|
|||
|
Hi,
So, as we know some lenses are sharper than others etc... but sharpening can be done in post also, either for example in Lightroom or in PS or in any other software used. I am at a loss on how much to sharpen. Of course it depends on what you want the final result to be but I am just interested how much does the community here sharpen in post and which sharpening tool they use ![]() Cheers!
__________________
My Flickr page Flickr Photostream RSS feed Gear: Nikon D80, 18-105mm DX VR f/3-5.6, Nikkor 50mm 1.8D AF, Nikon SB-700 |
|
|||
|
When it comes to sharpening, there are no easy answers. Here's the canonical book on the subject: www.amazon.com/World-Sharpening-Photoshop-Camera-Lightroom/dp/0321637550/ — it's 360 pages long.
The short answer is: there is no One Right Answer. It depends on your techniques, your tools, your vision for the image, and the output device(s). Furthermore, each photo must be approached differently. |
|
|||
|
I come from the three types of sharpening school; Capture sharpening, Creative sharpening, Output sharpening. How much to sharpen depends on alot of things - Raw or Jpg, Camera, Lenses, Your feelings, display size, and paper or monitor. There are whole books devoted to sharpening and sharpening tools.
capture sharpening is done in Raw conversion - or by your Jpg sharpening settings. This should be enough to undo the "softening" that occurs at the sensor level from the lens quality, bayer interpolation, and anti aliasing filter. Creative sharpening is sharpening parts of the image that you want to draw the eyes attention to. Output sharpening is based on the final display and is pretty tough to just define. If you're going for web or monitor display, just go with what you think looks good for now. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
------------- My advice is that if you see halos in high contrast areas after sharpening you've gone way too far (at least in those areas.. which brings us to a point that most often it's better to use selective sharpening). Example of the halo: http://www.pbase.com/lamlash/image/117490069/large.jpg
__________________
flickr | deviantArt | personal website Me: a photographer, a designer, a geek and awesome. Gear: Ohh a link? |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Lens sharp is NOT the same as software "sharpening". To be honest, software sharpening is not even sharpening. It is an increase in contrast along dissimilar edges in the image. So the process goes as such. If you take a out of focus image, you cannot sharpen it in post. You must make a tack sharp image and then in post you can refine the contrasting elements, such as the eyes to make them dominate the face. It will give the illusion of a very sharp image. There are programs out there such as deFine that do a passable job as long as the image is not more than a couple of pixels blurred. But they cannot make a silk purse out of a sow's ear. VSA, you are absolutely correct about the halo telling you that you have gone way too far. Much better to under sharpen than over sharpen. And always sharpen last after sizing for output. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
+1 I normally sharpen the image as I see fit before the whole resizing for web (for example), save, resize for web, sharpen just a little bit to compensate the slight degradation from resizing, save for web and close... keeping the original as it was. What comes to the tools, I mostly use Lightroom so there's not all that much choice but in Photoshop I most often use smart sharpen since it's quick and most times does the job. People from Adobe say that the Sharpen tool is the most sophisticated sharpening tool at the moment available in Photoshop, even though in the past (before cs5) it was frowned upon by almost everyone who knew what they were doing.
__________________
flickr | deviantArt | personal website Me: a photographer, a designer, a geek and awesome. Gear: Ohh a link? |
|
||||
|
Quote:
As for the rendering engine in the camera, you would have to know the software from the inside to know if they actually unsharpen the image during rendering from RAW to JPEG. As far as I know, Nikon nor any other manufacturer is forthcoming with that knowledge. It would certainly be pixel peeping but sometimes I get in the mood. Usually after my prints come out different than I thought they would!
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.
This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.
Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:
For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!
To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.
Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter: