Shooting for Stock Photography Sites
Love them or hate them image libraries are a great way of generating an extra revenue stream, and because the websites don’t discriminate against people who aren’t classed as ‘professional photographers’, advanced enthusiasts and amateurs have just as much chance of selling as the pros. But as with all areas of photography the market is competitive and what you may want to supply could become lost in an ocean of clone like frames or may not contain enough of the correct keywords to get noticed. So here are a few ideas that may help you get started.
Start with some solid research to discover what is and isn’t popular. Log on to stock sites (for example: Crestock, Fololia, 123rf or Shutter Stock) and sort the frames using the popularity filter. This will display the most sought after images, allowing you to gauge the level of talent you are up against. Locate the genre you are particularly interested and see how images are received. If the download rate is poor or there is a vast quantity of similar frames then it is probably not worthwhile submitting large quantities to this area. Some libraries display lists of required and non required images with the submission guidelines. Categories such as landscapes, pets, flowers and sunsets are generally oversubscribed and as such only exceptional frames are accepted. Don’t be deterred though, take a creative approach to shooting these genres and you could find your images are chosen because they fill a gap in the website’s collection.
Currently undersubscribed areas include; travel photography of extreme places and nature, people in various situations and convincing lifestyle shots. Lifestyle portraits that include uniforms or props are big sellers and those featuring retro props are superb for conveying a message. For example an old fashioned telephone visually illustrates communication regardless time or place. Motion-blur and creative effect images are also in demand but be sure to always keep intention and composition priority.
There are many sites to choose from so to help narrow down the search for ones that suit you read the small print in the terms and conditions thoroughly. Make a point of establishing the answer to questions like: is it possible to contribute to other libraries? How much commission does the site take? What are the terms of cancellation? What are the minimum requirements for image size/resolution? How many uploads are allowed per week? Furthermore decide whether you want to sell your images on a royalty free basis (anyone can use the file for whatever purpose as many times as they like) or on an issue managed/exclusive license basis (sold for a specific use, time and territory). Create a database to help keep track of the images you have submitted to which sites and under what terms and conditions.
Don’t kid yourself that this is going to be a get rich quick scheme. Shooting, editing and uploading files is a time-consuming chore. Most veteran stock site suppliers say it can take up to five years to become established and earn a decent amount from the libraries. To increase your sales you should upload regularly, shoot a variety of genres and think like a customer. The design community is one of the largest demographics buying from these sites, so ask yourself what a designer would want from an image. Frames that contain isolated objects are ideal for designers as it offers flexibility in placing copy, so experiment with spacious compositions and keep the entire subject visible. Shoot against white backgrounds as this will make it easier for designers to manually remove the background. You don’t need an expensive white back drop for this, just use a simple white bed sheet, table cloth or piece of card. Where possible include clipping paths, keep edges clean and smooth, be aware of shadows caused by flash and avoid excessive feathering or jagged edges.
Images have to be executed to perfection to pass the rigorous acceptance process, so pay close attention to the histogram when capturing and view every image at 100% to spot dust marks or imperfections. Save yourself time and effort cloning during the editing phase by correcting problems during the shoot, for example sweep away flyaway hairs from the model’s face or change clothes showing unwanted logos or text. Images revealing high levels of noise or colour distortion are likely to be rejected too, so use a program like Neat Image or Noise Ninja to correct problem areas without affecting the overall quality.
Search engines obviously don’t see the picture only the keywording that goes with it, so give your photography the best chance to be seen and hopefully increase sales by attaching plenty of relevant words to describe it. Be sure not to add irrelevant words as some sites penalize photographers and some will only accept keywords matching their own vocabulary.

13 Responses to “Shooting for Stock Photography Sites” - Add Yours
March 5th, 2010 at 6:21 am
Thanks for sharing. I tried to look for your images (via your referral link id) on the sites you recommended but your portfolio is empty. Would be interesting to see what you are submitting to these sites.
March 5th, 2010 at 6:37 am
I am a big fan of the advice fix problems during the photoshoot. A quality photoshoot is the best way to produce great photographs.
March 5th, 2010 at 9:44 am
I went to the first site on your list {Crestock) and they pay you 30% of what the image brings. Is this standard?
March 5th, 2010 at 11:58 am
Great topic! It’s just what I am looking for. Thank you.
March 5th, 2010 at 5:06 pm
Perhaps the author should talk about the referral system those (micro)stock sites have implemented, and how she will earn some money from the links posted in the article: when someone joins using one of those links, she will get some of the subsequent revenue generated by the newcomer.
So the author certainly has a monetary interest to create a good impression about (micro)stock sites and encourage people to join. While I am not implying that the article is biased, I think people should know.
March 6th, 2010 at 10:38 pm
While stock sites is certainly not for me, there is a huge market for them. And some people can make decent money shooting stock- but very few do.
It’s funny that I won’t shoot stock, but I’ll buy it. I feel a little bad each time I go to a stock site and buy an image for a few dollars. I always think to myself that it’s so undervalued. But that is what has happened to photography- everyone can pick up a camera and post to a stock house. The best (who get paid the most) work for places like Getty Images, and the price of those images certainly show (I rarely buy from Getty).
All I can add is look for images that are underrepresented. Istock does a good job of letting people know what images are being requested so you can get out there and shoot to fill those voids.
And the better the image- the more likely you are going to sell (this is always true). However, when you shoot stock, think about what these images are going to be used for. Shoot with the thought that most stock images are going to be used in websites or business newsletter media and will be background images. Stock images are not art- they are going to have a purpose. Think about what you might need or want for a specific industry and shoot with that in mind.
March 7th, 2010 at 3:58 am
Have a look at Alamy. They pay 60% to the photographer and sell at proper ( non micro ) prices. They do not edit for content so the only barrier is technical and it really isn’t hard.
March 7th, 2010 at 1:50 pm
30% doesn’t sound bad at all. First of all your are viewed by an audience that you may never reach on your own. Mostly profit without the hassle of running a website yourself.
March 9th, 2010 at 11:57 pm
I wonder, is it possible to submit the same photo to more than one stock image website at the same time? kinda like trying to maximize your chance of profit and getting it seen?
March 12th, 2010 at 6:02 am
Will marking your pics “exclusive” result in greater possibility of making a sale? Also, why does the application (to a stock website) ask whether you are joining other stock sites? Will this deter in possible acceptance or exposure on their site? I am researching the stock industry myself and am interested in knowing whether I should be exclusive to one site or join them all.
March 12th, 2010 at 6:15 am
Of the couple times tried to upload a few photos, I was told they weren’t correct. After contacting them, I found out they only want things in RGB. Another message was send to them explaining the massive amount of megabites I had and that I could provide sRGB, Adobe RGB, RAW, and TIFF. They still insisted it was wrong.
After several other “pros” told me they didn’t know what they were talking about, I just let them go and just forgot stock photos all together.
March 12th, 2010 at 6:58 am
Hi, my name is Dherek Abernathy and I’m with http://www.productiontrax.com. We are looking photographers that want to show their hard work to the world. Fill free to check us out online or Email us for any questions at DherekONL@Gmail.com.
March 15th, 2010 at 9:15 am
A newcomer in the microstock industry is http://www.kosherstock.com. Kosherstock focuses on the Jewish world. Photos of the Jewish culture and religion as well as photos of Israel landmarks.
Leave a Reply