<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Urban Landscape Photography Tips</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digital-photography-school.com/urban-landscape-photography-tips/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/urban-landscape-photography-tips</link>
	<description>Discover how to use your digital camera with our Digital Photography Tips. We are a community of photographers of all experience levels who come together to learn, share and grow in our understanding of photography.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:37:20 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: john john alabata</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/urban-landscape-photography-tips/comment-page-1#comment-71836</link>
		<dc:creator>john john alabata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 11:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/urban-landscape-photography-tips/#comment-71836</guid>
		<description>Since last year, DPS has been very helpful in improving my photography skills , and when i shall be in NYC this Dec, these tips will surely help me a lot.   Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since last year, DPS has been very helpful in improving my photography skills , and when i shall be in NYC this Dec, these tips will surely help me a lot.   Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex - Photographer from Suffolk</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/urban-landscape-photography-tips/comment-page-1#comment-71510</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex - Photographer from Suffolk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/urban-landscape-photography-tips/#comment-71510</guid>
		<description>I love urban landscapes. 

I used to shoot a whole load of them when I was a student, but now I live in the countryside,  don&#039;t get a chance much anymore. :(

Something to also consider is this: If there is a plaza surrounded by tall buildings, crack on a wideangle, lie on your back in the plaza and shoot up at the sky. 

It makes for amazing abstract form construction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love urban landscapes. </p>
<p>I used to shoot a whole load of them when I was a student, but now I live in the countryside,  don&#8217;t get a chance much anymore. :(</p>
<p>Something to also consider is this: If there is a plaza surrounded by tall buildings, crack on a wideangle, lie on your back in the plaza and shoot up at the sky. </p>
<p>It makes for amazing abstract form construction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jucacu</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/urban-landscape-photography-tips/comment-page-1#comment-49602</link>
		<dc:creator>jucacu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/urban-landscape-photography-tips/#comment-49602</guid>
		<description>I just wonder why it is called &quot;urban landscape&quot; when a landscape to me means an open area with a wide view, while most of this pictures are of doorways and windows, buildings and streets that are more of urban details than landscape appreciation. Does anyone see my point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wonder why it is called &#8220;urban landscape&#8221; when a landscape to me means an open area with a wide view, while most of this pictures are of doorways and windows, buildings and streets that are more of urban details than landscape appreciation. Does anyone see my point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucian</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/urban-landscape-photography-tips/comment-page-1#comment-47216</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 05:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/urban-landscape-photography-tips/#comment-47216</guid>
		<description>Great tips, thank you !

Important the notice on copyright as well. Without trying to kick-off a new thread - there is no &#039;emphasis&#039; on the model release. As far as i know (have read quite a few articles, but not a &#039;definitive answer&#039; ), anything you photograph has your copyright, so you do not need the model release. Of course, you can get your arse kicked if you take a photo of somebody bigger than you who simply doesn&#039;t ant his photo to be taken, or your ex may be pissed of for seeing her nude photo in a magazine. The release form should describe what you can do with the photographs, not if you have the copyright. am I right :) ?

Is there a &#039;definitive guide&#039; ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great tips, thank you !</p>
<p>Important the notice on copyright as well. Without trying to kick-off a new thread &#8211; there is no &#8216;emphasis&#8217; on the model release. As far as i know (have read quite a few articles, but not a &#8216;definitive answer&#8217; ), anything you photograph has your copyright, so you do not need the model release. Of course, you can get your arse kicked if you take a photo of somebody bigger than you who simply doesn&#8217;t ant his photo to be taken, or your ex may be pissed of for seeing her nude photo in a magazine. The release form should describe what you can do with the photographs, not if you have the copyright. am I right :) ?</p>
<p>Is there a &#8216;definitive guide&#8217; ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunnyman</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/urban-landscape-photography-tips/comment-page-1#comment-38801</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunnyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 09:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/urban-landscape-photography-tips/#comment-38801</guid>
		<description>Nair: This can be done in various ways. For instance, you can set that in the camera. Then the built-in camera software will try to enhance the borders between different color areas, thereby creating a sense of greater sharpness.

Basically the same thing, but with much more control, can also be done using software like Photoshop (I use that all the time in my post-processing).

If overdone, it can indeed create a &quot;grainy&quot; feeling, the trick is to do it right.

Kai, @ www.a1phototips.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nair: This can be done in various ways. For instance, you can set that in the camera. Then the built-in camera software will try to enhance the borders between different color areas, thereby creating a sense of greater sharpness.</p>
<p>Basically the same thing, but with much more control, can also be done using software like Photoshop (I use that all the time in my post-processing).</p>
<p>If overdone, it can indeed create a &#8220;grainy&#8221; feeling, the trick is to do it right.</p>
<p>Kai, @ <a href="http://www.a1phototips.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.a1phototips.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nic</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/urban-landscape-photography-tips/comment-page-1#comment-20425</link>
		<dc:creator>Nic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 14:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/urban-landscape-photography-tips/#comment-20425</guid>
		<description>In responce to Nair, you would have to explain what you mean by &#039;increasing sharpness&#039; i presue you mean in the processing stage using software to increase sharpness?? and if so in photoshop for example increasing sharpness will increase the noise (grains) in the photograph.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In responce to Nair, you would have to explain what you mean by &#8216;increasing sharpness&#8217; i presue you mean in the processing stage using software to increase sharpness?? and if so in photoshop for example increasing sharpness will increase the noise (grains) in the photograph.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nair sreedhar</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/urban-landscape-photography-tips/comment-page-1#comment-20410</link>
		<dc:creator>nair sreedhar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 03:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/urban-landscape-photography-tips/#comment-20410</guid>
		<description>Hi
I have a question. When we increase the sharpness, will it not lead to grains in the photo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi<br />
I have a question. When we increase the sharpness, will it not lead to grains in the photo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nic</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/urban-landscape-photography-tips/comment-page-1#comment-18674</link>
		<dc:creator>Nic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 02:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/urban-landscape-photography-tips/#comment-18674</guid>
		<description>Just to help out anyone stumbling on this site about the copyright of buildings.....
&#039;In general, buildings erected after December 1, 1990 do not pose a big problem either. There is a â€œphotographerâ€™s exceptionâ€ to a buildingâ€™s copyright ownerâ€™s rights that permits the photography of buildings. This gives a wide leeway to the definition of â€œbuildingâ€; everything from gazebos to office towers are included. As long as the building is in a public place, or visible â€” and photographable â€” from a public place, there is no infringement of the buildingâ€™s copyright ownerâ€™s rights. This rule includes private as well as public buildings.&#039;
&quot;http://www.asmp.org/commerce/legal/copyright/publicbldg.php&quot;

that may give an insight into what you can and cannot shoot or rather what you wont get in trouble for =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to help out anyone stumbling on this site about the copyright of buildings&#8230;..<br />
&#8216;In general, buildings erected after December 1, 1990 do not pose a big problem either. There is a â€œphotographerâ€™s exceptionâ€ to a buildingâ€™s copyright ownerâ€™s rights that permits the photography of buildings. This gives a wide leeway to the definition of â€œbuildingâ€; everything from gazebos to office towers are included. As long as the building is in a public place, or visible â€” and photographable â€” from a public place, there is no infringement of the buildingâ€™s copyright ownerâ€™s rights. This rule includes private as well as public buildings.&#8217;<br />
&#8220;http://www.asmp.org/commerce/legal/copyright/publicbldg.php&#8221;</p>
<p>that may give an insight into what you can and cannot shoot or rather what you wont get in trouble for =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/urban-landscape-photography-tips/comment-page-1#comment-17768</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 19:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/urban-landscape-photography-tips/#comment-17768</guid>
		<description>some real good points!
i particularly keen on strange view points
try to get right underneath or above or snap parts not seen by others

its kind of like when u can see the strings of a pupet but on a building</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>some real good points!<br />
i particularly keen on strange view points<br />
try to get right underneath or above or snap parts not seen by others</p>
<p>its kind of like when u can see the strings of a pupet but on a building</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/urban-landscape-photography-tips/comment-page-1#comment-9546</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/urban-landscape-photography-tips/#comment-9546</guid>
		<description>I would like to investigate Devyn&#039;s assertion that you can always photograph from a sidewalk or public thoroughfare. As a journalist or as an artist or hobbyist maybe, but don&#039;t ever let the owners of the Chrysler Building catch you using the image of their building for advertising!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to investigate Devyn&#8217;s assertion that you can always photograph from a sidewalk or public thoroughfare. As a journalist or as an artist or hobbyist maybe, but don&#8217;t ever let the owners of the Chrysler Building catch you using the image of their building for advertising!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
