<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Photograph an Image on a TV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digital-photography-school.com/how-to-photograph-an-image-on-a-tv/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/how-to-photograph-an-image-on-a-tv</link>
	<description>Discover how to use your digital camera with our Digital Photography Tips. We are a community of photographers of all experience levels who come together to learn, share and grow in our understanding of photography.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:52:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: B.</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/how-to-photograph-an-image-on-a-tv/comment-page-1#comment-43347</link>
		<dc:creator>B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/how-to-photograph-an-image-on-a-tv/#comment-43347</guid>
		<description>If you leave the flash off when taking a picture there won&#039;t be any lines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you leave the flash off when taking a picture there won&#8217;t be any lines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick M</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/how-to-photograph-an-image-on-a-tv/comment-page-1#comment-37806</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 23:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/how-to-photograph-an-image-on-a-tv/#comment-37806</guid>
		<description>If you must use a digital camera to capture an image from a movie (DVD), you will need to turn the camera on a 45 degree angle to eliminate &quot;banding&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you must use a digital camera to capture an image from a movie (DVD), you will need to turn the camera on a 45 degree angle to eliminate &#8220;banding&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave B</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/how-to-photograph-an-image-on-a-tv/comment-page-1#comment-10042</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 16:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/how-to-photograph-an-image-on-a-tv/#comment-10042</guid>
		<description>Question,
  I was reading about copyright, that you can&#039;t copy the original works of something, like a photo.
  You need to add a new dimension to what was copyrighted in order for it to not be a violation.
  Now DVD&#039;s, burning a copy is a recreation of the original work so it&#039;s violation, but is taking a still snap shot off your TV from a DVD violating copyright?  The original works was a motion picture, not still snap shots.  Is doing this (creative enough) creating another work outside the original works of the copyright owner?  If it is considered a creative new work it is not a copyright violation.
This is why parody, like drawing a beard on a Madonna picture is not copyright violation, it added a new feature outside of the original.
  I have read another article on the net that one guy took hundreds of shots off his TV to be published in books and magazines.
  I have looked for info on this and I can&#039;t seen to find any legal information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question,<br />
  I was reading about copyright, that you can&#8217;t copy the original works of something, like a photo.<br />
  You need to add a new dimension to what was copyrighted in order for it to not be a violation.<br />
  Now DVD&#8217;s, burning a copy is a recreation of the original work so it&#8217;s violation, but is taking a still snap shot off your TV from a DVD violating copyright?  The original works was a motion picture, not still snap shots.  Is doing this (creative enough) creating another work outside the original works of the copyright owner?  If it is considered a creative new work it is not a copyright violation.<br />
This is why parody, like drawing a beard on a Madonna picture is not copyright violation, it added a new feature outside of the original.<br />
  I have read another article on the net that one guy took hundreds of shots off his TV to be published in books and magazines.<br />
  I have looked for info on this and I can&#8217;t seen to find any legal information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JuliÃ¡n Rodriguez Orihuela</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/how-to-photograph-an-image-on-a-tv/comment-page-1#comment-9692</link>
		<dc:creator>JuliÃ¡n Rodriguez Orihuela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 03:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/how-to-photograph-an-image-on-a-tv/#comment-9692</guid>
		<description>And many times you&#039;ll want that pixellated effect in a shot, it can look really cool.

e.g.: http://flickr.com/photos/ceralin/309215223/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And many times you&#8217;ll want that pixellated effect in a shot, it can look really cool.</p>
<p>e.g.: <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/ceralin/309215223/" rel="nofollow">http://flickr.com/photos/ceralin/309215223/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/how-to-photograph-an-image-on-a-tv/comment-page-1#comment-9684</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 22:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/how-to-photograph-an-image-on-a-tv/#comment-9684</guid>
		<description>you&#039;re right Andrew and Tim - much better results with those approaches if you&#039;ve got the resources to do so. 

Unfortunately the reader who asked the question just had a TV and a camera to capture the shot so actually photographing the TV was his only option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you&#8217;re right Andrew and Tim &#8211; much better results with those approaches if you&#8217;ve got the resources to do so. </p>
<p>Unfortunately the reader who asked the question just had a TV and a camera to capture the shot so actually photographing the TV was his only option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Puplet</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/how-to-photograph-an-image-on-a-tv/comment-page-1#comment-9682</link>
		<dc:creator>Puplet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 22:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/how-to-photograph-an-image-on-a-tv/#comment-9682</guid>
		<description>Ditto...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Ferguson</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/how-to-photograph-an-image-on-a-tv/comment-page-1#comment-9679</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Ferguson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 22:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/how-to-photograph-an-image-on-a-tv/#comment-9679</guid>
		<description>If you want to capture something from a television, it&#039;s *much* better to use a tv capture card for your computer. I&#039;d recommend doing that ten times out of ten vs taking a photo of  something on tv.

If there&#039;s just a tv in the background and you dont want a band, these are great tips.

The refresh rate/frequency of electronics is important, particularly with TV&#039;s, monitors, and flourescent lights. Flourescent tubes run at 60 hz, so in order to get a uniform distribution of light you need to shoot at 1/60th of a second to get a full wave or 1/30th to get two full waves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to capture something from a television, it&#8217;s *much* better to use a tv capture card for your computer. I&#8217;d recommend doing that ten times out of ten vs taking a photo of  something on tv.</p>
<p>If there&#8217;s just a tv in the background and you dont want a band, these are great tips.</p>
<p>The refresh rate/frequency of electronics is important, particularly with TV&#8217;s, monitors, and flourescent lights. Flourescent tubes run at 60 hz, so in order to get a uniform distribution of light you need to shoot at 1/60th of a second to get a full wave or 1/30th to get two full waves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/how-to-photograph-an-image-on-a-tv/comment-page-1#comment-9661</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 15:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/how-to-photograph-an-image-on-a-tv/#comment-9661</guid>
		<description>Some newer computer also have &quot;video-in&quot; ports that allow connection from a video source (DVD, VCR, TV, etc.). With the right software, you can take a screen shot of the video source just like you would take one of your computer&#039;s desktop.

It will create a perfect digital picture of the screen - perfectly sharp with the correct colors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some newer computer also have &#8220;video-in&#8221; ports that allow connection from a video source (DVD, VCR, TV, etc.). With the right software, you can take a screen shot of the video source just like you would take one of your computer&#8217;s desktop.</p>
<p>It will create a perfect digital picture of the screen &#8211; perfectly sharp with the correct colors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
