#1 (permalink)  
Old 04-14-2010, 04:25 PM
abarickman's Avatar
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chicago Burbs
Posts: 587
Default Developing consistancy to your look. How?

Hey all,

One thing I notice more and more about really good photographers is a level of consistency in their portfolio. I am not talking about images but in the way that they post process. I find that I am all over the place with my images. (Exhibit A my photostream -> Fluidr / AJBarickman's photos and videos) If you were to see them separately you would never guess that they were shot by the same person. I would like to develop a style for my PP, that I can vary from as needed, but is consistent.

I use Lightroom for 98% of my PP and I do edit each image to taste. I rarely use presets because I find that one or even a few rarely maximize the potential of a set of photos. I am sure that this methodology is why my images lack consistency.

Can anyone provide advice on how you have dealt with this issue?
__________________

AJ Barickman Fine Imagery
Photostream
Canon 40D | Canon 24mm-70mm F2.8L | Canon EF 70mm-200mm F4 L IS | Canon EF 50mm F1.4 | Canon 100mm F2.8 Macro |
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-14-2010, 04:46 PM
dakwegmo's Avatar
I shoot people
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,981
Default

A lot of it has to do with marketing/branding. Pro photographers are good at distinguishing themselves from the competition, so they'll show the work that sets them apart. Even if they have a variety of styles, or are willing to do whatever a client asks, they aren't going to advertise the work that makes them look like everyone else.

If you take all of your landscape photos, or your portraits, or whatever and start grouping them together you'll probably see that similar themed shots have more of a consistent look than you realize.
__________________
[¯Ô¯] marcus
photoblog | Facebook | flickr | 5∞ px | G+
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-14-2010, 04:50 PM
CiiVii's Avatar
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 193
Default

If you study some of the best photographers what you will see is not a gimmick, but someone who has been successful in conveying what they see through their eyes.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-14-2010, 09:45 PM
OsmosisStudios's Avatar
Don't Panic
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Mississauga / Ottawa
Posts: 11,361
Default

I dont have a particular style (I dont think, at least) but I will develop a particular shoot in a specific way to get an effect.
__________________
I am responsible for what I say; not what you understand.
OsmosisStudios
Gear List
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-14-2010, 10:48 PM
dPS +1000 Club
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,950
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by abarickman View Post
Hey all,

One thing I notice more and more about really good photographers is a level of consistency in their portfolio. I am not talking about images but in the way that they post process. I find that I am all over the place with my images. (Exhibit A my photostream -> Fluidr / AJBarickman's photos and videos) If you were to see them separately you would never guess that they were shot by the same person. I would like to develop a style for my PP, that I can vary from as needed, but is consistent.

I use Lightroom for 98% of my PP and I do edit each image to taste. I rarely use presets because I find that one or even a few rarely maximize the potential of a set of photos. I am sure that this methodology is why my images lack consistency.

Can anyone provide advice on how you have dealt with this issue?
How are you editing your photos? Consistency requires a workflow. How can you be consistent if you don't follow a workflow every time.

Unless you're shooting manual WB, that is the first thing that needs adjusted. A neutral WB will have the right side of the histogram even for all three color channels.(RGB) Most people don't like a neautral WB, but a little on the warm side, so you will have to develop an eye for it. I like to start with neutral and then go from there. I usually go with what looks the best, not neutral, but at least i have a consistent starting point.

Next i always adjust levels. With LR you would use the exposure and blacks sliders. The gama is close to the fill light and recovery sliders.

Next i adjust curves.

Next , small scale contrast-------clarity slider on LR

Those are a few things EVERY image needs.

After that , you have to step back and look at the image to see what else needs fixed. Does it need some contrast if so, on the whole image or just a small part. Move the slider and see if different areas need different amounts or if one amount on the whole image is ok. What about saturation or vibrance, graduated filter on the sky, what ever is needed, fix them one at a time.

Last is sharpening and any areas that need extra sharpening.

Do everything in the same order every time and you will become more consistent.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-15-2010, 12:27 AM
LeeR's Avatar
Professional Wanderer
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Gainesville, Florida
Posts: 1,611
Default

In the highly competitive world of photography a lot of photographers work hard to develop a recognizable 'style.' This is a double edge sword. If your style catches on you may find not only that art directors are demanding the 'Barickman style' but other photographers are doing their best to imitate it. However, it can also cubbyhole you into something you have grown out of and no longer wish to pursue. For these reasons I encourage phothgraphers not to waste too much time pursuing a recognizable style. Keep your options open.
Having said that, I think there is a Barickman style beginning to develop if your website is any indication. This is OK. Just do your best to to keep your style as broad as possible.
__________________
Lee R
http://lucentbydesign.blogspot.com//
The real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes but in having new eyes.
-Marcel Proust
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-15-2010, 01:18 PM
abarickman's Avatar
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chicago Burbs
Posts: 587
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dakwegmo View Post
A lot of it has to do with marketing/branding. Pro photographers are good at distinguishing themselves from the competition, so they'll show the work that sets them apart. Even if they have a variety of styles, or are willing to do whatever a client asks, they aren't going to advertise the work that makes them look like everyone else.

If you take all of your landscape photos, or your portraits, or whatever and start grouping them together you'll probably see that similar themed shots have more of a consistent look than you realize.
I think that you are right. If I were to shoot all landscape or all studio or all portrait developing a consistent style would be easier.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CiiVii View Post
If you study some of the best photographers what you will see is not a gimmick, but someone who has been successful in conveying what they see through their eyes.
I agree good photography is no gimmick. I am not looking for the gimmick just some tips on having my PP be more even and consistent. I know that garbage in - garbage out is true. If I don't start with good material no PP is going to save it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by PrimeTime View Post
How are you editing your photos? Consistency requires a workflow. How can you be consistent if you don't follow a workflow every time.

Unless you're shooting manual WB, that is the first thing that needs adjusted. A neutral WB will have the right side of the histogram even for all three color channels.(RGB) Most people don't like a neautral WB, but a little on the warm side, so you will have to develop an eye for it. I like to start with neutral and then go from there. I usually go with what looks the best, not neutral, but at least i have a consistent starting point.

Next i always adjust levels. With LR you would use the exposure and blacks sliders. The gama is close to the fill light and recovery sliders.

Next i adjust curves.

Next , small scale contrast-------clarity slider on LR

Those are a few things EVERY image needs.

After that , you have to step back and look at the image to see what else needs fixed. Does it need some contrast if so, on the whole image or just a small part. Move the slider and see if different areas need different amounts or if one amount on the whole image is ok. What about saturation or vibrance, graduated filter on the sky, what ever is needed, fix them one at a time.

Last is sharpening and any areas that need extra sharpening.

Do everything in the same order every time and you will become more consistent.
I do have a very consistent workflow in Lightroom. I work top to bottom in the develop module. It follow very closely with what you have outlined above. WB is a good point though as I do struggle with it at times. Carrying a grey card or getting an expo disc I think would help me start with a more consistent starting point. Thanks.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LeeR View Post
In the highly competitive world of photography a lot of photographers work hard to develop a recognizable 'style.' This is a double edge sword. If your style catches on you may find not only that art directors are demanding the 'Barickman style' but other photographers are doing their best to imitate it. However, it can also cubbyhole you into something you have grown out of and no longer wish to pursue. For these reasons I encourage phothgraphers not to waste too much time pursuing a recognizable style. Keep your options open.
Having said that, I think there is a Barickman style beginning to develop if your website is any indication. This is OK. Just do your best to to keep your style as broad as possible.
Thanks Lee. I feel like right now I just want to explore different PP techniques and get moderately good at them so that I can apply the right tool to the right job. Once I become more comfortable I want to narrow down the styles (ie. Split toning, textures, desaturated etc) I use so that as a whole my photography is more consistent.

Thanks all and If anyone has any other ideas I would love to hear them.
__________________

AJ Barickman Fine Imagery
Photostream
Canon 40D | Canon 24mm-70mm F2.8L | Canon EF 70mm-200mm F4 L IS | Canon EF 50mm F1.4 | Canon 100mm F2.8 Macro |
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0