#1 (permalink)  
Old 02-01-2012, 03:46 PM
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 305
Default Sharpening - how much?

Hi,

So, as we know some lenses are sharper than others etc... but sharpening can be done in post also, either for example in Lightroom or in PS or in any other software used.

I am at a loss on how much to sharpen. Of course it depends on what you want the final result to be but I am just interested how much does the community here sharpen in post and which sharpening tool they use

Cheers!
__________________
My Flickr page

Flickr Photostream RSS feed

Gear: Nikon D80, 18-105mm DX VR f/3-5.6, Nikkor 50mm 1.8D AF, Nikon SB-700
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-01-2012, 04:52 PM
Not photogenic
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 821
Default

When it comes to sharpening, there are no easy answers. Here's the canonical book on the subject: www.amazon.com/World-Sharpening-Photoshop-Camera-Lightroom/dp/0321637550/ — it's 360 pages long.

The short answer is: there is no One Right Answer. It depends on your techniques, your tools, your vision for the image, and the output device(s). Furthermore, each photo must be approached differently.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-07-2012, 03:24 PM
bigwater's Avatar
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 38
Default

It is also good to keep in mind what the image is going to be used for. If it is saved as a jpg some sharpening will be applied in that process but if it is saved as a tff or pdf for print more sharpening won't necessarily be applied.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-07-2012, 11:48 PM
Friendly Astrophysicist
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Japan
Posts: 1,127
Default

I come from the three types of sharpening school; Capture sharpening, Creative sharpening, Output sharpening. How much to sharpen depends on alot of things - Raw or Jpg, Camera, Lenses, Your feelings, display size, and paper or monitor. There are whole books devoted to sharpening and sharpening tools.

capture sharpening is done in Raw conversion - or by your Jpg sharpening settings. This should be enough to undo the "softening" that occurs at the sensor level from the lens quality, bayer interpolation, and anti aliasing filter.

Creative sharpening is sharpening parts of the image that you want to draw the eyes attention to.

Output sharpening is based on the final display and is pretty tough to just define. If you're going for web or monitor display, just go with what you think looks good for now.
__________________
My Gear and My Flickr
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-08-2012, 04:39 PM
vsa's Avatar
vsa vsa is offline
Mebmer
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Tampere, Finland
Posts: 500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigwater View Post
... If it is saved as a jpg some sharpening will be applied in that process ...
Would you explain this out for me? Never heard of sharpening if saving to jpg (assuming you're talking about software and not camera saving the image).

-------------

My advice is that if you see halos in high contrast areas after sharpening you've gone way too far (at least in those areas.. which brings us to a point that most often it's better to use selective sharpening).
Example of the halo: http://www.pbase.com/lamlash/image/117490069/large.jpg
__________________
flickr | deviantArt | personal website
Me: a photographer, a designer, a geek and awesome.
Gear: Ohh a link?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-09-2012, 01:51 AM
JFSanders's Avatar
Someone else guy
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: De Land Florida
Posts: 1,583
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vsa View Post
Would you explain this out for me? Never heard of sharpening if saving to jpg (assuming you're talking about software and not camera saving the image).

-------------

My advice is that if you see halos in high contrast areas after sharpening you've gone way too far (at least in those areas.. which brings us to a point that most often it's better to use selective sharpening).
Example of the halo: http://www.pbase.com/lamlash/image/117490069/large.jpg
The jpg standard is a algorithm applied and able to be read by other software. Yes, there is sharpening applied during the compression algorithm.

Lens sharp is NOT the same as software "sharpening". To be honest, software sharpening is not even sharpening. It is an increase in contrast along dissimilar edges in the image.

So the process goes as such. If you take a out of focus image, you cannot sharpen it in post. You must make a tack sharp image and then in post you can refine the contrasting elements, such as the eyes to make them dominate the face. It will give the illusion of a very sharp image.

There are programs out there such as deFine that do a passable job as long as the image is not more than a couple of pixels blurred. But they cannot make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.

VSA, you are absolutely correct about the halo telling you that you have gone way too far. Much better to under sharpen than over sharpen. And always sharpen last after sizing for output.
__________________
Nikon D40, D90, Fuji Finepix S5100, Mamiya RB67,

Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-09-2012, 04:54 PM
vsa's Avatar
vsa vsa is offline
Mebmer
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Tampere, Finland
Posts: 500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JFSanders View Post
...Yes, there is sharpening applied during the compression algorithm...
As far as I've seen there hasn't been any big change from photoshop to jpg so I'm assuming this sharpening is minimal and for the most part will go unnoticed and should not be factored in the overall shaprening process.. as in you shouldn't under sharpen just cos the jpg conversion will sharpen it a little.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JFSanders View Post
And always sharpen last after sizing for output.
+1

I normally sharpen the image as I see fit before the whole resizing for web (for example), save, resize for web, sharpen just a little bit to compensate the slight degradation from resizing, save for web and close... keeping the original as it was.

What comes to the tools, I mostly use Lightroom so there's not all that much choice but in Photoshop I most often use smart sharpen since it's quick and most times does the job. People from Adobe say that the Sharpen tool is the most sophisticated sharpening tool at the moment available in Photoshop, even though in the past (before cs5) it was frowned upon by almost everyone who knew what they were doing.
__________________
flickr | deviantArt | personal website
Me: a photographer, a designer, a geek and awesome.
Gear: Ohh a link?
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-09-2012, 06:04 PM
dakwegmo's Avatar
I shoot people
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,981
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vsa View Post
As far as I've seen there hasn't been any big change from photoshop to jpg so I'm assuming this sharpening is minimal and for the most part will go unnoticed and should not be factored in the overall shaprening process.. as in you shouldn't under sharpen just cos the jpg conversion will sharpen it a little.
JFSanders made it sound like JPG compression applies sharpening; it does not. If you're shooting JPGs, your camera automatically applies sharpening to compensate for inherent weaknesses in digital technology, but this is done before the image is compressed. Any other sharpening to the image would have to be done explicitly. Simply re-compressing the image won't add any additional sharpness.
__________________
[¯Ô¯] marcus
photoblog | Facebook | flickr | 5∞ px | G+
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-09-2012, 11:20 PM
JFSanders's Avatar
Someone else guy
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: De Land Florida
Posts: 1,583
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dakwegmo View Post
JFSanders made it sound like JPG compression applies sharpening; it does not. If you're shooting JPGs, your camera automatically applies sharpening to compensate for inherent weaknesses in digital technology, but this is done before the image is compressed. Any other sharpening to the image would have to be done explicitly. Simply re-compressing the image won't add any additional sharpness.
Marcus, in general terms you are correct that the compression algorithm does not specifically sharpen as it is defined by Adobe, but and it is a significant one, the algorithm effects the image in that it destroys pixels along contrasting edges which is what happens when you "unsharpen".

As for the rendering engine in the camera, you would have to know the software from the inside to know if they actually unsharpen the image during rendering from RAW to JPEG. As far as I know, Nikon nor any other manufacturer is forthcoming with that knowledge. It would certainly be pixel peeping but sometimes I get in the mood. Usually after my prints come out different than I thought they would!
__________________
Nikon D40, D90, Fuji Finepix S5100, Mamiya RB67,

Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-10-2012, 03:19 AM
dakwegmo's Avatar
I shoot people
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,981
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JFSanders View Post
Marcus, in general terms you are correct that the compression algorithm does not specifically sharpen as it is defined by Adobe, but and it is a significant one, the algorithm effects the image in that it destroys pixels along contrasting edges which is what happens when you "unsharpen".
The JPEG algorithm, which wasn't developed by Adobe, doesn't increase contrast; it takes a block of pixels and averages them. The result could be higher contrast if neighboring blocks of pixels are averaged in different directions, but for areas where there's already sharp contrast, the average often results in less contrast along the edge and an overall blurrier image.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JFSanders View Post
As for the rendering engine in the camera, you would have to know the software from the inside to know if they actually unsharpen the image during rendering from RAW to JPEG. As far as I know, Nikon nor any other manufacturer is forthcoming with that knowledge. It would certainly be pixel peeping but sometimes I get in the mood. Usually after my prints come out different than I thought they would!
Regardless of how it does it, the camera applies a separate sharpening algorithm to JPGs that is separate from the compression algorithm.
__________________
[¯Ô¯] marcus
photoblog | Facebook | flickr | 5∞ px | G+
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0