting it for that which is human.” I do agree with the point of your post. I do believe we should remember that we are taking pictures of human beings. My problem is with the phrasing because unlike halmooney’s ridiculous implication, I’m very familiar with the English language and very sensitive to it. My problem was (and is) with the way ‘human’ was used given your sentence’s syntax – not because you were trying to “make it human.” Even though I don’t believe ‘subject’ is necessarily pejorative or cold – though I can understand someone feeling that way, I have no problem with removing its use. I never implied or suggested you use subject. I in fact suggested the opposite – that you rewrite the sentence so that it sounds like English. I understand you were probably intentionally leaving the awkward phrasing to make your point – I believe we disagree on why it was awkward.
@halmooney – You’re funny. I’m not really sure how to respond to your accusation that English is not my first language, nor exactly which phrase or concept in my previous comment would lead you to assume that. I wasn’t translating English according to some other fictional language’s syntax. My whole point was how her use of human was creepy given the English syntax of her English sentence. And I, probably because I’m much more of a writer (mostly poetry) than a photographer, do not “overlook the words.” The words are everything.
December 12th, 2009 at 1:41 pm
Then Duluk, I offer my humblest apologies.
December 13th, 2009 at 6:26 am
I agree that you can’t forget the human element when taking the subjects picture. I have just recentl finished capturing my first wedding. I didn’t realize that I was doing this, but every time I took a picture that turned out I would say things like “beautiful”, “very nice”, or “you look great in that pic” and it not only got others doing the same thing but gave me more business and the images turned out beautiful.t
Leave a Reply