Reasons to Shoot High ISO Images

Reasons to Shoot High ISO Images

1/125th at F2, ISO 6400 (Fuji X100s)

Fuji X100s: 1/125th at F2, ISO 6400.

The most common photographic fear that I come across these days is when people are afraid to raise the ISO setting on their cameras.

Just a handful of years ago, these fears were justified.  Raising your ISO to 1600 or 3200 was a no-go for a majority of cameras.

But no longer. Things are changing.

Some Reasons Why to Shoot High ISO  

The improvements in camera technology have been such that you can now photograph at ISO 1600, 3200, and even 6400 with many of the newer SLRs, micro four-thirds, and mirrorless cameras.

Before you move on, if you are unclear about what ISO is, read more on the subject here:

But doesn’t a lower ISO mean better image quality?

Canon 5D Mark II: 1/320th at F6.3, ISO 1600 (135mm). The high ISO allowed for a 1/320th shutter speed to account for both the motion in the scene and for the long focal length used.

Canon 5D Mark II: 1/320th at F6.3, ISO 1600 (135mm). The high ISO allowed for a 1/320th shutter speed to account for both the motion in the scene and for the long focal length used.

Well yes – and no.

Yes, if you are setting up a studio shot and controlling the lighting.  Yes, if you are using a tripod, if you are a landscape photographer, or if there is very strong natural light.  Yes, if you don’t have to compromise your shutter or aperture settings to expose the shot correctly.  ISO 200 will always create a significantly sharper and cleaner image than a shot at ISO 1600 when the aperture and shutter settings are the same.

In every other case the answer is no.

Raising your ISO will give you the ability to capture a higher quality photograph in many situations because it gives you the ability to use a faster shutter speed and smaller aperture (a larger aperture number) to get a sharper scene.  Getting the aperture and shutter settings correct are much more important than using a low ISO in creating a technically great photograph.

If you want to know how great event photographers consistently create such bright and beautiful images, it’s not only because they use fast lenses and flashes.  It’s because they are not afraid to raise the ISO to very high levels to capture the natural light in a scene.

In addition, the look of grain at high ISOs in digital cameras has become more pleasing.  The newer camera models have not only reduced the strength of grain (noise) at high ISOs, but they have given that grain a more pleasing look.

ISO has now become a luxury instead of an obstacle.  We can photograph in dark areas while handholding the camera when we need to.

Detail Shot of the 5D Mark II at ISO 1600. Minimal, pleasing grain.

Detail Shot of the 5D Mark II (released in 2008) at ISO 1600. Minimal, pleasing grain.

When shooting at a high ISO, get the exposure right

The major problem with photographing at a high ISO is that raising the exposure in post production significantly will ruin the look of the grain.  Raising the exposure a small amount is usually okay, but if you are photographing with a high ISO, you need to be even more diligent than usual about exposing your images correctly in the camera.

Pay attention to colour noise versus black and white noise

You also want to pay attention to how your camera handles the look of noise in your colour images.  The Fuji X100S, for instance, handles colour noise exceptionally well, where as other cameras do not do so well with colour noise at very high ISO levels.  However, in many cases, the problem can often be solved by simply turning the photo into black and white.

Fuji X100S, tiny detail at 6400.  Excellent color noise.

Fuji X100S, detail shot at ISO 6400. Very significant grain but excellent colour noise.

Take a look at the image detail above.  This was taken with a compact mirrorless camera at the very extreme end of its ISO range, 6400.  Yes, there is a lot of grain but it still looks good.   I prefer not to go over 3200 with this camera when I can avoid it, but without using ISO 6400 here I probably would not have been able to capture this image.

How do I test my camera’s ISO?

I wish I could talk about specific cameras here, but the list is too long.  I use the Canon 5D Mark II (released in 2008) and Fuji X100S and regularly shoot at ISO 1600, 3200, and even 6400 when capturing the city streets at night.  The Canon 5D Mark III does an even better job with noise at high ISO.

Each camera has different noise (grain) levels, so the first step is to research reviews on the noise levels of your camera or potential purchase.

If you own the camera already, the next step is to test it out yourself.  Make sure you are using a fast shutter speed and an aperture of somewhere between F8 and F16, so that each image you take is guaranteed to be sharp.  Then take the same shot at ISO 200 all the way through 6400.  Look at the images zoomed in to 100% (1:1 in Lightroom) on your monitor in both black and white and colour.

If you have a photo printer, I highly suggest printing out those images to see how the grain looks in real life and to see the differences between each image.

It is also important to remember, if you are regularly printing at smaller sizes, such as 5×7 or 8×10, then you will likely not notice a significant difference between ISO 200 and 1600.  If you prefer to print at larger sizes, such as 13×19 or 20×30, then there will be a noticeable difference.  So test it out.

Canon 5D Mark II: 1/500th at F9, ISO 800 (28mm).

Canon 5D Mark II: 1/500th at F9, ISO 800 (28mm).

Zoomed in - insignificant grain at ISO 800.

Zoomed in – insignificant grain at ISO 800

Fuji X100S: 1/250th at F9, ISO 1600.

Fuji X100S: 1/250th at F9, ISO 1600.

Insignificant and pleasing grain.

Zoomed in – insignificant and pleasing grain

Grain is beautiful!

Do you remember the last old, grainy photograph that you saw in person?  It was gorgeous, right?  Digital technology is getting there.  Now is the time to get over your fear and try out shooting at higher ISO!

Read more from our Tips & Tutorials category

James Maher is a professional photographer based in New York, whose primary passion is documenting the personalities and stories of the city. If you are planning a trip to NYC, he is offering his new guide free to DPS readers, titled The New York Photographer's Travel Guide. James also runs New York Photography Tours and Street Photography Workshops and is the author of the e-book, The Essentials of Street Photography.

  • Juan

    I enjoyed this post a lot and found it very useful. I’ve never been afraid of shooting at high ISOs but instead usually forget to close the diaphragm of the lens to a suitable aperture. So thanks for posting.

  • Johan Bauwens

    Don’t pixelpeep ! Even on A4 (21×27 cm) noise is hardly visible, let alone at 500 k internetpage pics.

  • Johan Bauwens

    6D rules, I have taken concert pics at Iso 12.800 and they are ok. A few years ago, this wouldn’t have been possible.

  • Thanks! One less fear now to photograph in low light. This whole grain-fear has been dissolved! 🙂

  • Ez

    High ISO pictures from digital cameras give you NOISE, not grain.

  • Gregg Hasenjaeger

    When I worked with film equipment and shot bands I would push the film 2x to 4x its normal rating to get the natural color of the stage lighting. Yellow lights weren’t so bad but the blue and red lights didn’t give much light to work with. It is easier now because you can switch ISO any time. Back then you picked an ISO and that was it for the whole roll of film. In my opinion, grain can add character to an image or set a mood. The bands thought it added a grungy look which most liked.

  • Matt

    Part of my issue with grain is poor compression. Either it will result in huge file sizes or compression artifacts.

  • Richard Taylor

    Whilst I like to shoot at the lowest native ISO possible I have no problems shooting at very high ISO (3200+) to capture an image if need be.

  • kevin

    A great message! I shoot pictures on dark rides at Disney World and Disneyland where freezing motion is impossible and a tripod unlikely. Still, some incredible photos are taken using ISO 6400 or higher This isn’t your daddy’s film.

  • Marijke van Endhoven

    ISO 5600

  • Andy Whiteman

    Very good article. Agree completely. What’s wrong with grain? When I used to shoot film grain was common and I don’t recall everyone throwing their hands up in horror….you cold use it to create atmosphere. I shoot at up to 6400 with a D7000 and the results are quite acceptable. With D300 up to 3200.

  • Debbie Langer Borato

    What mid grade camera works well with high ISO?

  • Raja

    Gotten ambitious and clicked a lot of high iso pix. How do I clean them up in photoshop?

  • hamid

    in both images we can see noise on there faces which is not pleasing to me. as I m also having fear of using high iso 🙁

  • Fernando Trindade

    Definetly a go on high ISO.
    I am mostly a macro and underwater macro photographer, so I was always avoiding high ISO.

    Recently I tried some shots with some low budget 500mm f/8 mirror and 600-1300 f:8-16 lenses with 2x teleconverters and I HAD TO to try high ISOs to compensate for the small aperture.

    I ended up with some great shots, with much more contrast because of the lower shutter speeds.

    Try it.

  • Pavol Sojak

    Another great article
    I do not fear to use high ISO because of the noise, but because of the ‘color correctness’. If you understand what I mean.
    Many times the colors at high iso have very unpleasing washout colors.
    Would be interested to hear your experience on this aspect of high ISO. Anyone, pls?

  • Dianne Bennett

    I agree. While we always aim for the best quality possible in our photos, in low light it is best to raise our ISO and capture the memory, than to let the moment pass us by as if it never were. I have a photo of my dad that was taken at a campfire on the beach. In terms of quality, it is noisy and not a great photo, but every time I look at the photo it prompts me to recall the wonderful memories of our evening at the beach campfire. Without using a higher ISO for the photo, this memory may not be so readily recalled.

  • Shane McDonald

    Same here Andy with a D7100. VERY acceptable. Can’t complain.

  • jdizzl

    That grain might be fine for personal memories, but they are unpublishable for magazines, pdf glossy brochures, and even web. So for me, it is about technicality. Of course the photo always comes first… but it can’t look like crap either. ISO 1600 on crop and 3200 on FF are reaching the limits of acceptable noise. Maybe 6400 on the better FFs. Maybe 12,800 on a Nikon D5 on a once in a lifetime shot at a concert… That 6400 shot on the x100s would be a definite “no.”

  • kushaal Gowda

    Great stuff! I completely agree with it.
    But anyone can make money by clicking photos and submitting it online.
    Visit –

  • Mait Oliver Hellat

    I just have a Finepix S3300 the images only look fine with iso 400

  • Martin Cohn

    For stage photography, boosting the ISO can be tamed a bit. But a telephoto lens, no tripod, and variable lighting limit what you can control to get a shot. Buying the F2.8 instead of the F4 70-200 helped a bit. Converting to monochrome covers a lot of sins (including the magenta/blue lighting that musicians like), as did adding a downhome stabilizer (Tripod quick release plate with a cord tied to it, step on the other end of the cord and pull to tighten).

Join Our Email Newsletter

Thanks for subscribing!

DPS offers a free weekly newsletter with: 
1. new photography tutorials and tips
2. latest photography assignments
3. photo competitions and prizes

Enter your email below to subscribe.
Get DAILY free tips, news and reviews via our RSS feed