What Is The Next Digital Innovation You Would Like To See?

Copyright bfishadow
There’s no doubt digital photography has made some amazing leaps and bounds since hitting the mainstream consumer mark well over a decade ago. Some things have been a bit ‘gadgety’ (I’m thinking of a Kodak camera that had a ‘Thinner’ feature to slim down waistlines) however there have been some handy features for consumers and pros alike.
Some were driven by the advent of digital photography itself, such as sensor cleaning technology that had no reason to exist in the film world. The ability to set white balance would be another innovation and something that was never possible in the film world, short of rewinding film part way through a roll and changing canisters. The same goes for ISO adjustment. A lot of the others can be classified as ‘gadgety’ as well, but they do provide some real world uses, such as the newer face detection technology that helps the camera focus and adjust exposure to properly render people, rather than bright backgrounds. Sure, a number of these things aren’t needed if basic photography principles are learned, but the utility is hard to deny.
As we are starting a new decade I’m left thinking forward to what another 10 years will bring. While the soul of photography will always lie in the camera handler’s ability to capture what they have in front of themselves in a meaningful way, regardless of tools available, I’m curious to know what innovations you’d like to see come to digital photography in the next 10 years.
Please leave a comment below with your guess of where digital cameras (P&S and DSLR or ????) will head in the semi-near future. Or feel free to list your wishes for new innovations. And remember, “Nothing” is a perfectly acceptable answer too.




119 Responses to “What Is The Next Digital Innovation You Would Like To See?” - Add Yours
February 1st, 2010 at 6:09 am
I wish my D200 had a built-in GPS like my iPhone. Sure it has a plug where I can connect an external GPS, but that would be too much of a pain. It should just be in there already. That’s all I want!
February 1st, 2010 at 6:10 am
Ala a recent post on the Luminous Landscape – it would be great if cameras could move beyond designs based on winding film from one reel to another.
February 1st, 2010 at 6:21 am
I second the built-in GPS. It’s a pain to manually input photo locations.
I’d like the technology of weather-sealed bodies and magnesium frames on cameras to get more affordable.
February 1st, 2010 at 6:39 am
I think adding GPS for locating pictures, and wi-fi to transfer images to disk, email, social site (facebook, etc.) will both become the norm for dslr and p&s cameras. I would like all my smartphone’s capabilities to be in my next dslr, but I don’t think that will happen too soon.
February 1st, 2010 at 6:53 am
Just some ideas:
1- automatic face recognition with name tagging, so you can easily find your friends and family;
2- some sort of 3D photography;
3- live preview of your shot according to selected ISO, aperture, shutter speed, etc;
4- nice quality projection of your photos so others can see your work (if possible without the need of a wall or plane surface); or connect some sort of eyeglasses to your camera so you can better view the result of your last shot;
5- built-in HDR.
Yeah I know it’s a bit crazy, but some of them would be really nice to have in a near future.
February 1st, 2010 at 6:58 am
Like Michael, I want the camera to embed the GPS data into the photo file.
February 1st, 2010 at 6:59 am
Built in GPS would be cool as a solo feature, but I’d be a lot happier with built in bluetooth or wireless and associated smartphone apps.
Most of the functionality I’d add to a DSLR already exists in my Blackberry – so I want to connect my Canon DSLR to it to snag GPS info, as well as transfer files to the smartphone storage for immediate upload if I want to.
This would also allow bluetooth/wireless tethering to netbooks/laptops
February 1st, 2010 at 7:03 am
I can’t help but think that the next ten years will move consumer cameras and auto modes to the point where no judgement is required at all, but really the area where the work should be getting done is manipulating light without the need for expensive glass, or any glass at all.
February 1st, 2010 at 7:07 am
I’d like to see, unless it already exists, a “note taking” feature where you can drop a little note attached to each photo (i.e location, address, people in the photo, weather, etc…). Could be useful for return trips to a newly discovered place or helping to give a bit of background on a particular photo.
February 1st, 2010 at 7:15 am
Variable ISO – i.e. automatic, built in HDR. I’d put money on this being here in 10 years.
February 1st, 2010 at 7:17 am
- built in GPS, with built-in support within Lightroom
- Single click exposure bracketing (flip mirror up once, take 3 exposures as fast as the shutter setting allows, flip mirror down)
- Built in HDR. Combine exposure bracket shots automatically. Option to keep each image with the HDR as an extra image, or to only save the HDR. Tone mapping probably still needs to be done manually for best results, but ‘picture modes’ could guide initial tone mapping for out-of-the-camera HDR for the masses.
- Localized auto-ISO. When shutter opens, sensor detects light and dark areas and boosts/reduces ISO within each area to create wider dynamic range. In a sense, this becomes single-exposure HDR.
February 1st, 2010 at 7:29 am
In camera HDR is here with Pentax. I would like to see more water/ dust repellant stuff. Maybe some affordable under-water cameras or housings. I am intrigued by some of the fashion under water stuff I have seen.
February 1st, 2010 at 7:33 am
Monitors that are already color corrected…at least the factory doesn’t CRANK THEM UP to bluer than blue…whites. I still haven’t got used to whites being a little yellow…BUT I KNOW when the profile doesn’t load up….ACK!…That’s what I used to look at! No wonder everything would print wrong. :-O
February 1st, 2010 at 7:41 am
Better ISO performances at lower cost.
I believe manufacturers are too involved in the resolution race and should focus in better ISO instead.
I’d rather have a lower resolution camera with a fantastic low-light sensor instead of the reverse.
February 1st, 2010 at 7:49 am
I would like to see improved dynamic range in digital sensors. We already know that digital cameras have a relatively small dynamic range compared to film, which in turn has a VERY small dynamic range compared to the human eye. Any improvements in dynamic range (range of sensitivity to light) would be hugely useful.
Note: this is not the same thing as HDR in-camera — an improved dynamic range would not require software to guess at which parts of which images were exposed correctly — you’d just take a single photo, and have more detail visible in hilights and shadows, right off the bat.
February 1st, 2010 at 7:57 am
João took the words right out of my mouth.
Better and less expensive ISO performance.
February 1st, 2010 at 7:58 am
Better PC integration for DSLRs, for example the ability to set custom modes or ‘sets’ into the firmware prior to a shoot, in a much easier fashion than going through all the menus on the camera and saving them to a limited number of memory slots; better tethering support in software, particularly for Olympus cameras; an inbuilt spirit level, maybe in the viewfinder or a digital one, such as one can use on the iPhone; more universal accessory support – I know this is a pipe dream, but I’m sick of seeing third-party accessories that are only available for Canon or Nikon; internal solid states drives so you have, say, 40Gb internal storage, but retaining a card slot for overspill; WiFi (for various applications – direct Flickr uploads, anyone?) and finally, the option of a prime lens for the ‘kit’ lens – maybe one 35 or 50mm prime and a zoom for a 2-lens kit, rather than making primes a stupidly expensive after-market option?
February 1st, 2010 at 7:59 am
I would like to see
- cheap big sensors compact cameras
- film-like highlights on digital (no ugly clipping)
- film-like exposure lattitude
February 1st, 2010 at 8:13 am
I second the need for better higher ISO performance and wider dynamic range. For me however, an area that needs most improvement is color fidelity. Too much variation between camera’s, but none actually accurate. Add the PS or other software “interpretations” on how they read Nikon or Canon etc. color, and it really is a struggle sometimes. This is particularly notorious in terms of skin tones. At least, this is something I have issue with, but haven’t heard much about it from others online.
February 1st, 2010 at 8:17 am
Some of these have already been noted but I’ll just echo them and add my own:
-Nikon D3s-like ISO performance in a consumer body
-APS-C sensors in compact cameras at an affordable price (and a little more versatile than the Sigma DP line)
-Full frame sensors in consumer bodies
-More dynamic range in a single exposure, even in JPEGs
-Invisible flash (as in the light is not visible to the human eye but it shows up in the photo – I read about this being worked on somewhere…my family hates when I whip out the flash!)
-Faster zooms than even f/2.8 and eventually being consumer priced (read about a Canon f/2 lens being developed…I’m sure it’s huge and costs as much as my car)
-Better AWB, especially in consumer bodies (hate having to tweak it later!)
-Built-in wireless flash transmitter (7D has this, and I wish my T1i had it too!)
I think I have some waiting to do before I see this all realized
February 1st, 2010 at 8:32 am
HDR is just a hack to get around the fact that sensors do not have a high dynamic range. Cameras don’t need HDR, they need sensors with a higher dynamic range to render HDR obsolete.
February 1st, 2010 at 8:35 am
I think a complete physical re-design is in order. DSLR cameras have inherited the form of film cameras. We don’t need a box-like body with a lens attached to its center anymore. Designers should explore more ergonomic and interactive forms. And now that the wireless age has come, think about a module system, e.g. not a single object, but 2 or more parts that can be handheld and that communicate using wi-fi, bluetooth, 3G, etc…
February 1st, 2010 at 8:47 am
I agree with jotasolano; let’s rethink the whole camera – why not a lens system like holding binoculars with a fiber optic connection to a hip or waist pack that holds storage, playback and so forth. As much as I love my 5D Mark II, with big glass it gets heavy. I’d have more mobility and less physical presence, especially when shooting candid.
February 1st, 2010 at 8:58 am
Meta-material lenses instead of glass lenses. Photography needs another innovation on the level of wet to dry film, black and white to color, or film to digital. Enough with the incremental stuff. And don’t get me started on megapickles..
Meta-material lens: http://nextbigfuture.com/2009/12/metamaterial-lens-is-gradient-index.html
February 1st, 2010 at 9:05 am
Canon and Nikon should entry in the real future: Micro 4/3 cameras…
till reach there, Canon should put a view finder on S90…(the best compact camera ever)
make G11 better than S90 and thinner…
G11 should be the mockup for Canon M4/3…
That is alll folks!
February 1st, 2010 at 9:11 am
I’d go beyond built-in HDR, which I think exists already, and say improved dynamic range, as some have mentioned already. Something to match at least human sight and maybe even better.
February 1st, 2010 at 10:50 am
I think we will see wi-fi improvements and down-loadable apps like iPhone. Which will allow emailing of photos, uploading to digital photo-books to have them printed, and large file transfer so you won’t have to down size. And more photo editing en-camera.
Plus more ‘dummy-proof’ picture taking including sophisticated scene analysis, better image stabilization, and faster auto-focus.
Can’t wait!
February 1st, 2010 at 11:53 am
OLED screens on the back of digital cameras. My daughters both have a new Zune HD and the OLED screens on them is simply amazing!
February 1st, 2010 at 12:01 pm
Wireless tethering would be awsome, and it should work with my phone as well.
I hope to see open software, or at least open apis, to be able to program or write programs for my camera. That would allow me to drive camera innovation myself, and to share that innovation with other consumers, and make the C1 and C2 modes of my dial mean something. If one manufacurer starts this, the rest will follow.
February 1st, 2010 at 1:12 pm
Wouldn’t it be nice if all cameras in the future had video capture with a decent microphone?. In the “its all about me department” I would appreciate it if camera manufacturers would develop thinner cameras with full features. I own a DSLR , however, I would love to pack around a thin full featured compact. I do not wear cargo pants everyday. For example, the Canon G11.
February 1st, 2010 at 1:19 pm
Wireless tethering, and touchscreen!
February 1st, 2010 at 1:27 pm
I don’t know if this counts as an “innovation” but I would definitely like to see improved dynamic range. Someone mentioned sensors being able to selectively set ISO across the sensor – this would be very interesting, and provide something of a graduated neutral density filter in camera, only much more flexible.
Personally I think we’re going to see a move to much more mirrorless camera designs like the micro four-thirds cameras. The way they’re headed, at the quality they’re at, they’ll make more sense for the regular amateur photographer than a DSLR.
February 1st, 2010 at 1:34 pm
I’m sad to see that more people are concerned about useless GPS or face recognition than actual photography.
For me… High ISO and NO noise at all.
February 1st, 2010 at 2:03 pm
Oh, I love the idea of totally redesigning the camera into something that easier to hold and more mobile that could transmit data to my computer wirelessly, etc. The big companies like nikon and canon should think like Apple and reinvent themselves before someone else makes them obsolete. Of course none of these innovations can replace the human being behind the camera with the eye for composition and beauty….at least I hope not!
February 1st, 2010 at 2:29 pm
For travelling light I would like to see more programs (eg PS Elements) built into the camera to negate the need to carry laptops and other backup devices. I appreciate the limitation of small screens but maybe you could plug into any TV and use it’s screen. Also the ability then to copy files in camera from one SD card to another for your back-up. You could do it before and after PSE adjustments to retain original info.
February 1st, 2010 at 2:32 pm
What I would like to have is an LCD screen inside the viewfinder.
I would like to be able to see a preview of the image I just captured without having to look on the back of the camera. I’d like to see a real-time histogram of the image I am composing. I’d like the camera to show me exactly where my depth of field is. I like to see crop lines for the various image ratios….
In other words, I would like more data in the viewfinder and I would like that data to be displayed on top of the image as I look at it.
February 1st, 2010 at 2:40 pm
If I could only pick ONE thing out of the hundreds of features, then I simply want extreme high ISO (256000 ISO? 512000 ISO?), and perhaps near night vision capabilities.
February 1st, 2010 at 4:21 pm
1. Greater dynamic range akin to that of print film. It would seem to me that this could be effectuated by doubling the number of sensors, one half of the sensors covering one end of the dynamic range spectrum and the other half covering the other end of the dynamic range spectrum.
2. I would like for Canon’s Prosumer DSLR’s to return to a true depth-of-field mode for the 60D– or if the 60D will be coming out too soon, then doing so with the 70D. Otherwise, Canon should should not have a DOF mode beginning with the 60D/70D — as has been done for the 7D. At present, it’s hit or miss. With the film SLR’s I was able to quickly define what I want to appear to be sharp with 3 quick clicks: first click setting the near parameter of the DOF, second click setting the far parameter of the DOF, third click setting the entire DOF parameters as defined by the first and second clicks. What Canon has at present for the 10D, 20D, 30D, 40D, and 50D is a travesty. It essentially a dupicate of the scenic mode, with the only difference being the the processing parameter.
3, I would like to see Canon concentrate on reducing noise at higher ISO’s, rather than on megapixels. I am, for better or worse, wedded to Canon because of the number of lenses that I own. However, at present, I would recommend Nikon to a new DSLR buyer, instead of Canon.
February 1st, 2010 at 4:25 pm
I want a camera to be just that… a camera. The moment, a camera starts taking too much control is the moment, true photography is dead… though there are many older pros that would say that has already passed.
I don’t want a camera to take too much control, but I would like to see cameras that offer better quality. Not pixel size mind you, but I wouldn’t mind that either. Mainly, I just want camera’s to be able to take pictures in lower light without too much digital noise coming up. I now some people like the grain that comes up at times, but there is definitely a difference between grain and noise. Maybe an option to have clean, high ISO images, and grainy, high ISO images.
February 1st, 2010 at 4:26 pm
II think imagination is the only limit, technology today can find answers to any question….. If I were the product manager of a digital camera I would work to achieve to the following:
1.Smarter and smaller lenses: Let Human Eye be the benchmark in terms of size and vision….with infinite Optical zoom……. Nature is in 3D..isn’t it?
2.Smarter image processing: Auto Composition for beginners (if it can recognize a face, it can recognize any object as The object), Variable ISO, HDR.. some of the things which can improve the quality of the image.
3. Depth of field control…. why can’t one specify depth of field in terms of inch/feet…let the processor decide the aperture/shutter speed combination…
4. Image storage: High def. images stored in a smaller size with lot more information. For eg. today An image looks different on every monitor in terms of the richness of the color…. let the Image, control the dispaly screen to standardize on the way that image is shown…
5. Image transfer: Wifi, Bluetooth, GPS can be very much part of the camera. It should allow you install additional apps to upload/process/edit images directly from the camera.
6. Inbuilt phone – why can’t it have a SIM Card too? The view panel can be touch screen to dial no. – works like a dream with a Bluetooth headset. [although Talking and Clicking could be as deadly as Talking and Driving
]
7. Inbuilt Projector – Like to share an image with friends, don’t have a monitor to see it? Why don’t you use the inbuilt projector?
Have i missed anything? I’m willing to work with one of the camera companies to translate my vision…. this is just the beginning….there are few more, I’ll write about those after 5 years
(All these things can be avoided if we figure out a way to capture every day ‘Moments’ in our memory and transfer it as an image..)
February 1st, 2010 at 5:09 pm
Selectable (and wider) range of sensitivity.
The human eye is sensitive to light with a wavelength in the 400-800nm range. Cameras are too (though some can see a tiny bit into ir)
Let me choose what wavelength I want to record, like I can already select the iso-setting andf white-balance.
February 1st, 2010 at 5:31 pm
Flash sync faster than 1/250 would be nice in 2010
February 1st, 2010 at 5:42 pm
What about a double lensed camera? Even if it’s a compact. Like binoculars, you would focus the lenses closer or farther from each other, and when you press the shutter, you get 2 images. Put them together and voila! 3d images and maybe video!
I also agree with KansaiGreenie. I’m actually rather surprised that the other image ratios aren’t incorporated into the cameras I’ve used… I didn’t even know they existed until watching the “how to crop in lightroom” video posted on the site yesterday!
February 1st, 2010 at 6:59 pm
Hmm some of the things in the posts are all ready in the market and some for sure most be just around the corner.
What I would like to se is a flash sync a lot higher than the one we have today. I would love to sync at 1/8000 sec. with full power, not the pulsing low power solution we have today.
Build in wireless flash triggering and a workable solution for transferring files wirelessly to the computer, the solution currently at the market is just to slow when shooting raw.
Extend the control and usability of the speedlites. They need more power, better control and a system thats alot more user friendly. We really need that build in triggering system so you can control everything from the camera without tons very expensive extra equipment.
A greater dynamic range would be great along with high noise free iso.
What I think we will see…. more pixels
February 1st, 2010 at 7:23 pm
Live View with fast AF and a flip screen for shooting very high/low.
Ability to turn off the built-in IR filter.
A built-in sunset/sunrise/twilight (alarm) clock, using location from built-in GPS.
Feedback on measured color temperature of custom/auto WB so I’d know how to gel my flashes.
Also the already mentioned bigger sensor dynamic range would be great.
February 1st, 2010 at 9:01 pm
1. Sure would like both a GPS and digital compass in my Nikon DSLR … so that not only would it know where I was, but actually what I was taking a picture of (which can easily be calculated based on some formula of GPS position + direction + focal distance)! Would really help with meaningful geotagging.
2. While we’re at it, how about automatic time-syncing based on your current timezone? I’m pretty sure this is possible via the GPS chip.
3. How about a feature where my D60 not only knows when I’ve connected my SB-800 flash unit to it, but actually knows when the flash doesn’t have enough battery power to flash??
4. Or … a white balance preview on my DSLR so that I don’t have to take a picture to actually see how the WB I’ve chosen looks with the current scene? It may have been fixed on the newer DSLRs that have LiveView, but I know even the cheapest $200 point-n-shoots have it!
February 1st, 2010 at 9:34 pm
less noise at higher ISOs
February 1st, 2010 at 9:48 pm
I can see in the not too distant future the ability to have a wireless internet type connection built into the camera so you’ll be able to upload images from the camera no matter where you are in the world. This will be geared towards journalists with deadlines of course, but the technology is there. How much bigger will it make the camera? – who knows.
February 1st, 2010 at 9:59 pm
It’s not true that greater dynamic range sensors would make HDRi redundant – the human eye/brain compresses brightness differences “on the fly” (for example standing inside a room and looking out through the window). So what’s needed is “adaptive brightness compression” in-camera, emulating our own vision. The feature should have a linear control, i.e. you could dial up or down the amount of compression. It would be more similar to the current “D-Lighting” (Nikon) feature than to multi-shot HDR (Pentax).
February 1st, 2010 at 10:37 pm
My two things would be a less noise at higher iso.
and more control over the video output in lower end DSLrs . I can’t wait till the day that you can auto-focus, choose exposure, shutter speed etc fluidly while recording and external mic. The range of lenses and the high iso will be a dream for any budget filmographer.
February 1st, 2010 at 10:37 pm
I’d like an easier sharing-method.
Maybe a USB-port for sharing shots with someone who’s picture you take on the street.
It would be great if I could insert a USB-thumbdriveand copy a photo from my camera to the USB-drive.
Also, I’m desperate for larger sensors in mid range camera’s.
The only disappointment in the EOS 7D for me was the APS-sized sensor.
A full-sized DSLR for about EUR. 1.000,- would be great.
February 1st, 2010 at 10:56 pm
- As others have mentioned built in GPS that works for all file formats.
- High Speed WiFi transfers. Can you image being able to shoot an entire sporting event without having to change a single CF card. That would rock.
- Face Detection in DSLRs. My PowerShot D10 has it and it’s one feature I have used way more than I ever thought I would.
- Camera body redesign. When I buy a new camera body I always buy a battery grip. It would be cool if the camera manufacturer could create a single body and create different cameras simply by replacing the internals. Using Canon as an example – take the body from the 1D series and then put 5D MK II internals or 50D internals in it to create different cameras. This could cut down on the number of different bodies the manufacturer would have to create, they could use common batteries, etc.
February 1st, 2010 at 11:03 pm
Higher ISO performance is something that in 10 years time should be much better than it is now (relative to cost!).
Also with the new 4/3rd cameras I think the size of bodies for high end amateur bodies will shrink significantly.
February 1st, 2010 at 11:06 pm
I’m very pleasantly surprised to see that only 1 or 2 posts out of 51 so far make any mention of video. Are Canon and Nikon listening?
My fondest wish is for my camera to continue being a camera. Better high-ISO capability, increased dynamic range, more flexible built-in flash controls and a higher sync speed are all welcome. Same goes for improvements to focusing speed or accuracy in low-light.
But please, please: don’t turn my camera into a camcorder or phone!
February 1st, 2010 at 11:30 pm
Less emphasis on (somewhat) needless megapixels. More emphasis on good pixels: high performance at high ISO’s, better colors.
February 1st, 2010 at 11:51 pm
Ditto on all the requests for Extended Dynamic Range / Bigger, Better Sensors at consumer prices, / Additional shock and weatherproofing. (I consider the GPS stuff to “already be here” – just not widely implemented yet.)…
What I would like to see is a benefit that extends outside of just digital photography – and that’s a permanent, reliable, portable file-storage system. I’ve got every shot I’ve taken in the “digital age” backed-up at least three times – twice on DVDs (I make two copies of each), and then I have the bulk of them on a 1.5 TB external hard drive. I shoot almost exclusively 10-MP RAW files (Nikon), and I guess I should be glad I’m not shooting in the 24-plus-MP range – ’cause I don’t have to tell you how quickly all that storage space adds up!
Hard drives fail, CD/DVDs aren’t forever, and neither is “Flash” memory. So I don’t know what it is I want … maybe all of the computer files I’ll ever accumulate in my life permanently etched in some diamond-like material that will hold 100-GoogleBytes-per-nanometer and is indestructibly, permanently embedded under my skin. (Bluetooth, mind you … it would be too creepy to be plugging USB cables into my arm.)
Pardon my being ludicrous, but I think you get the picture : maintaining a large collection of files in a permanent way can get cumbersome. And I’ve got the steamer-trunks full of discs to prove it!
February 2nd, 2010 at 12:52 am
Decent, manageable, scalable, affordable, durable, portable storage for a solid, 7 year old, multi-thousand image, 1TB+ image library…
More MP’s, More resolution…
Where the heck are we supposed to store all this stuff!
S
February 2nd, 2010 at 1:04 am
I agree with all of macdane’s thoughts. Why can’t they for example produce a digital camera like the Nikon D90 to use only as a digital Camera. Then offer an optional D90V for those who prefer a camera that includes video. And of course adjust the price accordingly.
Why should you have to pay for something you don’t want or intend or to use.
I am all for improvements, but let us have the choice of a good digital camera, For a camera for others who may have the need for added features.
February 2nd, 2010 at 1:08 am
I used to shoot with a Mamiya RB67 many years ago. The back of the camera had a rotating back so that I could shoot portrait, or landscape with the camera on my tripod, without moving the camera. I’d love to see some type of rotating back on a digital camera.
February 2nd, 2010 at 1:13 am
Bad Image Detection feature so that my slr will lock up if I try to take a bad shot. Also, if the camera could take well composed photos for me that would be great.
February 2nd, 2010 at 1:26 am
I think the industry is heading toward the elimination of the reflex mirror and inclusion of an electronic viewfinder as standard in dSLRs. I know it’s already out there today in some cameras but it will become commonplace. With that, cameras will no longer take single images. They will take short bursts of video at about 25-30 fps at full resolution from which you can select the best shot. Gone will be the mechanical focal plane shutter and the limitation of flash sync speeds.
That said, I’m a traditionalist and will miss the appreciation and satisfaction of capturing a moment in time with one click.
February 2nd, 2010 at 1:26 am
Lightweight, affordable zooms (500mm?).
And a Nikon micro 4/3′s with all the qualities of a D3 (it’;s an innovation wish list, right?)
And just heard from my Nikon dealer that a micro 4/3′s Nikon or Canon might be on the way very soon.
And viewfinders with night vision capabilities
February 2nd, 2010 at 1:29 am
I’d like to see all small-size sensors disappear in all DSLRs. What’s the point…it’s not like the small sensors have reduced DSLR sizes. Use bigger sensors, increase dynamic range, get rid of long exposure noise, improve image quality at all ISOs.
Change the “focus” from more megapixels to better image quality. I would much rather have superb image quality in an 11×14 than have the ability to print 20x30s.
If you’re going to make a DLSR also shoot HD video…provide a means for excellent stereo sound quality. Otherwise, what’s the point?
Develop a system that automatically adjusts color profiles from camera, to image, to monitor, to projector, and to printer. Maybe something in the metadata of an image that handles all of the profiles.
I love a previous suggestion about upgrading the wireless capabilities of cameras. Would be cool to be able to select where an image should be sent, have the image sized accordingly, and have it automatically transmitted. Would be nice to know that as I drove home from a shoot, when I got home, all the images would already be downloaded to my computer.
Who knows what the next paradigm shift will be for photography. Kodak and Polaroid certainly didn’t anticipate digital. Does anyone know a company that’s working on the next generation of photographic equipment?
February 2nd, 2010 at 1:37 am
Combined HDR exposures straight out of the camera could be interesting.
February 2nd, 2010 at 1:42 am
I’d like to second Imre’s call for the ability to disable or easily remove the IR filter. There have been compacts with this functionality, and being able to shoot IR without expensive, risky mods or go-off-and-make-a-cuppa exposures would be muchly good. Bit of a niche market, but I’d bite.
February 2nd, 2010 at 2:06 am
more dynamic range, i.e. more detail in shadows and highlights, not the same as one shot HDR
February 2nd, 2010 at 2:10 am
There are a lot of good ideas in the comments here, so I thought I’d add a few…
One feature from film days that hasn’t made it to digital is the ability to layer several shots on one frame. I used this technique several times with light painting years ago. I know what you are saying, you can just layer your compositions in Photoshop. There is something to be said for in camera editing. I think the latest camera processors are good enough for this task.
HDSLR limitations need to stop. Canon and Nikon have made a new breed of camera, they need to let these models flourish with functionality. One addition to my 7D I would love to see is the ability to manually focus from the back of the camera. Why should I have to pay $$$ for a follow focus, when I could do it with the built in functionality of the camera? I think Magic Lantern is on track for this feature.
HDR integration would be a bad idea in my opinion, just because it is a hack around dynamic range as one commenter pointed out. Give us better customization over auto bracketing with HDR in mind.
I agree that the ergonomics could be substantially improved with a new concept like the Nova.
Put articulating screens on everything!!!!
February 2nd, 2010 at 2:48 am
iI would just like to be able to shoot in lower light (night sports) so i guess the ISO sesativity is on my list. i know i could get more from better lenses but, i’d be willing to pay more for a camera, to save on the lens (us poor folk can’t afford $7,000 for a lens).
February 2nd, 2010 at 3:02 am
I don’t like change, so I’m gonna go with nothing!
February 2nd, 2010 at 3:17 am
the strobist kit:
A wireless flash trasmitter/trigger built in every camera, with a small hot-shoe type adaptor to retrofit old existing speedlights.
February 2nd, 2010 at 5:21 am
Built in HDR… hey, folks. It’s already here. In some Sony DSLRs.
Frankly, the more bells and whistles (including built in HDR) the more there is to go wrong. I want a camera with lenses on which I can control aperture, shutter speed, and decent ISO capabilities (not 32 zillion, though… who really needs that?). I want a good sensor. And some other manual control functions (white balance, exposure). That’s it. That’s all I need and all that I want.
February 2nd, 2010 at 5:51 am
Optical pentaprism view finder with live view capability as well.
February 2nd, 2010 at 6:09 am
I’d like to see a sensor that rotates 90 degrees internally. Of course you can rotate the camera (portrait mode) but with a monopod this is impossible and with a tripod it takes an extra step. And unless you employ a flash bracket, you can’t shoot portrait with the flash properly configured.
February 2nd, 2010 at 7:43 am
DNG as a standard available on all DSLR cameras.
February 2nd, 2010 at 7:57 am
My wish list includes cheaper (fast) lenses, “note taking” would be great as I already do it manually and cheaper full frame sensors with bigger view finders. So called “live view” is literally a pain in the neck if you wear bifocal glasses.
February 2nd, 2010 at 8:32 am
I second the built in level, should be an easy enough option for the right manufacturer to patent/licence. used like a depth of field preview.could be very handy for a lot of people.
we always want more gadgets and features for less dosh. at the end of the day, the settings should be controlled by the person behind the camera, not necessarily the computer inside.
February 2nd, 2010 at 8:36 am
I’d be content with better ISO performance for now, but, for the sake of all those people who want inbuilt GPS/WifI/Bluetooth/SatPhone, etc. we’d all better start praying for better battery life.
February 2nd, 2010 at 9:15 am
3d photography
February 2nd, 2010 at 9:17 am
I would like to have real-time uploading of the photographs I take to my MacBook’s hard drive, no matter where in the world my MacBook is. The camera would store the RAW file onto my CF card as well as send (WiMax?) the RAW file to the computer hard drive of my choice.
I would also like the ability to verbally change the settings on my DSLR with voice commands.
February 2nd, 2010 at 9:59 am
I disagree with Jim Brady’s comment, “I’d like to see all small-size sensors disappear in all DSLRs. What’s the point ….”
With smaller sensors, a photographer doesn’t need to lug around longer focal-length lenses with their much higher weight. For examples, on my 20D, my 500 mm lens is equivalent to an 800 mm lens. and my 75 – 300 mm zoom is equivalent to a 120 – 450 mm zoom,. both retaining the same apertures which would result from using a converter/multiplier. I know someone who bought an 800 mm lens; he, wanted to sell it not long after buying a DSLR with smaller sensors. Full-size sensors are great if you don’t do much photography requiring telephoto lenses. I love the extra reach that my 20D has.
Furthermore, full-sized sensors are a lot more costly to manufacture, which is a reason for the full-sized DSLR’s costing more.
February 2nd, 2010 at 10:04 am
I would like a fully manual camera (except for the auto-focus (must be able to turn it off) and auto-exposure (must be able to turn it off)), no gadgets like “portrait, golf club, twilights, etc. I only need the Shutter, Aperture, ISO modes and off course fully Manual mode.
I would like a camera that can mount many ranges of lenses (12-800mm). And I would like those lenses to cost less (200-400 each).
I would like it to be around 10 mega pixels.
I would like it to have the remote control shutter.
I would like it to be light, easy to handle, not too small or too big.
I would like it to come with many filter lenses (and no software filters).
I would like it with li-poly batteries that can stay on up to 4 hours.
I would like it to have at least a 4 gig memory card included.
I would like it to allow me to film in HD too.
I would like it to have the possibility to mount a tripod & external flash.
I would like it to be under 600$ (400-500 would be nice) without the lenses of course.
I would like the possibility to see what I am to shoot on the LCD screen pior to pressing the shutter button.
I would like ti to be able to shoot in burst, many exposure at a time (3 shots multi-burst -1, 0, +1ev).
It must be able to shot in Jpeg, RAW, and both.
It would have a lot of ISO to choose from and a lot of control over grains.
It would have a 3yr warranty.
Ship it to me for review when it’s built
February 2nd, 2010 at 12:41 pm
I would LOVE, LOVE a quiet shutter release… somehow there must be a way to silence a DSLR camera, so that it doesn’t make noise when you shoot! I work as a still photographer and hate using bulky sound proofing systems…
February 2nd, 2010 at 3:32 pm
im dreamin of a lense with 1.2 constant aperture, 10-800mm, macro, tilt shift…..wow….so ill have all in one lense…juz cant imagine if canon or nikon can make one of this…
February 3rd, 2010 at 5:01 am
Three things I would like to see:
Modular camera base designs. The ability to customize the load out of the actual body of the camera to suit your needs.
HDR/multiple focus lens systems. Adobe teased this about a year or two ago, lenses that take several exposures and focal lengths at once to create a single, layered image that can be manipulated later either in-camera on on the computer to chose the depth of field and exposure you really wanted. Now this would TOTALLY cause and uproar in the artistic photographer community but would be of great advantage to photojournalists who don’t have the time to really setup a shot.
Silent DSLR shutters. Nuff said. I’d love to be able to shoot random people or animals or in a situation where it would be advantageous to not call attention to myself with a noisy snap of the mirror shutter.
February 3rd, 2010 at 6:40 am
1.- I don’t understand why nobody has noticed that one:
My DSLR should have a “third control wheel” exclusively dedicated to manipulate the ISO setting. Since the advent of digital photography, changing the ISO setting (specially in low light conditions) has become as frequent as (for instance) changing the apperture or the shutter speed. However (with current cameras) much more clicks are needed to change the ISO setting than the apperture or the shutter speed. I think the way current cameras modify the ISO setting is a reminiscence of the “old analog times”, when the need to change that setting was pretty rare.
I think it would be very cheap to implment a “third dedicated wheel”, just for the ISO cnfiguration.
2.- This one is more science-fiction:
I liked (at the beginning of the digital photography times) the screens that could be flipped and rotated (almost separated) from the camera body (Mainly in point-and-shoot cameras). This trend has been almost abandoned today, and I think it provided us with very original views. I think they should come back, specially in the DSLR and professional cameras:
I would suggest a camera screen which could be completely seperated from the camera body (wireless communication), and which was also a remote control for some basic camera settings.
3.- It makes no sense for me to merge serious photography and serious video capabilities in the same hardware.
February 3rd, 2010 at 6:56 pm
1. Lower noise at high ISOs. I’d really like shooting at ISO 12800 with as much noise as ISO 400 (on any state of the art DSLR)
2. Higher dynamic range sensor. Built in HDR is obsolete when the sensor itself has a higher dynamic range.
3. Connectivity: Built in wireless oder bluetooth or whatever so the camera can be tethered sans wire without having to buy something for $500.
4. Full size sensor even on the entry-level DSLRs
5. Just a gadget: e-ink focusing screen
February 4th, 2010 at 2:38 am
Full-sized sensors are more expensive that the smaller-sized sendors. DSLRs with full-sized sensors are more expensive that those with smaller-sized sensors.
I have a question for those who want a full-sized sensor for all DSLRs. What price would you be willing to pay?
A half-century ago, Ford Motor Company asked people what they wanted in a car, but did not ask what they would be willing to pay. The result was the Edsel. The price was higher than most people were willing to pay. The Edsel was a good car, but a financial flop. It lasted only three years.
February 4th, 2010 at 2:48 am
re: full size sensors. If they sell more of them the price WILL go down. I bought my first digital P&S several years ago for more than I paid for my DSLR and 2 lenses about 14 months ago. They just need to cut their profit margin a bit initially and then they will make it up with higher sales volume.
February 4th, 2010 at 6:29 am
What else has to be scaled up when a 35mm sized sensor is utilized? I think the pentaprism and the mirror. Additionally a heavier mirror requires more electricity to move it, hence either a more massive batteries or more spares. These add bulk and weight to the SLR body, in no way mitigated by economies of scale. Lenses are massive as is! Do you really want to lug around a massive SLR body?
Don’t get me wrong, I envy the full-frame SLR users, for two reasons: the wide-angle capability and the low-noise behavior of those 35mm size sensors. Recent APS-C SLR cameras already feature vastly reduced noise, and that trend will continue.
As has been suggested in another comment, an SLR without the mirror (and without the prism) might appeal to some. For me, one substantial advantage of an SLR is SLR, i.e., being able to see through an all-optical viewfinder. Following 28 years of film SLR use, I was an avid user of the Olympus C-2100uz for a couple of years, but its eyepiece viewfinder was video, and that experience ultimately convinced me to spring for a DSLR.
Another thought. Technology Review magazine has covered a development in high depth of field. The initial image is barely recognizable, but relatively inexpensive post-processing produces a usable image with focus at any distance of choice: you can produce sharp images of nearby subjects and others of distant subjects from the same single exposure. Ultimately these in turn could be fed to an existing compositing application to produce a final image with very sharp focus from very near to very far.
February 4th, 2010 at 8:44 am
bluetooth and wifi connectivity
February 4th, 2010 at 10:27 am
Unfortunately not always true idb, the bigger the sensor size the higher the likelyhood of manufacturing defects which means a low yield of senors at a higher price.
Same problem with big CPUs in the computer industry.
February 4th, 2010 at 1:08 pm
A fully manual base model Camera body with AF 9 point focusing, spot, ave, eval and centreweighted exposure metering, that has an ISO range from 25 up to 12,600 with no noise and a full frame censor of around 12 megapixels for around $500 body only
February 4th, 2010 at 2:13 pm
1) A sensor with nearly ‘human eye’ dynamic range.
2) Top notch anti-shake built into the sensor of, at the very least, every DSLR.
3) GPS as a standard feature in DSLRs.
4) A more intuitive way to set custom functions with a readout in the display of what the CF actually does instead of, for example, displaying cryptic abbreveations.
February 5th, 2010 at 2:46 am
Dreamer of Pictures Says:
February 4th, 2010 at 6:29 am
“What else has to be scaled up when a 35mm sized sensor is utilized? I think the pentaprism and the mirror. Additionally a heavier mirror requires more electricity to move it, hence either a more massive batteries or more spares. These add bulk and weight to the SLR body, in no way mitigated by economies of scale. Lenses are massive as is! Do you really want to lug around a massive SLR body?”
Actually my old 35mm Minoltas are smaller than my DSLR and they have pentaprisms and mirrors. Everytime I use one I wish I had that big, bright viewfinder on my DSLR. Even so, I would have no objection to a video viewfinder on a DSLR as long as it was showing me what the lens is “seeing”.
February 5th, 2010 at 2:54 am
I would like to see a camera that does not change its design from year to year, one that can be used for ten years or so without six new designs coming up in the interim.
February 5th, 2010 at 3:19 am
Geotagging has to be the next significant feature to be included in digital cameras. It is available now on a few cameras and mobile phones with cameras, but is not yet mainstream.
February 5th, 2010 at 4:29 am
I would like to see automatic settings for capturing specific multiple exposures as well as enhanced spectrum capture that includes infrared and ultraviolet wavelengths. This additional information can be rendered through advanced applications to capture significant detail. I would also like to see settings that would allow tandem cameras, located along the same plane, to function together to capture new POVs that are not locked into the view our brains interpret based on the distance between our eyes.
February 5th, 2010 at 6:48 am
I would like a wireless connection to my camera where I can fully control my camera from the pc and at the same time get the photo that was taken pop right up on my screen for instant review.
After that I would like the higher dynamic range everyone else seems to want, and 50+ megapixels as standard entry level stuff.
Or how about cameras with a tripod that folds directly out of the camera body made of super lightweight material that will not add to weight or size.
February 5th, 2010 at 8:12 am
Wider dynamic range. As already said…
February 5th, 2010 at 8:30 am
I currently have a Canon Rebel XSi.
i’d like to see
1) Higher ISOs, less noise in all ISOs, and higher ISOs for cheaper cameras
2) No more crop bodies
3) weatherproof
4) reduced prices/higher quality in general
5) integrated GPS or more GPS addon modules
6) integrated wifi or bluetooth
and one simple thing that i’d like to see that’s not really an improvement persay, but useful: the ability to have an adjustment range more than 2 stops over and under for the various shooting modes and AEB. i currently have the option for 2 stops either way on my XSi, but i’d like the option to adjust that to 4 or 5 without going to full manual mode.
and another thing that i’d like to see, er, hear, is a more sexy sounding shutter. my friend’s 20D has a satisfying CLICK, whereas mine sounds like a small electric motor whirring. picky, yes, but i like a nice shutter sound.
February 5th, 2010 at 9:46 am
I’m looking forward to the day they make a camera that well teach me how to be a better photographer ,HP
came pertty close with their Photoamart R967, the last high end point and shoot camera they made,it had a lot of explaining in the camera itself which helped guide the uaer to be more creative.
I’d like to see a SLR digital camera like; instead of them expecting you to learn how to use the camera from
booklets some times as thick as a small telephone books, like my Canon Rebel XSi. It seems like every time a new camera is made the companies are assuming the users are atomaticly smarty pants.
Design a camera or computer that teaches the users to learn how to fully use it and the competition well
stand no chance against you!
February 5th, 2010 at 10:25 am
I love my Powershot G9. Someday, I would like to see a similar camera with a full size sensor, 6 frames/sec., low noise and higher resolution at least to ISO 1200. It would be great, but at the present time I really can’t fault the G9 for the great performance and convenience from such a small camera. The hot shoe is very important to me.
February 5th, 2010 at 10:56 am
I hope camera manufactures would stop making still cameras into video cameras and instead concentrate their efforts into making more efficient, less noise producing cameras. And please
put HDR into still cameras!
February 5th, 2010 at 11:48 am
I wish the manufacturers could invent a small flash as big as a dime, remote controlled, it can fly overhead and can illuminate a whole football field!
February 5th, 2010 at 1:30 pm
PRINTS and Printing. I think Kodak has a Idea of cheaper ink. While many people are “online” just as many and or more are not.
I hate that many pictures are now shared or viewed on a 2 inch square via a PDA or Cell phone. Photography needs a way to print pictures out fast, good and cheap or a version of Kindle about book size to view pictures.
February 5th, 2010 at 5:08 pm
How about capturing three images?
Capturing images with the smell of a location?
February 5th, 2010 at 5:54 pm
If we are still taking still photographs I want my camera to do just that. So keep it simple – if you want all the technology get Apple to add a good lens system to its phone.
No moving parts in the camera body.
Lightness – why not plastic leses, those in my glasses have lasted 3 year without getting scratched.
Get rid of the marketting boys who add a new gimmick every year and then tell us that the new model will somehow make us better photographers.
February 5th, 2010 at 7:48 pm
What about something really usefull like neutral grad filters, There must be a billion photos out there with white sky’s, I guess it would be easily do able just a matter of lowering the sensitivity locally
February 5th, 2010 at 8:11 pm
In order to cramp too much its unfortunate that we left some good old dials behind, i want them back.
1. Shutter speed dial like those days
2. Aperture ring and depth of field chart on lens
3. Top LCD
February 5th, 2010 at 8:22 pm
voice recognition, direction. setting the camera up without changing your pose, great for sports photography…
February 5th, 2010 at 8:46 pm
It would be awesome to have a sliding scale White balance that you can adjust on the fly while having your eye to the eyepiece – as doing currently with exposure
February 5th, 2010 at 9:14 pm
I have enjoyed reading everyone’s comments
A Camera case that lets you slip out your camera quickly so you don’t miss an unexpected shot. I don’t even use a camera case because if it’s in the case when you spot a shot, chances are you miss it. And that includes when you are driving.
Everyone here who mentioned a better way to store pictures should get together and make that a reality.
The Flash. There has to be some improvement on the control of the flash.
I started as a highschool student with an enlarger in my basement, so Digital Photography is more than I could of imagined, but thankfully others did. Not only are we blessed with being photographers, how many other people see,capture, and remember like we do, but we are able to take advantage of the innovations that have come and to maybe contribute to the innovations yet to be made.
February 6th, 2010 at 4:24 am
I am not a visionary, but I would love:
a full frame SLR that costs $1,000, and
ISO performance that’s 4 times better than today’s performance so that an f4.0 lens would give performance better than a 2.8 today.
February 7th, 2010 at 9:02 pm
It’s not exactly an innovation but I’d like to be able to take multiple exposures using a digital camera just like I could on film.
The technology shouldn’t be too difficult, surely. It just means holding the image on the sensor until all exposures are taken before moving it to the memory card.
February 7th, 2010 at 9:50 pm
I haven’t read all the comments yet but if someone has already suggested this then I want to add my voice too.
My only real desire is in terms of P&S – please please please forget higher and higher resolutions – just make it possible to record the picture you’ve taken as opposed to one half an hour afterwards… surely it must be possible to eliminate lag?
February 9th, 2010 at 6:00 pm
I would like to see a very basic DSLR with the following specs: Nikon F Mount or M42, Fullformat Sensor 24MP 200-6400 ASA, No automatic programs or AF, just a few controls. Lightmeter spot/integral linked or stopped-down might be necessary. And MUP and changeable viewfinder (waistlevel!). A mixture of a Nikon F2 and a state-of-art digitalback. I would pay more than 2000$ for it!
February 10th, 2010 at 5:09 pm
True live preview as in the Olympus E-330 with rotatable rear screen. I love the freedom to shoot from ground level without having to lie on the ground
February 20th, 2010 at 11:29 am
Years ago in the ’70′s someone came out with a prototype of a replacement for film. It was a film canister with a tab sticking out that received the image. I kept the article for years. The only thing in the world that is universal is 35mm film. If that project had gottten off the ground think of the potential of it in all 35mm cameras,. Back then digital wasn’t even thought of. That would be the untimate invention. The 35mm automatic camera has the iso info so it does all of the calculating. You just need a storage medium and playback capabilities.
I wish my Sony a200 had the depth of field and mirror lockup. They make new cameras and delete the good features of the older models. This is also true of 35mm. I wish the cameras didn’t have to “get it right or not shoot the picture”. I have lost several shots due to the bracket etc. not being within the range. Give me something. Sometimes you don’t have time to screw with the adjustments. That’s why I’m using a cut down .308 gunstock and remote trigger. Beats setting up a tripod to catch a deer on the run.
February 20th, 2010 at 11:36 am
Just thought of another one. How about a screen you can see in the daylight. I like the viewfinder on the A200 but to review it I have to use the LCD screen in the birght sun. Bummer. Have to wait til I get home to see what I got.. The tape on glare shades don’t work either.
Leave a Reply