How to Get Great Photos with an Old Camera


In this article, I will give some tips for you on how to get great photos from your old camera or an outdated model you’re still using.

The rapidly advancing technology issue

Camera technology has advanced so rapidly in recent years. Which makes it easy to think that the brand-new DSLR you got last year and love using so much is already outdated and incapable of taking good pictures. Comparing apples to apples, or in this case cameras to cameras, is enough to give one a healthy dose of humility when you discover that the six-frame-per-second camera you were so excited to buy has now been outclassed by its newer seven fps counterpart.

How to Get Great Photos with an Old Camera

This and all the images in this article were taken with either a Nikon D200 or Canon Rebel XTi. Both were made in 2006 or, as I like to call it, the stone age of digital photography.

Looking at charts and diagrams of how high ISO performance in the latest models run circles around your old dusty camera can give anyone a healthy dose of GAS, or Gear Acquisition Syndrome. I’m just as guilty of this as anyone else. I have long since relegated my outdated gear to the upper storage shelves in my closet in favor of newer, fancier, more expensive cameras that hold a much closer place in my heart.

However, there’s no rule that says you can’t take beautiful pictures with old cameras and just because something new and shiny comes along doesn’t mean your old gear is suddenly destined for the dustbin.

Dig out the old camera

As a way of experiencing this firsthand, I recently got out my old Nikon D200 camera, the first DSLR I ever owned, and put it through its paces to see if I could still get some good pictures from its aging body. Of course, anyone who has shot with older gear already knows the answer is, absolutely!

A good camera from 2007 is still a good camera in 2017. The beautiful pictures you took in days gone by aren’t suddenly going to transform into ugly monstrosities just because another model of camera has come down the pike. However, what I was really interested in investigating was whether outdated cameras are still worth using in spite of the many advances in modern imaging technology.

My trusty old Nikon D200

For example, here are the specs of the old Nikon model with which I shot several photos for this article:

How to Get Great Photos with an Old Camera

Old cameras might not have all the bells and whistles of their modern brethren, but don’t discount them entirely.

  • 10 megapixels
  • A maximum ISO of 1600
  • Heavy as a brick
  • It has no Live View
  • There is no touch screen
  • There is video capability
  • 11 Autofocus points
  • One very slow Compact Flash card slot

Any serious photographer would scoff at these specs, right? Well, not exactly. Old cameras like this may not hold a candle to modern models with every latest innovation packed into a much smaller space. But if you’re willing to put up with a few tradeoffs you may be surprised at what you can still do with them.

The real question isn’t whether or not an old camera can still take good pictures because if it could take good photos in 2006 it can still do so today. Nothing about a newer camera inherently makes the older camera any worse, unless by way of comparison. There are a couple of things you can do to get better photos if you do have, or are thinking about buying, an older camera that can help you get the most out of your images.

Work within the camera’s limitations

One of the best things you can do if you want to get good pictures with old gear is to know the strengths and limitations of the equipment you are using. Then take pictures that work around those characteristics.

How to Get Great Photos with an Old Camera

ISO limits

For example, one trait that is almost universal among older gear is miserable high ISO performance. Modern cameras can often shoot at ISO 3200 or 6400 without breaking a sweat. But be prepared to adjust your expectations quite a bit if you pick up a model from 10 years ago.

Solving the problem isn’t all that difficult, it just takes a bit of creativity and adjustment on your part. When I took my D200 (which I don’t dare shoot past ISO 800, and even that is pushing it) out to experiment as I wrote this article, I kept the ISO performance in mind. I aimed for pictures where light was not a scarce commodity (in other words, avoid low light situations). The result was pictures I like quite a bit and would hold up against anything I could take with my modern Nikon D750.

Megapixel limits

Old cameras are also generally low on the megapixel front. That doesn’t mean a whole lot unless you’re doing a great deal of heavy cropping to your images and even then you can still get good results if you crop carefully. It is something to keep in mind though, and it’s important to shoot your pictures knowing the limitations like this. Get closer to your subjects instead of cropping, or find a lens that has a little more reach to it compared to the lenses you are used to using.

How to Get Great Photos with an Old Camera

Other limits of older cameras

In addition to more megapixels, modern cameras often have large image buffers, burst rates, and more reliable autofocus systems than their older counterparts. Keep this in mind if you go to a sporting event or head out to capture wildlife photography with an older camera, and change things up a bit to get the images you are looking for.

Plan your shots carefully so you don’t fill up the image buffer, or shoot with a smaller aperture to give yourself more leeway in terms of depth of field. If you’re used to relying on a modern autofocus system to lock on and track your subjects, then try experimenting with center-point autofocus and learning to be a little more nimble when composing. Also, try learning new techniques like back button focus to improve your skills so you don’t have to rely on the camera doing all the heavy lifting for you.

Limitations can be a good thing

Ironically, sometimes the limitations of older cameras can actually help you get better pictures because you have to improve your photography skills in order to compensate for the camera’s shortcomings.

How to Get Great Photos with an Old Camera

For example, using the ultra-fast burst mode on a modern camera can actually impede your ability to get good shots. Using an older camera without that feature can force you to plan your shots, think about things like composition, and how you want your subject framed within the elements of the picture, and ultimately get better pictures as a result.

My point is that if you find yourself using an old camera, whether a basic DSLR or one that used to be the cream of the crop in its heyday, you should know what you’re getting in to beforehand. Plan around its limitations so you’re not frustrated or confused when you are trying to take pictures.

How to Get Great Photos with an Old Camera

In-camera focus stacking, flip-out LCD screens, and hundreds of autofocus points are nice and can certainly help you get better shots. But often the key to getting better shots is to simply study the fundamentals and hone your basic skills.

Work on understanding exposure, lighting, and composition. Know how to control the camera you have in order to get the shots you want regardless of whether the camera is brand new or well past its prime.

Know your camera’s capabilities

One thing that consistently surprises me when shooting with older cameras is just how much they can actually do. While they might not have touchscreens and built-in GPS, it’s not uncommon to find highly advanced tools such as a plethora of metering modes, Auto-ISO controls, customizable bracketing options, and a variety of autofocus options.

How to Get Great Photos with an Old Camera

A top-of-the-line camera from 2005 may not compete with the cream of the crop today, but when it was released it had to appeal to demanding professionals and advanced amateurs which required a certain set of features and capabilities. Even basic models like the early Canon Digital Rebels, which were aimed at consumers and hobbyists, had all sorts of features that may surprise you if you’re used to modern models.

If you shoot with older gear, either an old camera you’ve had for a while or something you picked up online or in a thrift store, take some time to get to know it. Go to the manufacturer’s website, download the manual, and really get to know what it can do. Dig through the menus and experiment with the various options. Find a willing helper and test out its various modes and features. You may just be surprised at how capable and useful these older cameras can really be.

How to Get Great Photos with an Old Camera


I often get asked for camera recommendations and I like to suggest that people take a serious look at used cameras and lenses. Check reputable online websites that sell these sorts of things for significantly less than shiny new cameras you will find on store shelves. Just because a camera has been put out pasture doesn’t mean it’s not worth using. In fact, the money saved by buying older gear could be put to good use in other ways.  An investment in better lenses, a tripod, or even educational materials that can advance your skills in much more significant ways than simply buying a new camera.

What about you? Do you shoot with an older camera or are you considering buying one? What tips and tricks do you have for getting the most out of these types of cameras? Please leave your thoughts and questions in the comments section below.

Read more from our Tips & Tutorials category

Simon Ringsmuth is an educational technology specialist at Oklahoma State University and enjoys sharing his enthusiasm for photography on his website and podcast at Weekly Fifty. He and his brother host a monthly podcast called Camera Dads where they discuss photography and fatherhood, and Simon also posts regularly to Instagram where you can follow him as sringsmuth.

  • KC

    If your images are going on the web, more so social media or a web store, an older camera is fine. Where older cameras can be a test of patience is some are slow to autofocus. Some also don’t render JPEG’s as well as newer cameras. That’s noticeable when you “pixel peep”, but not an issue when you don’t.

    I don’t change cameras all that often. Yes, there’s some new tech out there. A “full frame” camera sounds great, but so does medium format. Someday.

  • Peter Cleife

    But none of the cameras mentioned are old! This is my old camera a 1mp Kodak. s

  • Hahaha! You’re right Peter, that’s an old camera! I actually used one of those (it was a re-branded version put out by Apple called the QuickTake) and for its time it was actually pretty good 🙂

  • Exactly, KC. No matter what you have there’s always something better, so it’s best to make the most out of things instead of always looking to something else 🙂

  • CopyKatnj

    I’m still using my Nikon D50 and D90 cameras. I’ve purchased some good lenses and good software that keeps me happy with my results. I’ve even gone back to older images and re-processed them after learning much more about post processing and composition. Since I’m posting online mainly for my self and friends on Flickr, and not printing, I find I’m satisfied. I’ve looked at newer models but just can’t justify the upgrade.

  • Larry Kurfis

    I use my Nikon D60 which purchased Jan 2009. I’m just really learning to use is and have been able to take some damn good pictures. I know I can’t push the ISO, have slow burst mode, 3 focus points, watch what I crop, and can’t print posters. But I know it’s controls and buttons better than most of my friends that have D7100 and newer. I did upgrade the glass to a 18-200.

    Thanks for a great article.

  • That’s really too old. LOL 🙂

  • Luke

    I just upgraded from a Rebel T3 to an original 5D. I paid $250 for the body and a 50mm f/1.8, and couldn’t be happier. It is somewhat limited as far as ISO performance, but it still beats the rebel as long as you expose properly. The biggest limitation in my mind is the autofocus performance, but as long as you aren’t working with high speed movement it isn’t that big of a deal, and I have even taken some photos of aircraft landing with no problem. Yes I would love to upgrade to a newer camera, but my old 5D still gets the job done, at a price that is pretty hard to beat.

  • glennsphotos

    I shoot with a Canon 7D 2 and use the 7D as a back up. I was taking photos at my Daughter Sweet 16 and set up my older Canon 30D on a tripod for a photobooth and got some wonderful group photos that the children took themselves with a remote. So glad i used this as we had a whole different set of photos that i wouldnt have had. My other daughter sometime uses this; along with my film Canon A1 from yesteryear, with wonderful results.

  • AnneCanyon

    Nikon D80 here — similar vintage to the D200. It feels like an extension of my hand. I keep finding new things it can do.

  • You know, one of these days I just might pick up an old D200 to replace the one I have which currently has a problem with the shutter. I really like using that camera and can see why you would enjoy your D80 so much.

  • $150 for a 5D and 50mm 1.8 lens? That’s a fantastic deal! Even though the camera is old, it’s still capable of taking some amazing shots especially with that lens.

  • Sameer Kalbag

    Great article and a good re-read whenever we get affected by GAS. Shooting with a Canon T3i and a refurbished Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 and couldnt be happier.

  • I’ve heard great things about that Sigma 17-50 lens. I’m glad you’re enjoying using it!

  • Tikaro

    You’re almost in the throwaway bin with the D200. A mere $200 buys a used D300 w ISO 3200 and live view etc. $400 gets a used 7D with ISO 6400. It’s a great time to be a bargain hunting photographer.

  • My goodness, you’re right! I just checked the price of a used D300 and it’s super cheap. This is a great time to be looking for used gear 🙂

  • Paul Plak

    D200 isn’t that old, and it was Pro range. D70 is some other challenge …

  • Andhaka

    Shooting with a 5D classic (not old, classic) and a couple of primes… learning more that way than with a modern super-duper hyper fast body.

    Sure, there are limitations, but as the article nicely put, limitations can be good to improve your skills that, in the end, are what powers the tool you have in hand.


  • Diane Yusko-Fielding

    I am a hobby photographer with a D200 taking a photography course for professionals and find I am learning so much more about my D200 that I would have otherwise. Yes it has limits but I am not a tetchy person so find even some of the features on it a bit of a challenge. I am able to take very good photos both handheld and using a tripod and a am delighted with the camera and the results.

  • One of the cool things about the D200 is that it really was a pro-level camera when it came out, so even though it can’t compete head-to-head with some models today it does have a lot of advanced features that can really be put to great use. In some areas like buttons and control dials it actually outshines brand new modern cameras!

  • Todd Barrick

    It took some time for me to adapt to digital. I had used Olympus 35mm OM film cameras, Graflex medium and large format cameras for decades until about 5 years ago when film and processing became impractical. I started with an Olympus E-500 and upgraded to E-520 10 Meg gear a couple years back. I especially enjoy the in camera image stabilization and live view aspects of the 520’s. I sank quite a lot of money into some auto digital lenses which are great, but I wondered if my ‘oldie but goodie’ manual lenses would work since I have so many of them in primes and very long telephoto. With the use of an inexpensive ($100) OM to DSLR adapter from Olympus, I found that they work just fine except for the manual focusing aspect. It’s a bit tougher to do this being there is no in camera focus indicator in the DSLR’s. Live viewing, shoot, review and erase works wonders and this doesn’t cost a dime for wasted film or processing. Yes, they are much heavier, but then, I was accustomed to their weight from 40 years of use, so no big deal to me. A whole lot cheaper then spending thousands more dollars for digital lenses that I already have in range finder manual. I still use film shooting techniques with DSLR manual instead of auto settings anyway. Old school techniques and gear can still give professional results! I thought about upgrading again to the hard to find and very expensive E-5 which has a couple more Megs and 4K video, but will I use it? I doubt that. I looked at Olympus mirrorless models, but here we go again, more money for expensive bodies and micro lenses and more adapters. I decided that what I have…suits me just fine! This will all work for most other camera brands also so don’t throw the old gear into the trash can just yet. Try an adapter for your models first.

  • Diane Yusko-Fielding

    Thanks Simon. Good to know. Diane

  • Eduino de Mattos

    Obrigado (Tank You) NB; Possuo uma NIKON D7000, Tenho Realizado Excelentes Fotos com ela, MAS; ás Pessoas “leigas” Pensam que PODEM SUBSTITUIR A LUZ POR ISO,…? não Pode, Pois Esta Prática IRÁ CONTRIBUIR PARA FOTOS COM EXCESSO DE RUÍDO (Noise), ABERRAÇÕES, …Importante; ARQUIVO RAW, a Máquina “antiga” deve possuir esta POSSIBILIDADE, do contrário o Registro Não Terá Recursos Para OTIMIZAÇÃO,…Abraço.

  • Susan Pulfer

    my uncle gave me his Brownie Hawkeye camera when I was quite young and apparently you can still get film

  • Earl Whitt

    When I upgraded to a D810, I kept my old D90 and used it when I was in “camera risky” situations, forcing me to working within its confines. I think that remaining proficient with the D90 helps me to keep from using some of the capabilities of the D810 as crutches. No matter which camera I use, I’m still working to use the lowest ISO practical. I also work the scene to capture perfect in-camera framing. Rather than pushing the capabilities of the camera, I’ve found it is more useful and better for me professionally to push my own capabilities as a photographer. Keeping in touch with my older camera has helped me in that regard.

  • Von Will
  • Christopher Fernand Budiarto

    I still use camera from 8 years ago, my parent bought it for me when I’m in junior high school. My camera is Canon 550D, Honestly I still satisfied with the result and not planning to upgrade my camera, new release camera is great but it just getting more expensive and expensive especially for college student like me. But with the limitations of my camera, I learn to take better image. Yeah new release camera is good, its make life more easier but I’m glad, I can improve much because the limitations itself. For who thinking, Your camera isn’t capable for today standard, maybe true but that limitations doesn’t become obstacle to learn and improve your picture. Good luck

    Ps: sorry for my bad english, english isn’t my native language

  • Dan Burke

    Exactly Todd, I have the E500 and am still using it for holiday travel. I picked up an E5 fairly cheap on E-Bay only as I figured it would be the last DLSR from Olympus so there wouldn’t be any further upgrades than that. Go Micro/Mirror less/FullFrame and start on the GAS merry go round again, I don’t think so. Photography’s a great hobby and my ancient gear is doing just fine. Cheers!! PS My ten year old car gets me to locations just as quick as the all bells and whistles new models too, lol!!

Join Our Email Newsletter

Thanks for subscribing!

DPS offers a free weekly newsletter with: 
1. new photography tutorials and tips
2. latest photography assignments
3. photo competitions and prizes

Enter your email below to subscribe.
Get DAILY free tips, news and reviews via our RSS feed