8 Tips for Long Exposure Photography

8 Tips for Long Exposure Photography


Long exposure photography has become very popular in the last couple of years, getting a lot of coverage in landscape photography magazines and on photo sharing websites.

Long Exposure Photography Sunset

Pitstone Windmill at sunset (ISO100, f/18, 118 s)

With the ever-increasing number of options for 10-stop neutral density (ND) filters on the market, there has never been a better time to give it a go.

However, taking photographs when using such high-density filters gives rise to a set of problems that you may not have previously considered, so this article is intended to give a few useful tips that I have picked up since starting my journey learning about long exposure photography.

First, a bit of Background…

A neutral density filter should be just that: neutral; blocking out light without leaving a colour cast on the resulting image. Each ‘stop’ of an ND filter reduces the amount of light entering the camera by a factor of 2, i.e.:

  • 1 stop = 21 = 2 = ND2
  • 2 stops = 22 = 2 x 2 = 4 = ND4
  • 3 stops = 23 = 2 x 2 x 2 = 8 = ND8
  • 4 stops = 24 = 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 = 16 = ND16
  • 10 stops = 210 = 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 = 1024 = ND1024

A fairly common 2-stop filter (often referred to as ‘ND4’) reduces the amount of light hitting the sensor by a factor of 4. A 3-stop (‘ND8’) filter by a factor of 8 and so on, until you get to 10-stops, when the light is being reduced by a factor of 1024, meaning that the shutter needs to be open for over 1000x longer than without the filter.

Whilst this is the reason that you get silky smooth water or clouds rushing across the sky, it is also the reason why your workflow will need to be adapted to overcome issues as a result of the huge reduction in light.

Long Exposure Photography - Lakes

Derwent Water, Lake District, UK (ISO100, f/16, 67 s)

On to the Long Exposure Photography Tips…

Tip 1: Whilst a tripod is considered a baseline requirement for many landscape photographers, it is even more important when shooting with a 10-stop filter. Exposures can easily extend to greater than a couple of minutes, so it is vital that your tripod is as sturdy as can be. This typically means ensuring that the legs are stood on firm ground, the centre column is not extended and the strap is secured so not to catch the wind.

You will often read that people recommend hanging your camera bag from the tripod to add ballast weight, however I think that it can often act as a large sail and cause greater instability if windy, so I instead tend to place a beanbag (full of uncooked rice) on top of the camera to add extra weight, without significant additional surface area.

Tip 2: Given that the filter is incredibly dense, unless the conditions are really bright, there will not be enough light getting through to allow the autofocus to function. Therefore, it is best to compose and focus your shot without the filter, switch to manual focus and then carefully attach the filter. This way the lens will not hunt for focus when you press the shutter.

Tip 3: It is important to close the viewfinder shutter, or at least cover the viewfinder, to ensure accurate light metering (if shooting in an automatic exposure mode, such as aperture priority) and to prevent stray light from sneaking in during the exposure. I’m not sure how critical the second point is but given how much the auto-metering is affected by the open viewfinder, I no longer take the chance so ensure it is closed before taking my shot.

Tip 4: For exposures in excess of 60 seconds, you’ll need to be able to locate the ‘BULB’ mode of your camera. Switching to BULB enables you to open the shutter for as long as you choose, enabling really long exposures, meaning:

  • You will most likely need a remote shutter release cable so that you can lock the shutter open for a given period of time (it’s a good idea to attach the remote release to the tripod using Velcro during the exposure, again to stop it from catching the wind and swinging around).
  • You will most likely need a way of calculating how long to leave the shutter open for. In some cases, the maths is trivial (for example, if an exposure without the filter is ¼ s, when using a 10-stop filter it becomes 0.25 s x ~1000 = 250 s, 250 s / 60 = ~4 minutes) but in others it can be more difficult, and as the light conditions can change pretty quickly, a phone app (such as NDCalc for android/iOS) can come in very handy.

Tip 5: Choose the right conditions. Ideal conditions for long exposure photography are when there is dappled cloud and a strong wind (see Tip 1). If there are no clouds, or no wind, there will be nothing to add movement. I prefer to shoot around sunrise/sunset, as then the sun is low in the sky, increasing the contrast in the clouds, resulting in an exaggerated streaking effect in the final image.

Long Exposure Sunrise

Sunrise over the limestone pavement (ISO160, f/13, 50 s)

Tip 6: Even at low ISO, super long exposures can introduce noise in the form of hot pixels. You may not be able to see these when viewing the results on the LCD screen of your camera, but when viewed at 100 % on your computer monitor, you may find a number of bright red/green/blue pixels in your image.

An effective way to remove them is to take an exposure of identical length, at the same ISO, with the lens cap on. The hot pixels will be identical in all shots, almost like a finger print of your sensor, so by replicating the exposure with the lens cap on, you will generate an entirely black image, with the same hot pixels, to subtract away from your chosen image during post-processing.

Tip 7: Some brands of filter are known to leave more of a colour cast on the final image. This is a great reason (one of many) to shoot in RAW, as the colour casts can often be corrected during post-processing. Sometimes, for particularly long exposures, it may just irreversibly compromise an image and, in those instances, a black and white conversion is often the best way to overcome it.

Tip 8: A long exposure does not make up for poor composition. In fact, the you will probably be even more frustrated at the resulting photograph given the additional effort required to take and process it.

To Conclude…

Whilst I have discussed quite a few additional points to consider when taking long exposures with high-density ND filters, you soon learn to adapt them into your own work pattern that becomes routine. I find that taking long exposures often requires more planning, thought and processing than with my other photography, however the results can be breathtaking and are often worth it.
If you have any additional tips or issues that I haven’t mentioned here, I’d love to hear them in the comments.

Also check out these 15 Fantastic Examples of Long Exposure Photography.

Read more from our category

Elliot Hook is a wildlife and landscape photographer based in Hertfordshire, UK. Elliot loves being outdoors with his camera, and is always looking to improve his own photography and share what he has learnt with others. Elliot also can be found at his website, on Twitter, Flickr and 500px.

  • Darlene Hildebrandt

    Great thanks for reading!

  • kahi

    tip#6 is equivalent to “Long Exposure noise reduction”, which can be switched on in most modern DSLRs. Then the camera does it all automatically and you don’t need to take 2 shots and subtract manually. The actual name of the feature might be slightly different among the camera brands.

  • RoxanneAnderson23

    Yes indeed. This kind of photography is tiring but the results is worthwhile. The use of filters can greatly help in coming up with excellent images. Thanks for sharing such tips. It helped me a lot. I also learned about landscape photography at http://www.cherishartz.com/

  • Noel Smith

    I’ve found an effective way for people on a budget to do long exposure photography. Getting many ND filters can get expensive. What I use is two polarizing filters. If you take apart (there is a metal ring that unscrews from the frame of the filter that holds the glass in) one of the filters and flip the glass then put it back together, you can stack the filters and have a cheap but very useful variable ND filter. This is very useful, as you can compose and focus the shot, then turn the filter to darken it. The down side is that you may need to take a few shots before you get the correct length of exposure and you will want to shoot in raw as you will likely find you need to correct for color a little.

  • Pat Keith

    Grew up in Standon, Hertfordshire, UK and know how beautiful it is. Would love to see pics of what it looks like now.

  • freddy

    Lost a bit of credibility swapping the camera bag for a bag of rice! Are you serious?
    Camera bags only flap in the wind if they nothing inside them. Even with camera and largest tele on the tripod there’s still over 5 kilos of stuff left in my bag and it doesnt flap in the wind. The bag of rice? wow! On top of the camera? How big is this bag of rice?

  • Khaz

    Neglecting to add relevant commentary to a thread whilst correcting a person’s grammer is the equivalent of trolling.

    Careful consideration to this process is imperative since your exposure quantity is greatly reduced under the same period of time using shorter shutter type photography.

  • otomatik kapilar

    It is a good witting article.Becouse is photographic article, it should content more photos.
    ??? ?????????? ???? ???????
    upvc ?????
    ??? ?? ????

  • Photography by James

    Great article Elliott. Re Tip 2: an alternative is to switch your camera to back button focus. Then you won’t need to keep switching from autofocus to manual between exposures.

  • English Narc

    No comma is necessary after “whilst” in the initial post, and the correct spelling is “grammar”.

  • English Narc

    Overly windy conditions could potentially ruin the shot (depending on your exposure time) despite your best efforts to securely anchor the camera in place. I use a bungee cord tautly fastened to the tripod hook and a weighted camera bag placed firmly on the ground.

  • otomatik kapilar

    Until now I did not notice
    these things. I’m glad you’ve mentioned. I
    understand what you mean.
    minnet bozdemirgaleri Selçukgaleri selgukminnet bozdemir

  • otomatik kapilar

    Until now I did not notice
    these things. I’m glad you’ve mentioned. I
    understand what you mean. I must thank you for this article
    minnet bozdemirgaleri Selçukgaleri selgukminnet bozdemir

  • Chinmay salvi

    I’m having a lot of troubles with the exposure burns while shooting with long exposures. Please help me out here.

  • yho

    and i thinks you are an english teacher !! shut up please

  • Kay Pehnke

    Thx, helpful.

  • Nevajo

    Great article! I use an app for long exposure photography. Most android apps are outdated, but i finally found a good one. https://play.google.com/store/search?q=ndwatch

  • Sierra The Windmill Goddess

    OH MY GAWD, windmills are SO IN right now! Like, who doesn’t want a windmill!?!?!?

  • Brooke The Amazing

    OMG! I know right?!?!? I got mine on sale on Black Friday 🙂

  • Sierra The Windmill Goddess

    OMG. ME TOO! Like, I had to trip a hoe(literally) to get the last one at Target. Where’d you get yours gurrrrrl?

  • Justin Adam

    Just referring to Point 6, “An effective way to remove them is to take an exposure of identical length, at the same ISO, with the lens cap on.” I assume this means that one would need to manual focus the original shot?

  • Brooke The Amazing

    OMG!! I actually did trip over a hoe! I got it at Home Depot!

  • Sierra The Windmill Goddes

    NOICE. Haven’t been there since I decided to stock up for the Zombie Apocalypse.

  • Thanks for great article! I recommended it on todays post on my blog: http://rikkeisabelle.wordpress.com/2015/01/12/water-and-long-exposure/?preview_id=118

  • MSG

    Whether you are manually focused or not should not affect this. Noise caused by hot pixels is caused by the sensor, not by any optical properties. The purpose of taking a second photo with the lens cap off, is to produce a photo in which no actual light is reaching the sensor. As hot pixels are not related to optics, the noise will still show up, allowing it to be easily isolated and dealt with.

  • MSG

    Lens cap on* rather

  • George Johnson

    Long exposure photography is often discussed in terms of natural landscapes, milky seas, waterfalls, clouds. It’s possible to get creative with long exposures in urban environments to by reusing the classic “traffic streak” but in a more creative way.

  • Justin Adam

    Thanks 🙂

  • Jebby

    Isn’t a bean bag with uncooked rice inside…a rice bag?

  • Raghav

    I don’t see a mention of turning off IS on long exposure photography. This is a suggestion made on a lot of similar blogs.

  • mohanpudussery


  • Joshua James

    Good tip. On my Nikon D5300 it’s “Long exposure NR” in the settings.

  • Eric Douglas

    Having finished reading your excellent article, I went to look on your images on 500px.com. Liked a few of them, too.

  • chamelionboy

    Thank you Elliot. I obtained my first ND filter set earlier week and had been following some tutorials, and after playing with some settings had switched off the built in Noise Reduction on my camera without realising it. Afterwards I found all these maddening little bright colour pixels throughout my photos which I was unable to filter out with Lightroom. After many Google searches I gave up on trying to find the reason as to why it was occurring as no one was talking about the issue.

    I was going through DPS this morning, came across this article, and BANG!!!! You are the first person in any of the Long Exposure articles I read to talk about the Hot Pixel issue and your solution, which made me realise it was turning off my camera’s Noise Reduction setting that caused it to start happening in the first place.

    As soon as I get home today, this setting is going back on immediately.

    I am heading to Bali in 4 days and I am going to be trying my first Long Exposure’s in the field. I had resigned myself to putting up with these imperfections…but now…


  • Jules

    I’ve been spending all day attempting to take a long exposure photograph, but when I set my camera to Bulb mode to keep the shutters open, then flip the switch to see the photograph being taken on the screen (as multiple tutorials have directed) it automatically sets back to 1/50 in the lower left corner. When I change it back to Bulb mode while the Information screen isn’t up, it just changes the light of the subject, and I end up taking a picture of nothing but a white screen. What am I doing wrong? Please help!

  • Steve Falletti

    No, that’s an old woman riding a Kawasaki

  • Steve Falletti

    When this happened to me, I simply began collecting beanie babies

  • Avi

    Hi, this may sound stupid but I am just curious; Is there a way to take a long exposure shot if you are the one moving and your subject is standing still? For example if you are in a car taking a picture of the city as you drive by. I don’t know much about Digital Photography and I asked google but still have not had my question answered. Thanks for any info you can give me

  • I suppose you would need to put your camera on rails to avoid all kind of shaking. You would want a very smooth movement, and a car would not provide that, it would rock you and the camera around. Rails or putting the camera on a tripod with wheels might work. For small movements a slider would do the trick. In any case you would not only need a way to move the camera along a continuous track but also at a constant speed, to get good results. Again, for small movements there are motorized sliders that can move the camera perfectly. Possible yes, but quite and undertaking (and probably expensive).

    On the other hand, you could just try it in a car and see if you can get the results you want.

  • Praveen Sajwan

    This is a very informative article . i am a beginner photographer . These tips will help me long exposure.Please send me some more info about f stop and ND filter . thank you

  • WinterWolf

    How do you know how many stops to use?

  • mike walling

    I was going to write a comment about how much I love the word “whilst” and I read the comment below. I still appreciate your vocabulary and imagination.

  • I think you need to find something important to worry about whilst you’re criticizing others.

  • Paul Ashton

    Dont forget to turn I.S off as sometimes the stabilizer can hunt whilst on the tripod causing a blurred image

  • Suhail Khan

    How about keeping the long exposure noise reduction on

  • rwhunt99

    I especially like the 6th tip, good idea! I would also suggest to try live mode to lock the mirror up to avoid the shake when the mirror pops up (if your camera has a mirror lock setting, then do that).

  • rwhunt99

    I hadn’t thought about that, I might try a comparison and see it they bring the same results.

  • Akay

    Gr8 article.
    I have ND filters of many fixed values , plus variable ones.
    How do U rate use of variable filters against fixed ones which may need changing to adjust “movement” to be blurred ?
    Do I understand correctly that first one should take a picture WITHOUT any filter to get exposure parameters ?
    Then evaluate the “motion” to be blurred ?
    BUT how to do this all important evaluation?
    Rest is simple math ! No ?

  • Akay

    OMG sooooo may omg’s
    ha ha ha

  • Akay

    ha ha ha

Some Older Comments

  • Sheena June 4, 2013 08:01 am

    There is a Cherry-Almond Smoothie in the book will be Gaga s dangerous zone dieting habits.
    It will slow down. Ok, so moving on to NR3: the importance of exercise and physical fitness.

  • Ken June 2, 2013 02:51 pm

    All your tips make absolute sense but number 6 was a really big plus for me. I'm using my old Oly E500. the sensor takes wonderful landscape shots but I can't push past ISO 320 or I have noise.

    When I tried some light painting I got some good results but then I noticed...yes you get it. Those red, green and blue pixels.

    I dismissed them as noise and gave up on night shots thinking it was a sensor problem. well, yes it was but now I know how to cure it.

    Thanks Ken

  • Photography by James March 24, 2013 08:53 pm

    It sounds like you didn't have a strong enough graduated filter on your sky to tone down the highlights. The difference in EV (exposure value) between the sky and the foreground will always be the same number of stops so I would advise the following:
    1. With no filters in place measure the foreground exposure only by angling your camera to exclude sky from the viewfinder. Make a note of the shutter speed.
    2. Set your camera to use spot metering and, keeping the same ISO and aperture settings, pick a point in the sky that you want to be properly exposed and note the shutter speed given by your camera.. This need not be the brightest point, that is up to you.
    3. From the difference in indicated shutter speed you can then calculate how many stops your ND Grad needs to be to tone down your sky. For example, if the first shutter speed is 1/30 second and the second is 1/125, then the difference is 2 full stops. If the first is 1/8 it is 4 stops and so on. I suggest using shutter speed as the basis of measurement as there is a wider range of stop settings with that option than keeping shutter speed constant and changing the aperture.

    The problem then becomes whether you have (or can even get) a strong enough ND grad for the exposure range. If not then your options are:
    1. Shoot multiple exposures and use HDR software or blending techniques in Photoshop to combine the images.
    2. Shoot in RAW and use Lightroom to manipulate the image.

    For myself I have barely looked at Photoshop since I started shooting RAW and "developing" my images in Lightroom. It is definitely the way to go in my opinion.

  • Zafer Kocabey March 11, 2013 10:48 am

    To Geerd-Olaf Freyer | YaYapas:

    If you use Lee filters, it is not so much difficult to detach the filter form the lens. The holder is attached to the adaptor via a clip and what you should do is just pulling out that clip. Make a new composition and attach the holder with filter on again.

    To Elliot Hook:

    Thank you for this great outline. I think using ND filters gives best results if used with ND Grad filters to overcome overexposures or very dark areas.

  • Michael March 7, 2013 10:15 am

    Great tips. I haven't gone to the expense of ND filters yet, only using the naturally low light of dusk/dawn or as is often the case around here in the Pacific NW where I live, heavy clouds. This combined with ISO 50 and fairly small apertures plus my CPL often gives very long exposure times. Starscapes I will use the self-timer. Your tip # 5, by the way, seems quite subjective. For one thing, the clouds can be moving quite fast even when there is no wind at ground level. I've never thought much about wind when taking long exposures. For one thing a major benefit in my opinion is not the streaking but the increased saturation of color.

  • Michael Girard January 5, 2013 02:16 pm

    Very good article, I've tried a few shots but am still looking for the right combination of settings to be really happy with an image.
    One thing I would change with your tips is in #2, I would compose/focus, add the filter and then switch to manual focus, by adding the filter with the autofocus on it is locked in place whereas if you switch to manual and then add the filter I find that I can't help moving the focus off.

  • Shane McDonald January 2, 2013 04:54 pm

    Wonderful post. I recently did a shoot with 2 x ND8 filters. The result was very good but the sky highlights were very bright in contrast to the foreground even though I metered for the foreground and had an ND grad filter on the sky. Any advice on metering on this? I was using ISO 100 at f/22 but perhaps a higher ISO and f stop around f/16 might have been a better choice.

  • Tony Prower December 7, 2012 01:43 am

    Amazing work, love the classic jetty shot at Derwent water. A wonderful collection showing the magic of long exposure photography.

  • Liliana November 27, 2012 12:12 pm

    Great information. Thanks.
    I understand that turning off the mirror lockup is also helpful?

  • stevesdatingblog.com October 9, 2012 07:33 am

    You really make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find this topic to be actually something which I think I would never understand.
    It seems too complicated and extremely broad for me. I'm looking forward for your next post, I will try to get the hang of it!

  • Andy Keeble September 30, 2012 07:21 am

    Excellent advice, particularly about covering the view finder.
    Thank you.


  • Arthur Raynolds September 29, 2012 04:28 pm

    Thank you for providing this site. I find your site easier to read and more informative the some of the American Photo web sites. I live in the mountains of Western North Carolina.

    I'm not sure if it has been mentioned by other photographers, but I find shooting fireworks is best when the shutter is set on 6 second exposures and the brightness is controlled by the f-stop. Typically I shoot at f-11, but wil stop down durning the grand finale. I prefer an ASA/ISO of 100, but that may be bumped up depending on a number of factors like cloud dispersal & distance from the firing point. Tripod is of course a necessity as is a clear vantage point without glaring lights distracting from your image nor unseen powerlines in every shot. My camera of choice is the Nikon D200.

    While I would like to share some photos, I have not learned how to set up a URL. I have not done flicker.

    Thank you,

  • Chris September 29, 2012 05:14 am

    Tom - super cool shot. I love it!

  • Pikey September 28, 2012 08:27 pm

    Excellent Tips

    Don't forget if you have liveview facility on your camera you will be able to see the image on the screen when using a 10 stop ND filter although the viewfinder will be completely opaque. Useful for image composition to save keep removing the filter from the lens when recomposing shots.

  • nick September 28, 2012 11:30 am

    Nice topic and well detailed.
    for sun position i use this website to see the position of the sun (sunset/sun rise by hour).
    once you try it, you will make part of your gadgets. soon will come up with more options. some very dedicated guys collects feedback from users.


  • Nate September 28, 2012 09:12 am

    The only potential problem I see is using the uncooked rice. It is susceptible to moisture and if the sock/bag/container gets wet so does the rice and it becomes mush. Use plastic beads instead (experiment with the various sizes for your specific application). They function the same and shed moisture!

  • James Gonneau September 28, 2012 05:45 am

    An excellent article, and the comments have been just as good. I'll have to definitely try the trick with the lens cap on, sounds almost too good to be true.

    A "Big Stopper" is on my wish list, but with just two Hoya ND4s (and a circular polorizer, which darkens as well), I'm pretty happy with the results:

  • gonzalo September 27, 2012 08:03 pm

    Thanks very much ajm ¡¡

  • AJM September 27, 2012 07:46 pm

    Gonzalo; do a search for "dark frame subtraction photoshop".

    You'll find some paid applications and lots instructions for doing this in Photoshop, but I believe most any image editor should have the features necessary to do this. (just need to be able to create a "difference" layer)

    Here is one page I found that describes it pretty well.

  • David Walker September 27, 2012 07:19 pm

    Great article Elliot, very informative.

  • Ranjith September 27, 2012 11:33 am

    Here is another long exposure shot


  • Bloice Davison September 27, 2012 10:27 am

    Also, I forgot to mention the mirror lock up feature. Would have helped me that day too.

  • Geerd-Olaf Freyer | YaYapas September 27, 2012 08:26 am

    Great article and beautiful pictures.

    The only thing that bothers me at my ND filter, is the lengthy procedure (after making the first capture) of removing the filter, selecting a new image composition, focussing, reattaching the filter, making the long exposure, internal noise reduction in the camera, ... and over again. What do you think of variable dense filters or the Big Stopper system? I think it would be easier with such filters to refocus between the long exposures.

    Feel free to visit my tries




  • John Davenport September 27, 2012 02:55 am

    Used an ND8 to capture this shot off the rocky RI coast at sunset http://www.phogropathy.com/sunset-on-point-judith/ one of my favorites so far with my ND filter. It really does wonders!

  • marius2die4 September 27, 2012 01:18 am

    Greats article and I love the pictures.
    Some of my pics:

  • gonzalo September 27, 2012 12:56 am

    about tip 6, "An effective way to remove them is to take an exposure of identical length, at the same ISO, with the lens cap on. The hot pixels will be identical in all shots, almost like a finger print of your sensor, so by replicating the exposure with the lens cap on, you will generate an entirely black image, with the same hot pixels, to subtract away from your chosen image during post-processing." How you do that?
    Thanks in advance, Gonzalo.

  • Collette September 26, 2012 11:05 pm

    Great tips on using ND filters. I had borrowed some from a friend once, but didn't do the research beforehand and quickly became frustrated. For some reason, it never occurred to me to do the focusing BEFORE putting on the filter, causing my camera to hunt all over the place. The rest of the less "obvious" tips were great too, especially on what weather conditions produce great images. Thanks for your insight, Elliot!

  • raghavendra September 26, 2012 10:45 pm

    love this tips, comes in handy


  • Duncan Fawkes September 26, 2012 06:28 pm

    Good tips Elliot, nice work! I recently posted my own Guide to Long Exposure photography which fortunately includes includes some of these tips! http://www.duncanfawkes.com/a-guide-to-long-exposure/

    I particularly like #8. I find that often long exposure is used to enhance an otherwise dull photo. In that way it becomes a visual "trick" in a similar way to some HDR rather than complimenting and enhancing an already good photo. So ye, focus on getting the composition right in the first place. It can be a good idea to frame the shot without the filters on as they can make the viewfinder/LV very dark to work with, and you don't want your "test shots" taking minutes to expose!

  • Elliot September 26, 2012 06:18 pm

    Thanks for the feedback, and cheers for sharing your shots!

  • JongMauriceMJde September 26, 2012 04:36 pm

    I took a couple of long exposure shots without the use of ND filters.. I am curious what the filters could do for these shots.
    of course, tip number 5 isn't appliable on these..

  • Ranjith September 26, 2012 03:41 pm

    A very important and informative article on long exposure and use of ND filters. Now i am curious to lay my hands on one those.

    Here is my share of a long exposure.

  • alex long September 26, 2012 10:06 am

    Hi elliot,
    Deep gratitude to u for sharing long exposure photography always learning new things. Conditions, light, evironment and circumstances differ. Will apply what i learn here. Thanks once again for sharing.

  • Beetwo77 September 26, 2012 09:53 am

    Meant to post my gallery! Sorry for the shameless self promotion but some people might find the images interesting:


  • Beetwo77 September 26, 2012 09:52 am

    Great article. Thanks for covering the topic well. It really is a great way to photograph and requires plenty of thought. I have also been experimenting with more than 10 stops with great effect. I find with my Sony Nex, and its small filter size, its even cheaper to get into. I have recently put together a gallery of 10 or more stop images:

  • Scottc September 26, 2012 08:58 am

    Some great tips in this article, especially the description on how to focus and the breakdown on the ND filters. Long exposures are one of my favorites, these tips will help.


  • Tom September 26, 2012 06:30 am

    Love long exposure work- here's a shot taken on Saturday taken in Donegal Ireland

  • Brian Fuller September 26, 2012 06:11 am

    Great article. Can't wait to try this myself. I have yet to use the bulb function and very rarely have hit 30 sec. I have a 2 stop circular polarizer and that is it at the moment. I need to get my hands on an ND16 for these Texas sunsets.


  • Alistair Scott September 26, 2012 01:48 am

    Great advice! Three other things i'd add:

    1) If you don't have a remote release, an alternative for long exposures is to use the self-timer. Set it to about 10 seconds so that any vibrations that you may have caused by pressing the shutter button will have died away before the shutter fires.

    2) If your camera has 'mirror lock up' that's an additional way of miminising vibrations. But, as with using a heavy ND filter, you will need to compose your scene before doing anything else.

    3) An alternative type of ND filters are 'grads' ... half ND filter and half clear ... for holding back exposure on a particuléarly bright part of the scene, the sky shortly after sunset, for example.

    Thanks for a great article!

  • Scott Wyden Kivowitz September 26, 2012 01:26 am

    Neutral density filters are so much fun to play with. I definitely recommend for people, who can afford it, to pick up a Lee Filter system instead of a screw on filter. Having the ability to pick your own ND density is priceless.

Join Our Email Newsletter

Thanks for subscribing!

DPS offers a free weekly newsletter with: 
1. new photography tutorials and tips
2. latest photography assignments
3. photo competitions and prizes

Enter your email below to subscribe.
Get DAILY free tips, news and reviews via our RSS feed