Go Back   Digital Photography School - Photography Forums > Digital Photography Techniques > Tutorials


View Poll Results: What do you prefer?
"Normal" article-style? 23 67.65%
Video-tutorials 15 44.12%
Power-point presentation style? 6 17.65%
Many shots taken off flickr 9 26.47%
Less shots, but have them commented 12 35.29%
Other 0 0%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 34. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-07-2008, 01:56 AM
MrCastle's Avatar
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Quebec city, Canada
Posts: 259
Default Tutorial format?

Just wondering what people prefer in terms of tutorial format.
By format I mean the way in which it is presented, how it is delivered to the reader/viewer.

You CAN vote for MULTIPLE ANSWERS in the poll.

Normal, article-style tutorials like what is found on the DPS blog most of the time?
Video tutorials, as found on youtube, google video or other like web sites?
Power point style presentation tutorials (slide by slide) viewable in the browser, without having to download anything?

With as many examples as possible (lot's and lot's of photographs)?
Do you prefer lot's of photos taken off of flickr or less photos, but commented as to why they work and how it was done?

Why am I wondering this?
Because, if I write a tutorial, I want people to like it!
__________________
Canon EOS Digital Rebel XTi/400D with kit lens
Go ahead, critique me! It'll help me more than if you just look at my photo!

Last edited by MrCastle; 11-07-2008 at 02:00 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-07-2008, 02:10 AM
Nathan deGargoyle's Avatar
dPS +1000 Club
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chesterfield, UK
Posts: 2,106
Default

I don't like video tuts. If I can't follow a text tut I stasnd no chance with a video.
__________________
"A wise man speaks because he has something to say, a fool speaks because he has to say something." -aristotle.
Nikon D70s, 18-55 kit lens, 55-200 VR, 28mm f/2.8, 50mm f/1.8
creativecommons.org - Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike
My "Best shots" on Flickr
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-07-2008, 02:18 AM
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 604
Default

Re: video - I ignore most of these tuts on the net as they take too long to watch, and you can't skim them and find the good stuff, and neither are they searchable (e.g. text can be found via Google)

Re: powerpoint - the bane of information transfer. Nuff said!
__________________
blog | flickr | Canon 5DII, 7D
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-07-2008, 05:55 AM
LightChaser's Avatar
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 79
Default

An article works best.

Photos, examples, illustrations, and other visual aids are not a requirement, but usually help a lot.

Unless the tutorial is really long, keeping it all in one page is very much appreciated.

DPS & Strobist are good examples of tutorial sites.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-07-2008, 08:53 AM
wulf's Avatar
Ninja Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 9,834
Default

The exact presentation depends on the aim of the tutorial. If it seeks to inspire, then lots of excellent pictures are good; if it seeks to educate, it might be better to start with one picture and then explore how it was created (additional shots of the set up and any stages of post-processing would be good supplements).

I don't like standalone video or powerpoint type tutorials. They demand time to watch and then, if they turned out to be any good, it is hard to follow them. A page of information is much easier - you can skim ahead and then return to concentrate on the details. I think the best place for those media is to supplement one of the other formats - for example, "here is a slideshow of ten pictures taken with this type of lens", "here is a video which shows me setting up and taking the shot" or "here is a screencast of the simple postprocessing steps outlined, so you can see just quick and easy it is".

Wulf
__________________
Wulf Forrester-Barker << Sites: blog / flickr >>
Gear: Nikon D40, Nikon AFS 18-55mm f/3.5 - 5.6G, Nikon Series E 50mm f/1.8, Nikon AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6G, Vivitar 90mm f/2.5 macro, Raynox DCR-250, Lensbaby 2.0k, SB600
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-07-2008, 05:22 PM
lputman's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Olive Branch, MS
Posts: 7,325
Default

I agree with 100% Wulf.

I would like to be able to print the tutorial as often times websites be extinct and bookmarked tuts are no longer. I actually like the ones where there is already a pdf file for downloading and if not, then at least the ability to create my own pdf of it.
__________________
Lori Putman flickr
~No one can drive us crazy unless we give them the keys
~~Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass, it's about learning to dance in the rain!
7D | 300L f/4 IS | 135L | 35L | 100/2.0 | 50/1.4
430 EX, 580 EX II Speedlites
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 11-10-2008, 01:17 PM
MrCastle's Avatar
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Quebec city, Canada
Posts: 259
Default

Well, it seems the most popular is by far the "normal" article style tutorial.

As for shots, I might just have to but up some commented ones and a few particularly good ones with a bunch of comments!

Thanks for the input!
__________________
Canon EOS Digital Rebel XTi/400D with kit lens
Go ahead, critique me! It'll help me more than if you just look at my photo!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 11-14-2008, 07:40 AM
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Kellevie. Tasmania
Posts: 21
Default

I voted for normal article style, i find them easier to follow, easier to copy/paste should i want to print the article too .

I must admit i won't even view a video tut.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 11-14-2008, 07:54 AM
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Anglia, England
Posts: 368
Default

A combination. I'm more likely to scan through a normal tutorial regardless of the subject, but I'm only likely to watch a tutorial if it's something I'm particularly interested in or really complicated.
__________________
Please comment on my pics either here or on flickr - honest feedback is the best way to learn. You can edit my pics to post back on DPS if required.
Started photography October 2007.
~ Canon 5d (on it's way!), Canon 400d, kit lens, 50mm f/1.4 lens, 70-200mm f/4 L IS lens, 60mm f/2.8 Macro USM lens, tripod, 580 EX II speedlight, EX150 home studio lights. PSE5 ~

Last edited by Scatterbrain; 11-14-2008 at 07:56 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0