Balance in Photography
One compositional ‘rule’ (principle) that we’ve not talked much about since starting DPS is ‘balance’.
While it’s a difficult thing to be specific about (it’s not like the Rule of Thirds where you can identify key spots on an image by imagining lines through it) it is a compositional factor worth considering when framing shots.
Perhaps the most effective way of learning about balance is by looking at photos that don’t have it.
We’ve all taken them – shots with strong points of interest on one side of an image and ‘emptiness’ in another area.
I’m not talking about symmetry – images don’t need to be the same on each side – but sometimes images can be improved greatly by having a secondary point of interest counter balancing the main focal point of an image and providing those ‘empty’ spots with a little weight.
Achieving Balance in shots is something that photographers learn over time. The best way to learn it is to scan through some of your older images, looking for those that could be more balanced.
Of course each situation will be different and getting balance in your shots might be achieved by a variety of techniques including:
- cropping (sometimes some post production processing will achieve a lot)
- altering your shooting view point (shooting from higher up or lower down
- zooming (more tightly cropped or wider angles)
- moving an element of your picture (sometimes scenes can be rearranged)





28 Responses to “Balance in Photography” - Add Yours
March 20th, 2007 at 8:49 am
“Perhaps the most effective way of learning about balance is by looking at photos that don’t have it.”
This is a great topic for a post. Perhaps a little more show (i.e.: more photos as per your statement) would help cement the concept into the brains of newbs (like me).
Thanks – the site is awesome.
March 20th, 2007 at 9:53 am
I find it very useful to look at other’s pictures, not just good (or great) photographers’ pictures, but lots of pictures. Then critique them – both the good ones and the bad ones. Find what you think makes each of them good or bad. Look for that magical ‘balance’, pose, lighting, cropping or ‘??’ that makes or breaks the picture.
County and State Fairs are a great place to see a variety of pictures, all (most) amateur photographers. Some of the pictures will be great, some make me wonder about the ability of the judges. I try to look at each of the images that don’t turn me on, and try to figure out why, and what I’d do to turn it into a picture I’d be proud of. I also look at the ‘good’ pictures and try to figure out what it is about it – which ‘rule’ was broken, which ‘rule’ was followed that makes it a good one.
March 20th, 2007 at 3:00 pm
I agree that this is a great concept to talk about, but it would be very helpful if you could provide a couple of examples and comment on them.
March 20th, 2007 at 4:34 pm
feel free to add some links to some flickr images that you think are balanced – or not balanced.
March 20th, 2007 at 9:41 pm
With all of the above in mind, I would really appreciate getting your feedback on some of the “training photos” that I’ve taken in the last few weeks such as http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/gallery2/main.php/v/jmcp/Photo_Training/20070317_153710__MG_3052.jpg.html and http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/gallery2/main.php/v/jmcp/Photo_Training/20070310_121438__MG_2939.jpg.html in particular.
March 24th, 2007 at 1:48 pm
I say that your first training photograph is balanced perfectly. the orange on the right and at the bottom of the photo frame the shot. The diagional part of the image is just about ecactly in the center of the image.
March 24th, 2007 at 1:56 pm
Your second training photograph is also well balanced in my own opinion. This photo is not balanced 50/ 50 like the first training photo, it is more like 40/ 60, because it is balanced by the road that cuts through the photo.
I think that the land and water are in proper proportion to each other.
March 28th, 2007 at 3:15 pm
hey there !

this pic is mine
hehe
i donpt get to understand the point, are you saying this pic is not well balanced? :O
as i am an amateur photographer i would love to know why
is it because of the white letters?
thanx a lot !!!!
March 29th, 2007 at 4:49 am
i agree that balance can create a wonderful feeling in a picture. here’s one i’ve found that i think illustrates having two focal points to balance things out.
that being said, i don’t think it’s one of those make-it-or-break-it sort of rules. here’s a shot that i think doesn’t agree with your rule, yet it works very well for me, mostly because there are other “rules” at work (in this one, as i see it, it’s a pattern being broken that makes it so interesting).
and, as others have mentioned, this post seems a bit unfinished–is your example balanced or not? the original photographer would like to know that as well. do you have examples of unbalanced pictures for us to see? a comparison would be nice.
great site, btw…i’m a regular lurker.
April 12th, 2007 at 6:20 am
Juris is a very uncommon name. I thought there was noone with my same name around. If you have this James R. Juris’ email address still that wrote you above write him and let hiim know that our names are almost the same except by one initial. I would be interested in meeting him if he is interested. THanks for checking it out.
James
May 1st, 2007 at 12:33 am
At a critique session of my club , I was told that my photo of the reflection of the suns rays on the ocean would have been enhanced if there was something else in it, like a boat. I was impressed by the beauty of the scene. Would there be need for balance in this case
May 8th, 2007 at 3:31 pm
There is a noticeable difference between photos with good composition and those without. I mainly do wedding photography and this probably applies to all photography but Depth of field is huge. Pictures with only one focal plane get boring unless they have great colors. Thats my opinion anyway…
July 20th, 2007 at 7:01 am
This issue is often one I remark on in critiques. The phrasing I use is “weighted”. Having a wider/thicker/heavier subject on one side of an image and a lesser sized subject on the other has a tendency to make the horizon appear unlevel. It may not be so, but the “weight” of elements can give the perception that there is a definite “lean” in the photo.
October 25th, 2007 at 11:03 pm
i dont understanb how balance works in photography i thought that objects had to exactly the same on both sides
October 31st, 2007 at 3:33 am
e-Nikkos, I think that it is not balanced, because the yellow is so bright in comparison to the rest of the picture. (I think…)
February 17th, 2009 at 3:12 am
I think the main point of balance is making sure the foreground, background and main subject are all balanced. I think it will be best understood by balance with regards to the negative space assignment. Just my opinion.
September 25th, 2009 at 11:35 pm
Could someone post an imbalance photo please, this would be most helpful. thanks
October 30th, 2009 at 1:59 am
I agree – the article would be a lot more substantial with some actual examples and a discussion around them.
That said, I completely agree about reviewing your past work – I notice for example how much less I crop images in post production these days compared to a few years ago. The cropping process taught me a lot about how to think about the final image before pressing the shutter button!
October 30th, 2009 at 5:01 am
If everyone is to just post a picture and have others comment on the supposed balance, why not post this in the forum? This is hardly a tutorial at all. Balance is most definitely shown best with examples, and leaving the examples out of the tutorial sort of sucks the learning out of this post.
October 30th, 2009 at 5:04 am
I’ll give it a try.
Here are a few that don’t appear to well balanced.
-

-
This one is a tough one. Several people have told me it’s not “centered” well. The tree in the middle is “Off” some say.
-
October 31st, 2009 at 5:53 am
This is a fascinating discussion. I think actually the last photo is quite well balanced – the balance is made up of the hut, the tree and the shadow cast by the tree which is out of the frame. I think balance is about interest and direction as well as about weight. Just my opinion. Great post anyway.
October 31st, 2009 at 6:55 am
Thanks.
I’m one of those people that say’s “I like it, therefore, it’s perfect”.
Art is subjective at best, so we shouldn’t put to much in “Theories” or “Rules” (which ARE made to be broken), and in what others think.
Input is VERY helpful, at least to know what people think , and for help in getting better, but use it as a guideline.
Do what you want, when and how you want … if it makes you happy.
Thanks again for the positive comments. Most people have said it’s to bad I couldn’t have taken the photo without the tree in the middle of the field? Like what, I’m going to go out there and cut it down?
Skip
October 31st, 2009 at 10:51 pm
i agree – the yellow comes out of the primary photograph long before the other colours – i can see balance but only after the other two colours come into focus.
November 2nd, 2009 at 1:26 pm
Balance…..
http://www.flickr.com/photos/iamcesur/3693304633/in/set-72157621036020666/
December 16th, 2009 at 6:04 am
I looked over some old work, that was very helful, thank you.
June 16th, 2010 at 9:52 am
These tips and pages (focal point, Balance) would be vastly more helpful if there were a lot more examples. It’s like writing about music (or dancing).
dm
September 13th, 2010 at 7:00 pm
Is “out of balance” the same thing as saying “move to another position” ? Because that’s what I see in these images. Take a few steps to the side and it’s fine…
September 14th, 2012 at 7:57 am
i wish there was more info on this page it’s self….
Leave a Reply