<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Overcome the Problem of Converging Verticals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digital-photography-school.com/how-to-overcome-the-problem-of-converging-verticals/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/how-to-overcome-the-problem-of-converging-verticals</link>
	<description>Discover how to use your digital camera with our Digital Photography Tips. We are a community of photographers of all experience levels who come together to learn, share and grow in our understanding of photography.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:37:20 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/how-to-overcome-the-problem-of-converging-verticals/comment-page-1#comment-17101</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 17:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/how-to-overcome-the-problem-of-converging-verticals/#comment-17101</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see it as a problem, while I can&#039;t say I like the first picture that much - mainly because its subject matter is hardly interesting - the second one looks flat and boring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see it as a problem, while I can&#8217;t say I like the first picture that much &#8211; mainly because its subject matter is hardly interesting &#8211; the second one looks flat and boring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wade</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/how-to-overcome-the-problem-of-converging-verticals/comment-page-1#comment-14785</link>
		<dc:creator>wade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 04:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/how-to-overcome-the-problem-of-converging-verticals/#comment-14785</guid>
		<description>there is a program called photo stich. it allows you to take two photos and merge them together. most people use it for panning scenery, that way you can get all the scene into one picture with the computer. 

instead of getting close and using a sharp angle to fit it all in, back up, take the picture. load them into photostitch, and them merge them together.
it&#039;s complicated, but it works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there is a program called photo stich. it allows you to take two photos and merge them together. most people use it for panning scenery, that way you can get all the scene into one picture with the computer. </p>
<p>instead of getting close and using a sharp angle to fit it all in, back up, take the picture. load them into photostitch, and them merge them together.<br />
it&#8217;s complicated, but it works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/how-to-overcome-the-problem-of-converging-verticals/comment-page-1#comment-12962</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 11:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/how-to-overcome-the-problem-of-converging-verticals/#comment-12962</guid>
		<description>This is a handy tip as I am currently trying to edit my photos taken of Venice. Majority of my photos have this problem... I should of shot more parallel and then cropped. I can now have a go at correcting in photoshop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a handy tip as I am currently trying to edit my photos taken of Venice. Majority of my photos have this problem&#8230; I should of shot more parallel and then cropped. I can now have a go at correcting in photoshop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhotoBump</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/how-to-overcome-the-problem-of-converging-verticals/comment-page-1#comment-12732</link>
		<dc:creator>PhotoBump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 22:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/how-to-overcome-the-problem-of-converging-verticals/#comment-12732</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the tips ;) I always had this problem.

http://www.photobump.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tips ;) I always had this problem.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.photobump.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.photobump.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/how-to-overcome-the-problem-of-converging-verticals/comment-page-1#comment-12727</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 21:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/how-to-overcome-the-problem-of-converging-verticals/#comment-12727</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m all about tip #1!  Sometimes (as ahref=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/edgeofcenter/450070934/&quot;&gt;here I&#039;ll also align the long axis of the shot along one line that is not a perfect horizontal or vertical, to emphasize convergences and odd angles even more. 

We forget when we look at pictures that the human eye does a lot of auto-correction for convergences - we don&#039;t notice them when looking at a scene with a lot of straight lines unless we stop to look for them, but we do pick out interesting angles, tilt our heads, scan from side to side to take in a whole view, and often not even realize we&#039;re doing it.  It&#039;s more fun, easier (for me at least) and, I think, more honest, to compose a picture that plays on the ways we actually look at things than to make it look the way we expect it to.  

That&#039;s not to say that the other tips aren&#039;t valid - the second picture is a nice, even composition, and for a lot of purposes it&#039;s the only really appropriate treatment, but it wouldn&#039;t fit into my body of work in any way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m all about tip #1!  Sometimes (as ahref=&#8221;http://www.flickr.com/photos/edgeofcenter/450070934/&#8221;&gt;here I&#8217;ll also align the long axis of the shot along one line that is not a perfect horizontal or vertical, to emphasize convergences and odd angles even more. </p>
<p>We forget when we look at pictures that the human eye does a lot of auto-correction for convergences &#8211; we don&#8217;t notice them when looking at a scene with a lot of straight lines unless we stop to look for them, but we do pick out interesting angles, tilt our heads, scan from side to side to take in a whole view, and often not even realize we&#8217;re doing it.  It&#8217;s more fun, easier (for me at least) and, I think, more honest, to compose a picture that plays on the ways we actually look at things than to make it look the way we expect it to.  </p>
<p>That&#8217;s not to say that the other tips aren&#8217;t valid &#8211; the second picture is a nice, even composition, and for a lot of purposes it&#8217;s the only really appropriate treatment, but it wouldn&#8217;t fit into my body of work in any way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Pozadzides</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/how-to-overcome-the-problem-of-converging-verticals/comment-page-1#comment-12706</link>
		<dc:creator>John Pozadzides</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 15:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/how-to-overcome-the-problem-of-converging-verticals/#comment-12706</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry to report, but I was disappointed with this article.  

This article for me did not live up to the title.  I was hoping for some actual detail, but it was so general that I learned nothing from it, and I don&#039;t feel like I&#039;ve got any additional information to advance my skills further.

As a few examples:
 - When you say &quot;enhance it&quot; why not give us some idea of what you mean?  Show me a &quot;control&quot; photo and then show me an &quot;enhanced&quot; photo.  

 - Same thing with &quot;minimize it&quot;.  Show me multiple photos of a subject from the angles you are talking about so I can actually see what you mean.

 - When you say &quot;correct it&quot;, why not at least pick one program and give some specific details about where the option is found and perhaps a before and after photo?

 - Finally, why would you recommend changing lenses without giving a couple examples of lenses that do what you are talking about?  How about a link or something?  I don&#039;t have the slightest idea what lenses you are talking about, how they work, or where to find them.

Generally speaking, I&#039;m a fan of the site, a regular subscriber and reader, and I&#039;ve even blogged about it.  But articles like this just lack the kind of detail that I think we need to see, and therefore just leave me frustrated.

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry to report, but I was disappointed with this article.  </p>
<p>This article for me did not live up to the title.  I was hoping for some actual detail, but it was so general that I learned nothing from it, and I don&#8217;t feel like I&#8217;ve got any additional information to advance my skills further.</p>
<p>As a few examples:<br />
 &#8211; When you say &#8220;enhance it&#8221; why not give us some idea of what you mean?  Show me a &#8220;control&#8221; photo and then show me an &#8220;enhanced&#8221; photo.  </p>
<p> &#8211; Same thing with &#8220;minimize it&#8221;.  Show me multiple photos of a subject from the angles you are talking about so I can actually see what you mean.</p>
<p> &#8211; When you say &#8220;correct it&#8221;, why not at least pick one program and give some specific details about where the option is found and perhaps a before and after photo?</p>
<p> &#8211; Finally, why would you recommend changing lenses without giving a couple examples of lenses that do what you are talking about?  How about a link or something?  I don&#8217;t have the slightest idea what lenses you are talking about, how they work, or where to find them.</p>
<p>Generally speaking, I&#8217;m a fan of the site, a regular subscriber and reader, and I&#8217;ve even blogged about it.  But articles like this just lack the kind of detail that I think we need to see, and therefore just leave me frustrated.</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/how-to-overcome-the-problem-of-converging-verticals/comment-page-1#comment-12689</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 14:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/how-to-overcome-the-problem-of-converging-verticals/#comment-12689</guid>
		<description>Thanks Jerry, the ShiftN tool is really great!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jerry, the ShiftN tool is really great!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reggie</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/how-to-overcome-the-problem-of-converging-verticals/comment-page-1#comment-12679</link>
		<dc:creator>Reggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/how-to-overcome-the-problem-of-converging-verticals/#comment-12679</guid>
		<description>I use &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.epaperpress.com/ptlens/&quot; title=&quot;PTLens lens distortion, chromatic aberration, perspective and vignetting correction program and PhotoShop Plug-in&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;PTLens&lt;/a&gt; for correcting perspective and lens distortion simultaneously. It is available as a stand-alone program or a plug-in to PhotoShop and PaintShopPro. I believe it is also included as part of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://macbibble.com/products/bibble/bibble4.html&quot; title=&quot;Bibble raw convertor&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bibble raw convertor&lt;/a&gt;. 

PTLens allows you to place a grid over your photo and adjust vertical perspective, horizontal perspective and the rotation of the image. 

Note also that the vertical in the centre of an image should be vertical on the photo - this is a useful tip for getting the horizon level. 

One photographer who often corrects for perspective is &lt;a href=&quot;http://wvs.topleftpixel.com/&quot; title=&quot;daily dose of imagery photos&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Sam Javanrouh at daily dose of imagery&lt;/a&gt;. One of his techniques is to take multiple photos and stitch them together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use <a href="http://www.epaperpress.com/ptlens/" title="PTLens lens distortion, chromatic aberration, perspective and vignetting correction program and PhotoShop Plug-in" rel="nofollow">PTLens</a> for correcting perspective and lens distortion simultaneously. It is available as a stand-alone program or a plug-in to PhotoShop and PaintShopPro. I believe it is also included as part of the <a href="http://macbibble.com/products/bibble/bibble4.html" title="Bibble raw convertor" rel="nofollow">Bibble raw convertor</a>. </p>
<p>PTLens allows you to place a grid over your photo and adjust vertical perspective, horizontal perspective and the rotation of the image. </p>
<p>Note also that the vertical in the centre of an image should be vertical on the photo &#8211; this is a useful tip for getting the horizon level. </p>
<p>One photographer who often corrects for perspective is <a href="http://wvs.topleftpixel.com/" title="daily dose of imagery photos" rel="nofollow">Sam Javanrouh at daily dose of imagery</a>. One of his techniques is to take multiple photos and stitch them together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/how-to-overcome-the-problem-of-converging-verticals/comment-page-1#comment-12657</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 07:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/how-to-overcome-the-problem-of-converging-verticals/#comment-12657</guid>
		<description>I know this might be anathema on a digital phtography site, but a second hand large format camera and lens (which easily overcomes the perspective distortion issue) is cheaper than a tilt-shift / perspective control lens for a modern SLR. Of course, it&#039;s also far less portable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this might be anathema on a digital phtography site, but a second hand large format camera and lens (which easily overcomes the perspective distortion issue) is cheaper than a tilt-shift / perspective control lens for a modern SLR. Of course, it&#8217;s also far less portable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lia</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/how-to-overcome-the-problem-of-converging-verticals/comment-page-1#comment-12654</link>
		<dc:creator>Lia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 05:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/how-to-overcome-the-problem-of-converging-verticals/#comment-12654</guid>
		<description>I use the transform -&gt; skew tool in Photoshop (got the tip from a flickr-buddy :)) and it is working great for even a bloody beginner like me :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use the transform -&gt; skew tool in Photoshop (got the tip from a flickr-buddy :)) and it is working great for even a bloody beginner like me :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
