3 Minutes with Photographer Joseph Szymanski
The magical aspect of photography is that it so effectively channels an infinite number of perspectives, interests and styles. With this in mind a deeper or second look at a photographers work can often reveal something to a viewer that may be subtle or mysterious. One photographer whose style and subject material builds off of such subtleties and mystery is Joseph Szymanski who specializes in dark moody black and white photography. Take special note of Joseph’s consistency and philosophical approach to learn an often elusive aspect of photography that gets lost in a lot of technical discussions… personal vision.

What gear/software do you use?
I’ve been working exclusively with 35mm Leica rangefinders for some years now. I typically carry two bodies, one with a 50mm and the other with a 35mm lens, along with a 24mm lens in the bag. Just recently I’ve also been working with a twin lens 6×6 Minolta Autocord. My film of choice has always been Kodak Tri-X 400. I’ve always worked primarily in black and white and rarely shoot any color. I occasionally use an orange filter to increase contrast, and from time to time a red filter to darken up the sky. Other than that I’m a bit of a
minimalist, I don’t like bells and whistles.
Describe your photography in 100 words or less.
My work tends to be a bit dark, though I don’t believe it is necessarily dark in nature. A great deal of my images focus specifically on light and shadow, and the shapes of things I find on the street. I often find that content is almost secondary, at least in my own mind, though it is of course often an important element in my photographs. I suppose my work is really about memories, places, and pieces of things along the way. For me, it’s always been the way I chronicle where I’ve been and what I’ve done.

What’s one quick tip that you’d give people getting into street photography to help them improve?
I don’t think there is any one tip that can improve your work. The best thing for someone starting out is to keep shooting, always carry a camera, but remember to take your time. Always be looking at good work, inspiration is a constant process. Remember that well thought out photographs take time and effort, and quality is always more desirable that quantity.

What 3 Photography Sites or Photoblogs do you Recommend?
Magnum Photos is by far the site I visit most. It never fails to deliver, and is one of the greatest archives of photographic history on the net.
Alt.blog is another one of my favorites. I can’t read a word of it, but the imagery is consistently impressive, the photographs speak for themselves.
I also like to keep up with the Center for Fine Art Photography site. They always have interesting shows and exhibitions they’re putting together in a wide variety of styles and mediums.
View more of Joseph Szymanski’s work at http://www.josephszymanski.com




16 Responses to “3 Minutes with Photographer Joseph Szymanski” - Add Yours
December 7th, 2009 at 4:56 am
Is it me, or are none of those images very sharp?
December 7th, 2009 at 5:39 am
you are right, they are not.
so is not this one. one of the most appreciated pics in the history
http://www.allposters.com/-sp/Derriere-la-Gare-Saint-Lazare-Paris-Posters_i2879842_.htm?aid=861354
not every picture must be sharp to be The Picture.
I am not necessarily saying the pictures above are fabulous (depends on anyone taste), I would just not reduce commenting the picture on the sharpness.
December 7th, 2009 at 10:48 am
I agree too that the images are not sharp.
December 7th, 2009 at 12:44 pm
To me the picture choice seems very uninspiring, they look boring, especially for nowadays. Don’t think I would take the advices from a person with such portfolio etc, no offence intended! Hope to see more inspirational work
December 7th, 2009 at 6:27 pm
Who said photographs should be sharp? Or in focus? Or contain the full tonal range from pure black to pure white? Or be composed according to the rule of turds (sic)? Free you mind and your art will follow!
December 8th, 2009 at 1:24 am
@gino
Photographs don’t have to follow the classic rules but they should be interesting. Most of the above are not. I used to take snapshots like these when I just got my first camera. This is pretty much the first photo I took (besides to the usual family/party-photos) and even if it sounds arrogant, I think it’s better than all of the photos shown above.
December 8th, 2009 at 1:36 am
In addition to what Joseph advised, I’d say shooting from the hip has been the best way for me. I just like the shots better, but that’s my taste. I’d recently shot New Yorkers watching the Veteran’s Day parade like that and it gave me pretty good results.
http://www.emonhassanphotography.com/new-york/how-new-yorkers-watch-a-parade/
December 8th, 2009 at 3:25 am
Funny I should say that none of the pictures look any great unless someone connect some kind of incomprehensible art sense to it. They look very ordinary. The wow factor is missing in all of them
December 8th, 2009 at 8:22 pm
This photographer is great, you would learn a lot of photography techniques from him >>>
http://photography.dustindiaz.com/
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2488/4145947305_37b536a148.jpg
December 11th, 2009 at 3:52 am
Images not sharp?
That’s hilarious. That’s not even an argument. Quit learning about your camera and start learning about photography. Don’t think that knowing technicalities means you’re experienced, and making such a irrelevant comment proves you’re not. Concept is king. Photos aren’t worth crap if you can’t deliver the concept of it to the audience at first glance.
People these days use technical knowledge to offset the lack of conceptual skill.
December 11th, 2009 at 4:43 am
As I’ve said before, if you cut all the pictures from a book of great works by the masters of photography and matted them up for a showing (without telling anyone where they came from), most of the folks who viewed them would be able to tell you all kinds of things that were wrong with them.
A photograph is a work of art. It should stand as such.
The more accomplished one is as an artist, the less one feels obligated to criticize another’s work.
December 11th, 2009 at 11:21 am
True photography is about the image.. and less about the technical stuff. Some of the best photographs are made with a manual camera, while other a completely technically correct and tack sharp and totally UNinteresting. But that defines the difference between photography/photographers and “camera enthusiasts.”
December 14th, 2009 at 5:58 pm
I do not get the point that you have to be out of focus or break rules (knowingly or unknowingly) to create an “Art”. Frankly, Tac-Sharp doesn’t necessarily means a great picture (or Art) but lack of sharpness in all three pictures looks odd to me. The pictures would stand much better if they were a bit sharper or have some clear subject.
I am not going to debate on the “Art”, “Imagination” things as they are very subjective. But evidently not everyone (being polite) considered these pictures worthy. When you can’t see the beauty of an Art at first (or after several) glances and have to use some kind of unknown Imagination, then I will focus on something else.
December 17th, 2009 at 4:18 am
Emon Hassan…Your photos are wonderful. I was very impressed with the way they seem to speak something about the person in the photos, and you can almost feel yourself being there. You should be very proud of your work.
February 7th, 2010 at 12:46 am
This photographer’s work is extraordinary in capturing mood and feel. Everyone on here to thinks your focus needs to be sharp makes me want to puke. Grow up.
February 19th, 2010 at 5:13 pm
nice! i wish i could be a better photographer! hope u can give me some advise..
http://www.ezraphotography.blogspot.com
http://www.aipye.multiply.com/photos
Leave a Reply