<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Learn to See Abstractly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digital-photography-school.com/learn-to-see-abstractly/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/learn-to-see-abstractly</link>
	<description>Discover how to use your digital camera with our Digital Photography Tips. We are a community of photographers of all experience levels who come together to learn, share and grow in our understanding of photography.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:37:20 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Solo</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/learn-to-see-abstractly/comment-page-1#comment-49840</link>
		<dc:creator>Solo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 19:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=5461#comment-49840</guid>
		<description>I am fairly new to photography though I do have a good working understanding of most visual media. Reading this tutorial and other articles in the popular photography press is leaving me a little worried, as there seems to be a lot of talk about &#039;creativity&#039;, &#039;art(y)&#039;, &#039;response&#039; etc without much in the way of informed or instructional visual communication.

I am sorry guys but shooting without purpose and deciding &#039;what it means&#039; after, is very very easy, notwithstanding that these and other images I see often demonstrate advanced technical ability. But is that enough? 

Are photography communities happy to be technicians who need to explain the meaning in their work, if there actually is any? Even something as recognisable as a portrait can be planned to lever known principles relating to composition, presentational codes, even lighting, and yes there are rules and conventions that can be learned and then applied in highly creative ways. Beyond a hunch or a gut feeling.

What if the portrait of a high powered politician or business man needs to show vulnerability, or confidence in the portrait of a fragile octogenarian? How do we tap into the decoding mechanisms of our audience, plan to elicit a calculated response that might be offered without the need for an explanation?

I am not trying to offend here, but I am struggling to find informed approaches to meaning beyond great technical execution. Help me out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am fairly new to photography though I do have a good working understanding of most visual media. Reading this tutorial and other articles in the popular photography press is leaving me a little worried, as there seems to be a lot of talk about &#8216;creativity&#8217;, &#8216;art(y)&#8217;, &#8216;response&#8217; etc without much in the way of informed or instructional visual communication.</p>
<p>I am sorry guys but shooting without purpose and deciding &#8216;what it means&#8217; after, is very very easy, notwithstanding that these and other images I see often demonstrate advanced technical ability. But is that enough? </p>
<p>Are photography communities happy to be technicians who need to explain the meaning in their work, if there actually is any? Even something as recognisable as a portrait can be planned to lever known principles relating to composition, presentational codes, even lighting, and yes there are rules and conventions that can be learned and then applied in highly creative ways. Beyond a hunch or a gut feeling.</p>
<p>What if the portrait of a high powered politician or business man needs to show vulnerability, or confidence in the portrait of a fragile octogenarian? How do we tap into the decoding mechanisms of our audience, plan to elicit a calculated response that might be offered without the need for an explanation?</p>
<p>I am not trying to offend here, but I am struggling to find informed approaches to meaning beyond great technical execution. Help me out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chelsey</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/learn-to-see-abstractly/comment-page-1#comment-49597</link>
		<dc:creator>Chelsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=5461#comment-49597</guid>
		<description>This is one of those things I could definitely work on... I seem to get stuck in a rut of shooting from the same angles or perspectives!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of those things I could definitely work on&#8230; I seem to get stuck in a rut of shooting from the same angles or perspectives!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bim</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/learn-to-see-abstractly/comment-page-1#comment-49452</link>
		<dc:creator>Bim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=5461#comment-49452</guid>
		<description>Good article. I always take my photos abstractly. Lining up things and looking at the contrast between different buildings and objects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article. I always take my photos abstractly. Lining up things and looking at the contrast between different buildings and objects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dory</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/learn-to-see-abstractly/comment-page-1#comment-49336</link>
		<dc:creator>Dory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 07:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=5461#comment-49336</guid>
		<description>Well, I must be doing something right... I have one from the Arch very similar to the one you have here! I took &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/42wallabyway/3410896785/in/set-72157616336925358/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; 11/07. 

Great article! I need to be looking for more abstract shot opportunities!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I must be doing something right&#8230; I have one from the Arch very similar to the one you have here! I took <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/42wallabyway/3410896785/in/set-72157616336925358/" rel="nofollow">this</a> 11/07. </p>
<p>Great article! I need to be looking for more abstract shot opportunities!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: photo retouching</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/learn-to-see-abstractly/comment-page-1#comment-49235</link>
		<dc:creator>photo retouching</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 12:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=5461#comment-49235</guid>
		<description>I recommend your tutorials to a lot of beginner photographers as it is really clear and easy to follow. Once they master thier compositions, they never look back.Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recommend your tutorials to a lot of beginner photographers as it is really clear and easy to follow. Once they master thier compositions, they never look back.Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dulcie Andres</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/learn-to-see-abstractly/comment-page-1#comment-49219</link>
		<dc:creator>Dulcie Andres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 08:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=5461#comment-49219</guid>
		<description>This tutorial on abstraction was clear, informative, and interesting.  And your photos clearly illustrated your point.  Thanks for the information.  Well done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This tutorial on abstraction was clear, informative, and interesting.  And your photos clearly illustrated your point.  Thanks for the information.  Well done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ilan</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/learn-to-see-abstractly/comment-page-1#comment-49147</link>
		<dc:creator>Ilan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=5461#comment-49147</guid>
		<description>Too many link on my previous comment apparently, so It&#039;s awaiting moderation. My bad :S I&#039;ll leave only one.

When I started taking photos, the first thing for me was architectural abstracts.
I found an easy technique - My only guideline was to always try and &lt;b&gt; remember that photos are 2D&lt;/b&gt; so I pictured my surrounding in the same way.
After learning to “alter” my vision according to desired result, I tried to implement the same rules on different things, like nature for example. It worked :)

Here is &lt;b&gt;New York in semi-abstract&lt;/b&gt; - http://www.ilanbresler.com/2008/07/simcity.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too many link on my previous comment apparently, so It&#8217;s awaiting moderation. My bad :S I&#8217;ll leave only one.</p>
<p>When I started taking photos, the first thing for me was architectural abstracts.<br />
I found an easy technique &#8211; My only guideline was to always try and <b> remember that photos are 2D</b> so I pictured my surrounding in the same way.<br />
After learning to “alter” my vision according to desired result, I tried to implement the same rules on different things, like nature for example. It worked :)</p>
<p>Here is <b>New York in semi-abstract</b> &#8211; <a href="http://www.ilanbresler.com/2008/07/simcity.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ilanbresler.com/2008/07/simcity.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guillaume Lemoine</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/learn-to-see-abstractly/comment-page-1#comment-49145</link>
		<dc:creator>Guillaume Lemoine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=5461#comment-49145</guid>
		<description>Thank you for putting this so well into perspective.

For some reason I also appear to have this &quot;into the corner&quot; taste for composition.

I also find that breaking the horizon, shooting into diagonal by trying to have another line that the horizon aligned with a border of the frame (a perspective from the side of a building for instance) gives more dynamism to the result.

Like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/guillaumelemoine/sets/72157606627977635/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;in this album&lt;/a&gt; for instance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for putting this so well into perspective.</p>
<p>For some reason I also appear to have this &#8220;into the corner&#8221; taste for composition.</p>
<p>I also find that breaking the horizon, shooting into diagonal by trying to have another line that the horizon aligned with a border of the frame (a perspective from the side of a building for instance) gives more dynamism to the result.</p>
<p>Like <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/guillaumelemoine/sets/72157606627977635/" rel="nofollow">in this album</a> for instance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ilan</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/learn-to-see-abstractly/comment-page-1#comment-49144</link>
		<dc:creator>Ilan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=5461#comment-49144</guid>
		<description>When I started taking photos, the first thing for me was architectural abstracts. 
It was easy for - My only guideline was to always try and &lt;b&gt;remember that photos are 2D&lt;/b&gt; so I pictured my surrounding in the same way. 
After learning to &quot;alter&quot; my vision according to desired result, I tried to implement the same rules on different things, like nature for example. It worked :)

Here is &lt;b&gt;New York in semi-abstract&lt;/b&gt; http://www.ilanbresler.com/2008/07/simcity.html

And here is nature shot - http://www.ilanbresler.com/2009/02/fractures.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I started taking photos, the first thing for me was architectural abstracts.<br />
It was easy for &#8211; My only guideline was to always try and <b>remember that photos are 2D</b> so I pictured my surrounding in the same way.<br />
After learning to &#8220;alter&#8221; my vision according to desired result, I tried to implement the same rules on different things, like nature for example. It worked :)</p>
<p>Here is <b>New York in semi-abstract</b> <a href="http://www.ilanbresler.com/2008/07/simcity.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ilanbresler.com/2008/07/simcity.html</a></p>
<p>And here is nature shot &#8211; <a href="http://www.ilanbresler.com/2009/02/fractures.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ilanbresler.com/2009/02/fractures.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Kozlowski</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/learn-to-see-abstractly/comment-page-1#comment-49135</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Kozlowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 14:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=5461#comment-49135</guid>
		<description>I believe that once a new photographer truly learns how to &#039;see&#039; his subject as Andrew explains in this post, there is no holding them back.  Once you &#039;get it&#039;, there is no turning back.  After learning how to compose well, it&#039;s difficult not to compose well if that makes any sense.

Andrew, I try to make objects lead off into the corner of the shots also...somehow it just completes the shot, and makes it &#039;feel&#039; right.  Great post!

Here is &lt;a href=&quot;http://dallasphotoworks.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a link&lt;/a&gt; to some of my abstract-style images taken recently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that once a new photographer truly learns how to &#8217;see&#8217; his subject as Andrew explains in this post, there is no holding them back.  Once you &#8216;get it&#8217;, there is no turning back.  After learning how to compose well, it&#8217;s difficult not to compose well if that makes any sense.</p>
<p>Andrew, I try to make objects lead off into the corner of the shots also&#8230;somehow it just completes the shot, and makes it &#8216;feel&#8217; right.  Great post!</p>
<p>Here is <a href="http://dallasphotoworks.com" rel="nofollow">a link</a> to some of my abstract-style images taken recently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
