Why Prime Lenses are Better Than Zooms

35mm - SoHo Fire Escapes.

35mm – SoHo Fire Escapes, NYC

How heavy is your camera?

If you have an SLR with a zoom lens attached, the answer is pretty damn heavy. A large SLR body, such as a Canon or Nikon with a 24-105mm lens attached feels like a tank; forget the 70-200mm.

Of course there are many situations when using a zoom lens is ideal. However, I’m hoping to try and convince you to ditch the zoom lens for a prime.

But what if I need the zoom? What if I don’t have the perfect focal length? – I have heard those questions more times than I can count. A wise photographer once told me that you will get the same amount of good shots no matter what lens and camera you use; they will just be different. Zoom lenses can be just as limiting as prime lenses, and prime lenses can be much more freeing than zoom lenses.

By walking out the door with a single prime lens, you are limiting yourself. There are certain shots that you will not be able to capture, that is a fact. However, the benefits can far outweigh that single negative. Prime lenses cause you to take more time to compose your shot, since will you need to zoom with your feet. This can make you think more critically about your composition. A prime lens will free you up to focus on the subjects in the range that the prime lens works best at. You will become much better at finding things within that range and your work will be more consistent because of these limitations. A prime lens makes you think in a certain way, since it is tougher to use. The limitation ends up being an advantage in the long run.

35mm - Cast Iron Building, SoHo

35mm – Cast Iron Building, SoHo NYC

Think about how many famous photographers throughout history used prime lenses.

Prime lenses are lighter. They make your camera more fun to take out. You don’t need a heavy camera bag and you will be able to walk further, explore more, and capture more images. You will have a bounce in your step that you didn’t before. You will be able to bring your camera with you on a daily basis. That will more than make up for missing out on a few shots that a zoom lens could capture. Photography will become more fun! It will become more of an element of your everyday life, versus something that takes planning to do.

After awhile you will learn to see specifically in that focal length, and this is where things really click. It will almost feel like the camera isn’t there. You will be faster and more intuitive as a photographer. This is all because you ditched the zoom in favor of the more limited prime lens.

Oh, and did I mention that prime lenses are cheaper than zooms? Any money that you will spend purchasing a new prime lens will be saved in medical bills from your neck and back eventually giving out from the weight of that gigantic zoom lens that you use now.

35mm - Fire Hydrant, SoHo

35mm – Fire Hydrant, SoHo NYC

So what focal length should you choose? I prefer a 35mm lens (on a full frame). It is just wide enough to work well anywhere but not too wide. Other common focal lengths are 28mm, 50mm, and 85mm (which is a fantastic focal length for portraits). Rent a few lenses and try them to see what you like best.

After a few days of using a prime you may realize that the real limitation was with your zoom lens.

Read more from our Cameras & Equipment category

James Maher is a professional photographer based in New York, whose primary passion is documenting the personalities and stories of the city. If you are planning a trip to NYC, he is offering his new guide free to DPS readers, titled The New York Photographer's Travel Guide. James also runs New York Photography Tours and Street Photography Workshops and is the author of the e-book, The Essentials of Street Photography.

  • DV

    Personally, I really enjoy prime lenses for the fact that I can choose a project to shoot at one focal length and figure out how to make it work. I also like that when I shoot, when I move to a subject, I stay at the same aperture unlike a zoom that closes the aperture as you zoom in. This is just my preference. I agree with the previous arguments that with certain wildlife, it is too dangerous or to skittish to shoot with a prime. That is why I have some zooms on hand for that. Every piece of equipment has it’s place. We as photographers just have to discover our style and be smart with our equipment choices. Great shooting to you all!

  • Hi Sabra – thanks for the comment! Both prime and zooms are great and can be necessary. As I mentioned, zooms are necessary for many situations and bird or animal photography is one of them. Using a zoom does not mean you are lazy at all. I use my zooms a lot.

    This article is more about how primes do a better job for many photographers at training their eyes, getting used to a specific focal length, and allowing them to see in different ways. From experience, I find that using a prime lens focuses photographers more, particularly when they are learning.

    The weight issue is a big one though. Walking around for a day with a light prime is much easier than with a heavy zoom. Yes, some prime lenses are heavy, but those are the F1.4s that are very specialized.

  • Thanks for the comment Bob. Happy to hear you’ve had that experience with them!

  • I do love the 35, but 50 is amazing as well! The 50mm 1.4 or 1.8 are incredible lenses, for both quality and the price.

  • Hey Linda – I agree with you, they definitely both have a place and their advantages.

  • Hi Johan – yes for situations like that you need a zoom. The constraints of a prime wouldn’t work here.

  • Hi Mali – a 50mm 1.8 can go for $100.

  • Happy to hear you had that experience with it Mel and fantastic self portrait. Gorgeous!

  • Thanks Skinner – I definitely agree with you on this.

    I don’t see this so much of a debate as of thoughts of when to use each and how they can each be beneficial, since both zooms and primes can be great to use. But I still stand by the statement that primes can do a better job of teaching people to see in a different way, more consistently, and to improve their photography more, and that the constraints actually turn into an advantage. Except for bird photography. 🙂 And they’re lighter!

  • Hi Gaurav – I did not say that I thought a zoom lens makes someone a lazy photographer. I said that the constraints of a prime can actually turn into an advantage in many situations and to help photographers to think more consistently.

  • Sloppydog

    I’m relearning, getting a passion for photography again, mostly for travel, so I find these discussions interesting. I looked at getting an SLR, but opted for a FujiI x100s. I still have to learn how to use it properly in manual mode, but I’m still managing to get some great shots. (and some absolute duds as well) I just have to train my eye to notice details when framing shots. I love that it is so portable for travel and I don’t mind moving around to get a good shot. However I can see advantages of zoom lenses as well, but for now I am one happy chappy enjoying the experience of a fixed lens.

  • Remi Zagari

    Thats interesting

  • Michael White

    Hi James! I am preparing to enter the FF world myself, with my present camera being my trusty Nikon D90. Frankly, I find strengths and weaknesses with both prime and zooms, and look at it based on what I’m doing and can afford. Yes, you can zoom with your feet. But believe me, when I photographed that Western Diamondback Rattlesnake last year, I really appreciated the long end of my 70-300mm zoom! I love to shoot wildlife, but sometimes you have to remember that it is WILD life. No matter how I try to sweet talk it, it won’t pose the way I want! 😉 For now I hope to start in the FFworld with some primes, and add some zoooms later. Best Regards…

  • CandiEdgsonimu

    m­y Aunty Brook­e got Mitsubish­i Gal­ant jus­t b­y part-time w­ork fro­m a macboo­k a­ir… v­isit here>BIG TIME PAY

  • Mark

    The whole point is you don’t replace the zoom with every focal length of prime, you simply don’t need to. The 24-70 could be replaced with a 24mm, 50mm, and 85mm just like Darlene states. The article wasn’t about that though, it was about shooting with 1 lens and how it makes you approach things differently when that one lens is a prime. It is about seeing things differently, moving outside your comfort zone and trying something different. It is not about the prime v zoom flame wars. To each their own.
    Zooms have improved greatly but primes will still give you wider apertures and better image quality. My 85mm f1.8 stills beats my vastly more expensive 24-105mm f4 L. If I’m taking portraits of the kids then the 85mm or 50mm prime gets used. Were I taking a once in a lifetime trip somewhere then it’d be a high quality zoom.

  • Mark

    Er, aren’t Canon’s main wildlife lenses the 300, 400, and 600mm very expensive primes? It certainly isn’t the 100-400 f4-5.6.

  • Mali John

    My camera is Olympus PEN E-PL3. Cheapest I’ve seen is 60mm Sigma for $209. 19mm for $199.

  • Marcos Loyola Rivera

    True story. They are sharp as hell!

  • 5L1D3R

    To me, the article simply comes down to “how to lighten your load”… I am by no means a professional, and only bought my first serious DSLR this spring, (my first real camera was a Minolta T101 my dad found snagged on a bush in the mountains, 35 years ago) however, I’ve always been technically minded and quickly dove into the guts of digital photography. In my opinion “prime vs. zoom” is a non-issue, and is like saying the mountains are better than the beach. As lenses go, I have a 50mm prime, an 18-55 kit lens, and a 70-300mm zoom. Basically, I got the three lenses that best fit in my budget, yet still give me the most shooting options. I have had to use “two-step shuffle” zoom in some cases, and in others, I had to play with shutter speed or ISO to compensate for a large aperture. What it comes down to for me, is the situation. When I’m going for artistic: close-ups, bokeh, DOF, flowers and kittens, I use the prime. …when I’m taking pics of my kids recitals and can’t walk all over the auditorium, standing in front of other parents, I find the one prime spot (no pun intended), whip out the tripod and zoom, and giggle (quietly) at all the parents with toy cameras, jockeying for front row.

  • Timesshadow

    My perspective on this is that people tend to “skim” what they read unintentionally and don’t realize it. This then leads to a misunderstanding of what was read but still elicits a reaction. Slightly analogous to the point of this article! Which was to affect the way people think and visualize. It has absolutely nothing to do with which is better, only that our author who is also an experienced instructor, has discovered through experience that if one follows the suggestion of using a prime only and daily, it will become much easier to train the brain to see things in terms of photography. That’s all. I have done this myself and agree.

  • Thank you for this perspective Time. I’m happy you saw the article this way. I couldn’t have summed up what I was trying to say more perfectly than this.

  • denise870

    my step dad recently got a fantastic white Mercedes-Benz E-Class E63 AMG only from working part-time off a pc. you can find out more…….>> -> NICEST WORK!!!! <-

  • bigdeli hajar

    Lenses? I do not have money to buy them all so it necessary do a compromise and choose something.
    ????? ??????? ??????????? ?? ????????? ????????????????? ???

  • dargahi

    The focal length of the lens in place on what basis?
    Otomatik kap?otomatik kepenk

  • Amanda

    I agree. The best decision I ever made was limiting myself to only my 35 1.8 for a month! Learned a lot! But now looking at another zoom (24-75) to add to my lens collection. 🙂

  • Prashant Suhano

    Definately.. Primes are better….
    I used to shoot with zooms earlier, but recently I got a 50mm… And that’s fantastic.. compared to zooms, it it sharper, rich colors….
    Thanks for this fantastic article….

  • Great linkbait article, by the amount of comments it clearly has served his purpose.

  • smat

    Its amazing the shots I was able to capture once I learned how to use my 50 MM prime…..thanks for the article.

  • JohnChapin

    I’ve found that with a long zoom lens, I tend to zoom in too close. Then it’s difficult to crop with good composition. I’d be better off with a shorter prime.

  • DieMusik

    Agreed totally.

  • Many moons ago, I stopped using zoom lenses. These days I carry two full frame camera bodies with their primes: Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 and Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L II. One strap for two bodies (Blackrapid Yeti) helped distribute the weight while walking, even with my osteoarthritis.

  • Vikash

    I switched to prime lenses a year back and i could say thats it is one of the best decisions i ever made for my wedding photography career. The benefits of prime is not just confined to the optics quality but it changes the very way i take the photographs,it force you to think and anticipate every time you take photographs.


  • The selection of lenses can be difficult, especially for those who are starting. Laziness taught us modern television and popular cinema has taught viewers to accept zooms and mismatched focal lengths as standard, while others seem to focus on making everything look “normal” all the time.

    Complicating things is the fact that a lens that could be WIDE (Wide) in a chamber, could not be in another. This has to do with issues crop factor and Phil Rhodes has discussed this issue in depth. If you wonder what would be the performance of a particular lens on a camera, we recommend taking a look at this comparison fields of vision developed by the people of Abel Cine.

    One of the hardest things to learn in any job is to balance the right combination of practical and aesthetic. Is the difference between “oh! I made the decision! “and” Oh! I made the decision and says what I want it to mean! ”

    Using prime lenses – and choose the best – it gives you a better chance of being in the latter case http://www.arasuweddingphotography.com

  • jdizzl

    It depends on what you shoot. I got to a point where I just never pulled out the zooms anymore from a quality and SIZE standpoint so I got rid of them and got higher quality glass in the focal lengths I like. Other camera technology helped too. When I pull out my dslr I have very specific things in mind and want the ultimate in quality. I carry a 24 for architecture and landscape. A 50 for general shooting and street and a 105 for portrait. The 50 1.4 gets 60% of shots and mayne 20% each for the others. On the other hand I wouldn’t shoot an event or wedding without a zoom. And when I went on a safari I borrowed a friends zoom.

  • jdizzl

    No you wouldn’t spend a lot of time switching…they are very purposeful lenses. You just need to think creatively. Others often shoot with 2 bodies.

  • Mahmud Ahsan

    XF16mm f/1.4 and XF56mm f/1.2 are my 2 most favorite fujifilm lens and I always use these. In case I carry only one lens, then it is XF16mm f/1.4 attached with my X-T2, which I use for landscape, evening shoot, and when I need environmental portrait, I do some cropping in post process.

  • tom rose

    I am not going to weigh in on one side or the other of this argument. Of course neither zooms nor primes are “better” in any absolute sense. Each type of lens is “better” than the other in some ways and worse in others. It all depends on what features are important to the individual photographer. I used to like using zooms. But now I prefer prime lenses. Let me explain why.

    I know all the arguments for and against prime lenses and for and against zooms. I know that zooms deliver more than “good enough” IQ for most purposes, and that the variable focal length is sometimes essential for some shots and some conditions, and is always a convenience. I know that you cannot “zoom with your feet” because changing position changes perspective. One of the zoom’s biggest advantages over any prime is the control it gives over precise framing. I also know that the best modern zoom lenses can deliver sharper, more detailed images than many prime lenses. So I start from a position of no bias and no misunderstanding.

    When I started using Canon DSLRs a few years ago I built up a collection of ‘L’ zooms and was very happy with them. Looking at the images I got, there was little to criticise … at least not technically, so long as I had been working carefully and not sloppily.

    Then I tried Canon’s 135 f/2 L. The much brighter viewfinder image and the speed and precision of the AF made it a joy to use, as did the ability to render backgrounds completely blurred to make a subject stand out. But, more importantly, the final results were stunning. I am not talking about being an equipment-obsessed nerd, pixel-peeping at 100% on a monitor (although that definitively shows the near-total freedom from aberrations, the extraordinary level of detail, and the corner to corner sharpness).

    When printed large (e.g. A2) the difference between images from the 135mm Prime and those from the zoom is not only visible to the critical eye of an experienced photographer. It easily seen by anyone.

    But it is more than that. Whether they are viewed on screen or printed, the images I make with the 135 prime look “better” at any size than anything I ever got from the highly regarded 70-200 f/4 L IS. That includes postcard sized prints where there is no difference in acuity or in the amount of detail that has been resolved.

    The “better” look is not a result of zooming in, or getting the microscope out, and checking, at the pixel level, why the photo looks so good. It is an instant, intuitive, response, before the logical brain has had time to get involved. It would seem that differences in the image have an effect on our perception below the level of conscious awareness of what those differences are.

  • tom rose

    I agree about the nonsense about “zooming with your feet” and that the very best prime lenses challenge any zoom lens in cost, but it is not an obsolete myth that primes are “better” than zooms, at least in some respects.

    People forget that”better” is a relative term and not some absolute. Which type of lens is better depends on what the photographer is trying to achieve and the constraints they are working under.

    Zoom lenses have become excellent and are a wise choice for a working professional where getting the shot often matters more than getting the best possible image quality. But it is still a fact that, although the best modern zoom lenses are optical marvels, the best primes out-resolve them, show less difference in sharpness between centre, edges and corners, show fewer aberrations and, with their wide apertures, can achieve effects that are difficult with slower zooms.

  • Both Prime and Zoom lenses have its Upsides and Downsides. We normally use Prime lenses for portrait and indoor shoots and use zoom lenses on events and weddings. Sometimes we wouldnt get facility to reach near to the subject hence we will have to stick to the zoom lenses to capture right pictures. However this article is worth reading 🙂


Join Our Email Newsletter

Thanks for subscribing!

DPS offers a free weekly newsletter with: 
1. new photography tutorials and tips
2. latest photography assignments
3. photo competitions and prizes

Enter your email below to subscribe.
Get DAILY free tips, news and reviews via our RSS feed