Wildlife Photography – Consider Your Subject First
The following Wildlife Photography article was submitted by wildlife photographer and author Joe McDonald from hoothollow.com. Learn more about Joe and his work at the end of this post.
Most everyone wants to learn new techniques or secrets, methods or tricks that can help one to improve their wildlife photography. I’m all for the sharing of information, but I think its important to address an equally important aspect of photographing wildlife, and that is the need to do so benignly and without harming the subjects you are shooting.
Bison: Although a bison may resemble a cow, and acts similiarly when merely grazing, this huge resident of several western US parks is potentially very dangerous. Each year several people are seriously injured when they move up too closely to a bison grazing or lying about.Here in the United States wildlife photography is not, for the most part, regulated in any way. In contrast to Britain, here in the States if one is lucky enough to find a bird’s nest there are few restrictions upon ‘working’ that nest, especially if the nest is on private land. Our national parks impose restrictions on photographing at nests or den sites, which is fortunate considering the number of visitors that pass through these parks each year, but on private land, if you have access, anything goes.
I say this not to whet anyone’s appetite to rush across the pond to photograph in America but instead to highlight the need for American photographers, as indeed for all photographers, to consider the welfare of their subjects first. While we may all be interested in making great pictures, the most important consideration of any wildlife photographer should be the subject’s well being. How can that be done?
In American National Parks where large and potentially dangerous mammals roam, not stressing or pushing an animal may be as beneficial to the photographer as to the animal. I’ve met a number of photographers who have moved too close to bison, moose, elk, and even white-tailed deer and been charged, although in each case the photographer escaped unscathed. Unfortunately, every couple of years some photographer gets mauled or killed by a grizzly bear, often because the photographer approached too closely and triggered the attack.
Grizzlies are dangerous, and indeed are the one animal that I’m genuinely afraid of and that I worry about when traveling afield out west. I know several people who have been charged, and one who has been mauled, and in every case the attacks came without warning and by complete surprise. Give a bear plenty of room, and just hope that you see a bear before it sees you.
I mention this because in most cases, when there is a bear attack, it is the bear that suffers. If the bear can be found it’s often destroyed, and, in cases where there is a fatality, more than one bear may be killed to guarantee the culprit is caught. Large herbivores are less likely to be destroyed after a dangerous interaction since attacks are often rut-induced, when a moose or elk is approached too closely and instead of fleeing decides, instead, to show everyone whose boss..
While I may be guilty of rambling on from birds to mammals as I introduce my premise, I’m doing so to underscore the need to self-police ourselves, regardless of whether or not there are particular rules or restrictions in place. That being said, here’s some points to consider when working with wildlife, behaviors or philosophies my wife and I adhere to as we photograph wildlife around the world.
Move slow and stay low. That’s a mantra we follow as we approach or work around wildlife, moving slowly in an almost tai-chai fashion so that no sudden movement frightens the subject. In most cases it’s almost impossible to actually sneak up on an animal but, by moving slowly and unthreateningly, one can often move in close enough for a good photograph without causing alarm.
Great Crested Flycatcher with a captured tiger swallowtail butterfly: Although the bird was nesting in a birdhouse in my backyard, I avoided shooting there and instead placed my blind near a convenient hunting perch the bird used. The flycatcher would often land on this perch with its prey before flying into the nest box.It’s equally important that when you’re finished shooting you move out with the same degree of deliberation required for moving in. Here in the States there are some bird photographers I know who will move in for tighter and tighter images until the subject flies off. That’s wrong, and as you approach any bird or mammal, if it displays nervousness or signs of stress you should back off. .By doing so, many animals actually become habituated to photographers and eventually show little interest in someone close by.
I’ve never been a big fan of nest photography, especially of song birds and other species that may nest in thick cover. If cover must be moved or removed to provide an opening for your lens or your flashes the nest simply should not be shot. Cavity- or box-nesting birds often do so in more open locations and photography doesn’t pose the same threat, but either way, your presence may stress the bird or influence its behavior or nesting success, and frankly its not worth it.
I advocate a far more benign approach, where I photograph birds at favorite perches or near feeding or watering stations I’ve erected. Finding a favorite perch often involves time spent in observing, which should be as much fun and as rewarding as actually shooting the subject.
This often involves the use of hides or blinds, and sitting inside a blind for any length of time, especially if nothing is happening, requires a degree of patience. But this is good, as it forces you to slow down and to actually observe. In our US National Parks blinds are not permitted, but they’re generally not needed either for the species one can photograph, but on private land a good blind is invaluable for working birds and mammals.
For many, however, sitting in a blind for long periods of time is easier said than done. If you’re like me, if nothing is happening I’ll start fretting about the things I could be doing back in the office, catching up on editing that never seems to end, or answering emails, or returning calls. I’d like to say that I ignore all that and stoically peak out of my peep hole waiting for my subject to appear, but I don’t. Instead, as blasphemous as this may sound, I often read!
Granted, by reading in a blind I sometimes miss a shot because I don’t notice the appearance of my subject. Most of the time, however, my subjects reveal themselves, by their movement through the brush or by a call. When my subject approaches, I drop whatever I’m reading and get ready. I’m not an idiot here, as I sometimes can’t take the chance since some subjects offer no warning as to when they may appear, and for those I simply forego the book!
Reading, however, liberates me, since it seems I have so little time to do so that the time spent in the blind doing so, whether photographically productive or not, is time well-spent. I look at this pragmatically, honestly soul-searching the often conflicting demands of the office with my desire to photograph, and I reason that if I’m productively utilizing my time I’m more inclined to stay in the blind, waiting, where otherwise I might succumb to office pressures and leave prematurely.
My use and placement of a blind or hide subscribes to my initial tenet of doing no harm, as I position a blind in a location I’ve judged safe for the subjects I’m shooting. To do so may require prior observation, and generally requires common sense as well. Unless you are extraordinarily lucky, the act of sitting inside a hide will not guarantee great shots, or any shots for that matter. To be successful, a blind needs to be located where an animal is likely to be, at a food or water source, at a look out, or a favorite resting spot. Knowing where to place the blind is half the trick, but there really is no trick involved, just simple odd-fashioned observation.
About the Author – Joe McDonald has written 7 books on wildlife and digital nature photography (see some of them below). He is a multiple winner of the prestigious BBC contest and he and his wife Mary run workshops and photo tours in wildlife photography (specializing in East Africa) – you can contact them via email at info@hoothollow.com or visit them online at hoothollow.com
Wildlife Photography Books by Joe McDonald
- Photographing on Safari: A Field Guide to Wildlife Photography in East Africa
- The New Complete Guide to Wildlife Photography: How to Get Close and Capture Animals on Film
- African Wildlife (Portrait of the Animal World)
- A Practical Guide to Photographing American Wildlife
- The Wildlife Photographer’s Field Manual




23 Responses to “Wildlife Photography – Consider Your Subject First” - Add Yours
April 2nd, 2008 at 12:33 am
I cannot agree more with Joe wonderful article.
It follows the mantra of almost any wilderness excursions of leaving “No Impact†and only take memories. Sometimes with the aid of a camera.
The No Impact should also apply to the stress on our fellow creatures, which are already, with changes to climate and increasing incursions of tourists are feeling more stress just to survive.
Niels Henriksen
April 2nd, 2008 at 1:22 am
Wonderful article, Joe!
I have not photographed animals much, but my husband and I did go to a wildlife preserve in Nebraska last fall and I got a few shots. You can see them here – http://www.amatterofmemories.com/2007/11/wildlife-safari.html.
My favorite one by far is the one of the pelican! Love that picture!
April 2nd, 2008 at 1:34 am
It would seem that the desire to photogragh wildlife would indicate a respect and admiration for it, and therefore this sort of thing would not need to be stated. Sadly, that probably isn’t always the case.
April 2nd, 2008 at 3:08 am
There was very little in the way of concrete photographic advice here, and was instead mostly philosophical reflection.
I have no complaints about this whatsoever, by the way. =)
The world would be a better place if more of us took this approach to life.
April 2nd, 2008 at 3:25 am
Great article Joe and a very important message you’re giving out to budding wildlife photographers. I’m surprised at the lax rules imposed on nest photography on private land in the States, though I believe you have a lot of “if it’s on my land I’ll do what I want” type laws.
April 2nd, 2008 at 4:32 am
Hi!
English is not my native language so I wonder what kind of thing a blind is (found no proper translation). Is it actually something to buy and carry around or is it rather a kind of a seat above the level?
Thank you for the article!!
Konst
April 2nd, 2008 at 5:12 am
Great article about respecting nature (and avoiding mauling in the process!)
April 2nd, 2008 at 1:11 pm
Konstantin,
A blind or hide is short for a “hunting blind.” Usually a camouflaged area with a hole or slot for the camera and observation, but not much else.
It “hides” the photographer’s movements from the wildlife (though some can still smell you).
Not much different than a hunting blind only the results are different.
April 2nd, 2008 at 11:44 pm
I can remember being at the Rocky Mountian national park and signs posted about the Big horn sheep telling people not to get out of their cars. There were people and even children out wandering around, despite warnings of injury and even death if you happen to have and encounter with one of these animals.
April 3rd, 2008 at 1:22 pm
Interesting article, and a good reminder to give wildlife some space, although people who spend much time around wildlife generally already have this common sense.
Joe seemed to imply that wildlife is better off in National Parks, where they are protected, yet Joe didn’t mention the millions of people who go through Natl Parks each year to gape at the critters, and run right up to them to take thier picture. He didn’t mention how many wildlife are hit on Park roads by vehicles, or how often wildlife is chased out of their habitat to avoid the masses of people. He didn’t mention how in Natl Parks animals like bears can become habituated to people, which can often cost the animal his life.
Joe also seemed to imply that wildlife on private land is in danger because there are no laws to protect them. We do have laws in America that set hunting seasons for many wildlife species, as well as laws regulating chasing, hazing or abuse of wildlife.
Next time you are out driving around the country, look for wildlife. Where do you see the deer, elk, or moose? Generally, they will be in the river bottoms, irrigated pastures and fields, and even in yards – on private land. Wildlife are there because most landowners take care of their property by controlling weeds, developing streams and other water sources, and growing grass and other crops that wildlife feed on much of the year. When private property has limited or no public acces, wildlife live unmolested, and thrive, much or all of the time.
I know this first hand because we own a ranch, and over 30 deer live right here in the hay field and pasture by our house. Often in the fall, 14 or more buck deer will walk right past my yard to and from the river. We have had several moose here, and one young female spent several days literally in our yard one winter to avoid predators. We also have elk, antelope, numerous species of birds, fish and other animals right here within a few hundred feet of our house.
We go to lengths not to molest the wildlife on our ranch and in the area. We feed many species of birds, but store bird feeders, dog and livestock feed, and BBQ grill out of reach of bears. We also have a bear proof-dumpster. When we are out on horseback or on foot, we are always aware of our surroundings and make enough noise to give bears warning we are in the area, and we properly store our food while in cow camp. We don’t want to be the reason a bear would have to be put down. We do not allow our dog to chase wildlife. We practice rotational grazing with our livestock, to allow grass plants to grow and thrive between grazing, similar to your lawn between mowings. As the livestock are grazing, and while the grass plants are resting between grazings, the wildlife have free choice grazing. The deer often rest under or trees during the afternoon heat, and drink from our ponds and irrigation ditches. During the winter, wildlife feed on the hay we spent thousands of dollars to harvest and store. We are not the exception. Most of the ranchers in this state, and other states, operate the same way. Some have even created wetland areas to attract more wildlife. Of course, there are ranchers and other private landowners who do not operate this way, but in general, they are the exception.
Joe wrote a fine article. I just don’t want readers to be mislead into believing the popular yet false theory that when wildlife are in a Natl Park they’re safe, and when wildlife are on private land they’re in jeopardy. Nothing could be further from the truth. If you don’t believe me, start watching where the wildlife graze, sleep, and and raise their young. When you have healthy wildlife to photograph, thank a private landowner.
April 4th, 2008 at 3:15 am
This article really inspired me to do what has been nagging at me lately….to slow down and get out and shoot my favorite shots of all…nature! Thank you so much. Your photos are amazing. The bird with the butterfly! Wow!
April 4th, 2008 at 11:37 am
These are great! I just love that little bird with the butterfly in his mouth!
April 4th, 2008 at 10:00 pm
Great article..I would really like to go to a National Park…I like the picture of the Bison..
April 5th, 2008 at 9:04 pm
Interesting article, I live in Botswana. I enjoyed visiting and camping wild life reserves (game reserves) in Botswana. In Botswana it’s not allowed to go off road and climbing out of the vehicle to get close to wild life.
Wild life in most game reserves are in abundance. Elephants, lions, cheetahs, leopards, giraffes, zebras, buffaloes, hyena, hippos and many more roam freely in these reserves.
If you are lucky you might see them very close to the road or on the road where you might be able to get a very close photo. But in most cases they will be far and you will tempt to use your largest zoom. Since you are in the vehicle the chance of camera shake is high specially if you have a crowd in your vehicle, in my case my three kids will always move to the side where you get a better view and the vehicle bounces more than while traveling.
Since my canon EOS 400D is not equipped with a Image Stabilizer lens I use a pillow or a bean bag on the shutter sill if I can manage to capture in that position or change camera settings to high shutter speed and ISO setting up to about 400 in good light condition and set other settings to accommodate the situation.
In low light condition is bit difficult as you cannot use the flash to photograph wild life. But try to accommodate the situation by changing appature and ISO trying to keep the shutter speed to a minimum of 100 or 125 and stabilize the camera if the object is far.( and shouting at children to keep the vehicle stable.)
It’s very important not to disturb the wild life trying to get close to them since you will loose any chance of capturing the object or others seeing the animal,and also it will make the animals to get use to human movement which destroys the natural behavior of wild life.
Ajith Kurukulasooriya
April 12th, 2008 at 11:35 am
I love the idea of giving help and tips. This article did just that! I’m very into wildlife photography even though I’m not a professional photographer. The article gave very helpful tips like leaving space for you subjects, move slowly away, and many other wonderful tips so that you don’t get eaten or even injured. Also I enjoyed the detailed and clear photos. I say clear because some pictures are a little blurry. Anyways I just wanted to say that this article was full of great things!
April 12th, 2008 at 6:02 pm
Great article, great photo.
P.S. We have bison in the wild in north-eastern Poland, they are smaller than American one.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wisent
April 15th, 2008 at 6:50 am
I think that as nature lovers and photographers we also need to be aware of our feet as we get to the destination to shoot whatever wildlife. consider what damage you might be doing to the flora as well as the fauna. Also, while watching where you step you may see some great things to photograph there as well.
October 12th, 2009 at 11:18 am
What is the best setting for shooting birds that are overhead with the sun above?
May 13th, 2010 at 4:20 pm
Regards for posting this piece of content. I’m decidedly frustrated with struggling to homework out pertinent and intelligent commentary on this issue. Everyone today goes to the very far extremes to possibly drive property their viewpoint that both: everyone else in the planet is wrong, or two that everyone but them does not really understand the situation. Many thank you for your concise, pertinent insight.
September 23rd, 2010 at 1:00 am
ok soo i would love to be a photographer
but the only problem i have is how do wild life photographers make money, do like people buy there art? do they sell it on the streers? do newspapers pay to use it in a article? these are the questions i owuld love a responce/ answer to
July 21st, 2011 at 1:45 am
YangHack do Metin2 oraz Boty do Metin2, zobacz na stronie http://www.MetinBoss.pl
December 13th, 2011 at 3:36 am
Here in South Africa we have many wonderful oportunities to photograph wild animals. I think there is a lot of competition. Animal photos are needed for calendars, postcards, magazines, books, adverts for game reserves and lodges. And if you happen to catch an amazing thing happening between wild animals I suppose many outlets will be interested to buy the rights to your photo.
But I don’t think that photographers get rich.
Keep your day job and do photography for the pleasure of it.
December 13th, 2011 at 3:40 am
Ajith, what is in your bean bag/pillow? I need to make one, but I need to know if it contains styrofoam pellets or plastic pellets, or both.
I only joined this site yesterday and already I’m trying to photograph birds in my garden.
Wonderfully informative articles!
Leave a Reply