<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon Coolpix L100</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digital-photography-school.com/nikon-coolpix-l100/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/nikon-coolpix-l100</link>
	<description>Discover how to use your digital camera with our Digital Photography Tips. We are a community of photographers of all experience levels who come together to learn, share and grow in our understanding of photography.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:19:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/nikon-coolpix-l100/comment-page-1#comment-80379</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 15:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=3604#comment-80379</guid>
		<description>@JP Lumansoc...

Kinda harsh there?

The article on this page is clearly not, nor did it seem intended to be a review (the blog owner seems to clearly mark the titles of articles &quot;review&quot; when they actually are... otherwise, he is just talking about the equipment as is the category here).  This was a blurb posted about a camera, which at the time was just announced and somewhat unique in feature set and not even available for purchase yet, that he thought was interesting enough to post the limited info that Nikon made available onto his web site.

I&#039;m sorry you didn&#039;t find the information you were looking for here, but I think you are a bit harsh in telling someone what they &quot;should be&quot; providing &lt;b&gt;you&lt;/b&gt;, &lt;i&gt;&quot;You should be comparing this camera to other cameras and giving reasons why this is better or worse. Save your time and just put a link to Nikon’s website. Better question yet, have you used this camera extensively?&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

With that said, I have used this camera extensively (for several months now) and would be happy to answer any questions you might have.  Since I don&#039;t own any other cameras at the moment, it would be difficult to compare other than what I mentioned in my previous comment was part of my decision making process in buying this point and shoot camera over a Digital SLR (hint: not the price).

When shopping for this camera, I used &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.trustedreviews.com/digital-cameras/review/2009/04/25/Nikon-Coolpix-L100/p1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this excellent and exhaustive review on the Trusted Reviews web site&lt;/a&gt; to help make my decision and compare to the actual image quality of some low-end Digital SLR cameras I was also considering at the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@JP Lumansoc&#8230;</p>
<p>Kinda harsh there?</p>
<p>The article on this page is clearly not, nor did it seem intended to be a review (the blog owner seems to clearly mark the titles of articles &#8220;review&#8221; when they actually are&#8230; otherwise, he is just talking about the equipment as is the category here).  This was a blurb posted about a camera, which at the time was just announced and somewhat unique in feature set and not even available for purchase yet, that he thought was interesting enough to post the limited info that Nikon made available onto his web site.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry you didn&#8217;t find the information you were looking for here, but I think you are a bit harsh in telling someone what they &#8220;should be&#8221; providing <b>you</b>, <i>&#8220;You should be comparing this camera to other cameras and giving reasons why this is better or worse. Save your time and just put a link to Nikon’s website. Better question yet, have you used this camera extensively?&#8221;</i></p>
<p>With that said, I have used this camera extensively (for several months now) and would be happy to answer any questions you might have.  Since I don&#8217;t own any other cameras at the moment, it would be difficult to compare other than what I mentioned in my previous comment was part of my decision making process in buying this point and shoot camera over a Digital SLR (hint: not the price).</p>
<p>When shopping for this camera, I used <a href="http://www.trustedreviews.com/digital-cameras/review/2009/04/25/Nikon-Coolpix-L100/p1" rel="nofollow">this excellent and exhaustive review on the Trusted Reviews web site</a> to help make my decision and compare to the actual image quality of some low-end Digital SLR cameras I was also considering at the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP Lumansoc</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/nikon-coolpix-l100/comment-page-1#comment-80102</link>
		<dc:creator>JP Lumansoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 04:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=3604#comment-80102</guid>
		<description>I gotta call you out on this one, if you&#039;re going to write a review, write your own instead of paraphrasing what Nikon says about their cameras. You should be comparing this camera to other cameras and giving reasons why this is better or worse. Save your time and just put a link to Nikon&#039;s website. Better question yet, have you used this camera extensively?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gotta call you out on this one, if you&#8217;re going to write a review, write your own instead of paraphrasing what Nikon says about their cameras. You should be comparing this camera to other cameras and giving reasons why this is better or worse. Save your time and just put a link to Nikon&#8217;s website. Better question yet, have you used this camera extensively?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aredent Photog</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/nikon-coolpix-l100/comment-page-1#comment-62612</link>
		<dc:creator>Aredent Photog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 19:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=3604#comment-62612</guid>
		<description>I have this and I like it. i bougt for performance and affordability and I wanted to upgrade. I wish I could have afforded a Cannon with interchangeable lens options. But until I can sell some &#039;money shots&#039;, I will stick to this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have this and I like it. i bougt for performance and affordability and I wanted to upgrade. I wish I could have afforded a Cannon with interchangeable lens options. But until I can sell some &#8216;money shots&#8217;, I will stick to this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/nikon-coolpix-l100/comment-page-1#comment-61586</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=3604#comment-61586</guid>
		<description>I purchased one of these cameras and I am pleased with it so far.  The camera performs like a high end point and shoot (with a CCD sensor instead of a CMOS sensor as found in DSLRs) with a few tricks up its sleeve.  I use it primarily to photograph my 4 month old baby boy and find that it is sometimes easier to get a good candid shot of him from across the room (so he is not distracted by the camera).  The 15x optical zoom allows me to take photos of him from about 10-15 feet and with the image stabilization (feels like a gyroscope when it is in use), I can get Macro focus shots without a flash from that distance!

Nikon recently updated the firmware of the camera to support NiMH rechargeable batteries (will take about 600 shots this way vs. 350 with alkaline and 900 with lithium disposable batteries - http://support.nikontech.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/16481/sort/4,2/r_id/116678 ) and I am using the camera with Sanyo eneloop &quot;pre-charged&quot; NiMH rechargeable AA batteries (about $12 USD for a 4 pack).  So far, so good!

Don&#039;t get me wrong, this camera is blown away by cameras with a CMOS sensor in image quality (as most DSLRs benefit from the higher quality sensor and store uncompressed images as well) and in low light but this camera takes excellent snap shots when there is adequate lighting.  I need to experiment with dusk mode to get low light shots (as you can&#039;t manually adjust your ISO settings or shutter speed) but will need to mount the camera on my tripod to do so (as the shutter speed is a little too low even for the image stabilization to be effective) and I&#039;d love to try some photos of the moon that way with the mega zoom!

All in all, I am happy with my purchase of a camera that my wife is very comfortable using (whereas a DSLR intimidated her).  She had a Nikon Coolpix L11 before this camera and the controls are nearly identical in both so there is no learning curve from Nikon&#039;s inexpensive point and shoots to this one.  We paid $220 USD for this camera and are, thus far, happy with our purchase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I purchased one of these cameras and I am pleased with it so far.  The camera performs like a high end point and shoot (with a CCD sensor instead of a CMOS sensor as found in DSLRs) with a few tricks up its sleeve.  I use it primarily to photograph my 4 month old baby boy and find that it is sometimes easier to get a good candid shot of him from across the room (so he is not distracted by the camera).  The 15x optical zoom allows me to take photos of him from about 10-15 feet and with the image stabilization (feels like a gyroscope when it is in use), I can get Macro focus shots without a flash from that distance!</p>
<p>Nikon recently updated the firmware of the camera to support NiMH rechargeable batteries (will take about 600 shots this way vs. 350 with alkaline and 900 with lithium disposable batteries &#8211; <a href="http://support.nikontech.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/16481/sort/4,2/r_id/116678" rel="nofollow">http://support.nikontech.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/16481/sort/4,2/r_id/116678</a> ) and I am using the camera with Sanyo eneloop &#8220;pre-charged&#8221; NiMH rechargeable AA batteries (about $12 USD for a 4 pack).  So far, so good!</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, this camera is blown away by cameras with a CMOS sensor in image quality (as most DSLRs benefit from the higher quality sensor and store uncompressed images as well) and in low light but this camera takes excellent snap shots when there is adequate lighting.  I need to experiment with dusk mode to get low light shots (as you can&#8217;t manually adjust your ISO settings or shutter speed) but will need to mount the camera on my tripod to do so (as the shutter speed is a little too low even for the image stabilization to be effective) and I&#8217;d love to try some photos of the moon that way with the mega zoom!</p>
<p>All in all, I am happy with my purchase of a camera that my wife is very comfortable using (whereas a DSLR intimidated her).  She had a Nikon Coolpix L11 before this camera and the controls are nearly identical in both so there is no learning curve from Nikon&#8217;s inexpensive point and shoots to this one.  We paid $220 USD for this camera and are, thus far, happy with our purchase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cherry John Cheriyan</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/nikon-coolpix-l100/comment-page-1#comment-48514</link>
		<dc:creator>Cherry John Cheriyan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=3604#comment-48514</guid>
		<description>I have purchased Nikon P80 which is a better option to L100 as the same is powered by a rechargeable Li-ion battery and have 18X zoom and will be within the budget</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have purchased Nikon P80 which is a better option to L100 as the same is powered by a rechargeable Li-ion battery and have 18X zoom and will be within the budget</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JChristian</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/nikon-coolpix-l100/comment-page-1#comment-44480</link>
		<dc:creator>JChristian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 15:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=3604#comment-44480</guid>
		<description>Mmm ... I am discouraged when I learned that I had to put four AAA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mmm &#8230; I am discouraged when I learned that I had to put four AAA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gerald sherman</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/nikon-coolpix-l100/comment-page-1#comment-42170</link>
		<dc:creator>gerald sherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 05:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=3604#comment-42170</guid>
		<description>This is the one for me. I&#039;ll be near the front of the ine when it comes out n April.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the one for me. I&#8217;ll be near the front of the ine when it comes out n April.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>