<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Pros and Cons of Using Teleconverters (Extenders) on your DSLR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digital-photography-school.com/the-pros-and-cons-of-using-tele-converters-extenders-on-your-dslr/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/the-pros-and-cons-of-using-tele-converters-extenders-on-your-dslr</link>
	<description>Discover how to use your digital camera with our Digital Photography Tips. We are a community of photographers of all experience levels who come together to learn, share and grow in our understanding of photography.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:33:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John O'Brien</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/the-pros-and-cons-of-using-tele-converters-extenders-on-your-dslr/comment-page-1#comment-40278</link>
		<dc:creator>John O'Brien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 04:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/the-pros-and-cons-of-using-tele-converters-extenders-on-your-dslr/#comment-40278</guid>
		<description>Good evening,I have both the Nikon D40 &amp; D40X,I have the Quantary 2XDG,I have found it disables the AF-S funtion on Nikon lenses,I suspect it disables the VR function as well.I have several non auto focus for these cameras &amp; use the Tele Converter on them.it will cause less light so one will have to adjust arpiture &amp; shuter speed with this accesory.I use the converter mainly out side with camera mounted on a tripod for wild life shots &amp; landscape photos when a &quot;&quot;fast&quot;lens &amp; fast auto focus is not neccesary.
I would have bought the Nikon model for a lot more bucks but got this due to the price &amp; if I lied it I was planning on the Nikon model but it does the same thing concerning the AF-S function.
 I would recomend it as it is fun to play with but remember it has its limatations.
ps: it does work well with the 50mm Nikor af 1.8</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good evening,I have both the Nikon D40 &amp; D40X,I have the Quantary 2XDG,I have found it disables the AF-S funtion on Nikon lenses,I suspect it disables the VR function as well.I have several non auto focus for these cameras &amp; use the Tele Converter on them.it will cause less light so one will have to adjust arpiture &amp; shuter speed with this accesory.I use the converter mainly out side with camera mounted on a tripod for wild life shots &amp; landscape photos when a &#8220;&#8221;fast&#8221;lens &amp; fast auto focus is not neccesary.<br />
I would have bought the Nikon model for a lot more bucks but got this due to the price &amp; if I lied it I was planning on the Nikon model but it does the same thing concerning the AF-S function.<br />
 I would recomend it as it is fun to play with but remember it has its limatations.<br />
ps: it does work well with the 50mm Nikor af 1.8</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SueQ54172</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/the-pros-and-cons-of-using-tele-converters-extenders-on-your-dslr/comment-page-1#comment-17461</link>
		<dc:creator>SueQ54172</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 04:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/the-pros-and-cons-of-using-tele-converters-extenders-on-your-dslr/#comment-17461</guid>
		<description>Question...I have a Canon G7.  It&#039;s not a DSLR but will a teleconverter have the same effect as far as less light being able to enter the camera?  I just ordered a package with a teleconverter and a wide angle attachment and I didn&#039;t know about this.  Will the wide angle have the same effect too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question&#8230;I have a Canon G7.  It&#8217;s not a DSLR but will a teleconverter have the same effect as far as less light being able to enter the camera?  I just ordered a package with a teleconverter and a wide angle attachment and I didn&#8217;t know about this.  Will the wide angle have the same effect too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knafland</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/the-pros-and-cons-of-using-tele-converters-extenders-on-your-dslr/comment-page-1#comment-16625</link>
		<dc:creator>knafland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 07:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/the-pros-and-cons-of-using-tele-converters-extenders-on-your-dslr/#comment-16625</guid>
		<description>Well, mine is only F4....no IS :( Anyway, if any of you guys have some photos, where difference with and without converter is shown (regular photos), please contact me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, mine is only F4&#8230;.no IS :( Anyway, if any of you guys have some photos, where difference with and without converter is shown (regular photos), please contact me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/the-pros-and-cons-of-using-tele-converters-extenders-on-your-dslr/comment-page-1#comment-16568</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 20:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/the-pros-and-cons-of-using-tele-converters-extenders-on-your-dslr/#comment-16568</guid>
		<description>Knafland - Mine is the f4 IS too....the 2.8? If only!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Knafland &#8211; Mine is the f4 IS too&#8230;.the 2.8? If only!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knafland</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/the-pros-and-cons-of-using-tele-converters-extenders-on-your-dslr/comment-page-1#comment-16565</link>
		<dc:creator>knafland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 19:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/the-pros-and-cons-of-using-tele-converters-extenders-on-your-dslr/#comment-16565</guid>
		<description>Looks like all of you guys have 2.8 IS, while i am still at the F4 one like the author of this article (i suppose). Do you have any images for comparision with and without the extender, as i see  that the examples in given tests are looking quite bad :(

Thanks in advance!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like all of you guys have 2.8 IS, while i am still at the F4 one like the author of this article (i suppose). Do you have any images for comparision with and without the extender, as i see  that the examples in given tests are looking quite bad :(</p>
<p>Thanks in advance!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Helman</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/the-pros-and-cons-of-using-tele-converters-extenders-on-your-dslr/comment-page-1#comment-16560</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Helman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/the-pros-and-cons-of-using-tele-converters-extenders-on-your-dslr/#comment-16560</guid>
		<description>I use an Olympus 1.5 on my Panasonic FZ 50 p&amp;s with 12X zoom.
I find that astabilizatio works fine provided all other conditions are met such as good light. But there often is degredation. Stabilization fails in lower light at max zoom so I have to both increase light and back off full zoom. But that being said the zoom lens can be as bad in poor light.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use an Olympus 1.5 on my Panasonic FZ 50 p&amp;s with 12X zoom.<br />
I find that astabilizatio works fine provided all other conditions are met such as good light. But there often is degredation. Stabilization fails in lower light at max zoom so I have to both increase light and back off full zoom. But that being said the zoom lens can be as bad in poor light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/the-pros-and-cons-of-using-tele-converters-extenders-on-your-dslr/comment-page-1#comment-16549</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/the-pros-and-cons-of-using-tele-converters-extenders-on-your-dslr/#comment-16549</guid>
		<description>A timely piece this, for me, as I&#039;m considering the option of an extender.

The one question I do have is regarding Image Stabilisation. If I use my 70-200IS with an extender will I still have use of the IS. I tend to think I wouldn&#039;t as the stabilisation wouldn&#039;t carry through to the teleconverter....but just want to check I&#039;m correct on that assumption. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A timely piece this, for me, as I&#8217;m considering the option of an extender.</p>
<p>The one question I do have is regarding Image Stabilisation. If I use my 70-200IS with an extender will I still have use of the IS. I tend to think I wouldn&#8217;t as the stabilisation wouldn&#8217;t carry through to the teleconverter&#8230;.but just want to check I&#8217;m correct on that assumption. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudolf Leitgeb</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/the-pros-and-cons-of-using-tele-converters-extenders-on-your-dslr/comment-page-1#comment-16546</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudolf Leitgeb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/the-pros-and-cons-of-using-tele-converters-extenders-on-your-dslr/#comment-16546</guid>
		<description>There is a comparison of Canon and Kenko teleconverters on http://www.traumflieger.de/objektivtest/telekonverter/telekonverter_check.php

Note, that the page is in german, but enen for the non german speakers of you the images should tell you a lot, especially if you scroll down to the comparison test images.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a comparison of Canon and Kenko teleconverters on <a href="http://www.traumflieger.de/objektivtest/telekonverter/telekonverter_check.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.traumflieger.de/objektivtest/telekonverter/telekonverter_check.php</a></p>
<p>Note, that the page is in german, but enen for the non german speakers of you the images should tell you a lot, especially if you scroll down to the comparison test images.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raghu P</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/the-pros-and-cons-of-using-tele-converters-extenders-on-your-dslr/comment-page-1#comment-16541</link>
		<dc:creator>Raghu P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 04:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/the-pros-and-cons-of-using-tele-converters-extenders-on-your-dslr/#comment-16541</guid>
		<description>Nice article well explained. 
A question:- Will Image stabilization (IS) continue to work with a TC mounted ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article well explained.<br />
A question:- Will Image stabilization (IS) continue to work with a TC mounted ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xavier</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/the-pros-and-cons-of-using-tele-converters-extenders-on-your-dslr/comment-page-1#comment-16486</link>
		<dc:creator>xavier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 13:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/the-pros-and-cons-of-using-tele-converters-extenders-on-your-dslr/#comment-16486</guid>
		<description>i was considering about adding a teleconverter to my 70-200, but found the price at nikon quite high. I did not think about aternatives such as Sigma&#039;s and kenko&#039;s thanks for the tip.
Also i guess i will loose the VR, not a big deal, but i have to check that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i was considering about adding a teleconverter to my 70-200, but found the price at nikon quite high. I did not think about aternatives such as Sigma&#8217;s and kenko&#8217;s thanks for the tip.<br />
Also i guess i will loose the VR, not a big deal, but i have to check that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
