#1 (permalink)  
Old 04-26-2009, 03:39 PM
I'm new here!
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2
Default B/W Question

Do people feel that taking digital photo's with your DSLR in the B/W setting produces better contrast that simply changing a colour shot to B/W. I'm thinking about if the starting point for post production brings better final results or no better.
Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-26-2009, 03:42 PM
OsmosisStudios's Avatar
Don't Panic
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Mississauga / Ottawa
Posts: 11,376
Default

When you make a colour picture into a black and white in post, you need to do more than just lower saturation.

There are countless tutorials on how to properly transform a colour photo to black and white, so I won't google any: most are pretty good.

That being said, even B/W film has a tendency to be very un constrasty at times, especially if it's over-exposed by more than 1/3 of a stop. I always digitally alter my B/W photos, be they film or digital.
__________________
I am responsible for what I say; not what you understand.
OsmosisStudios
Gear List
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-27-2009, 02:37 PM
maxharvard
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Philhorn View Post
Do people feel that taking digital photo's with your DSLR in the B/W setting produces better contrast that simply changing a colour shot to B/W.

Nope.

~Eric
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-27-2009, 02:55 PM
dcclark's Avatar
Moderates the loving team
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Houghton, MI
Posts: 2,359
Default

Right. I always take the shot in color, then convert to B&W using Gimp's channel mixer, plus some curves/contrast adjustments. That can produce a much more dramatic and contrasty effect than just using your camera's defaults.
__________________
David Clark Photography, project 365 photo blog, flickr.
It is OK to edit and repost my photos on the DPS forums only.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-27-2009, 03:45 PM
FoG's Avatar
FoG FoG is offline
dPS +1000 Club
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: North West UK
Posts: 2,604
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Philhorn View Post
Do people feel that taking digital photo's with your DSLR in the B/W setting produces better contrast that simply changing a colour shot to B/W. I'm thinking about if the starting point for post production brings better final results or no better.
Thanks
I tried my Black and white setting for the first time the other day and although the pic was ok it had a slightly over exposed feel to it when I reduced this it was still just ok ... I took the same shot in colour and messed about with in PP and BINGO it got the wow factor...

I think to get a picture right in B&W with instant WOW takes some practice and knowledge so practice practice practice
__________________
Camera Canon A560. Fujifilm S700, Nikon D60 with 18-55 Kit Lens and Polarising Filter and a book on what the buttones do......
Flickr
HELM Web Design
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-27-2009, 04:21 PM
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 81
Default

I'm not sure if anyone else agrees with this, but I was told once that if you want to do B/W photography with a dSLR, take all your photos in RAW, that gives you the greatest control over the output. NEVER shoot in any sort of color mode from your camera, you can reproduce any one of them from your PC, doing so only limits your output options.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-27-2009, 04:26 PM
FoG's Avatar
FoG FoG is offline
dPS +1000 Club
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: North West UK
Posts: 2,604
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zarquon View Post
I'm not sure if anyone else agrees with this, but I was told once that if you want to do B/W photography with a dSLR, take all your photos in RAW, that gives you the greatest control over the output. NEVER shoot in any sort of color mode from your camera, you can reproduce any one of them from your PC, doing so only limits your output options.
I dinne have RAW capability so did not know that if it is true. I know RAW saves more bits in colour and that is about it ... but surely shooting in RAW and colur gives more options or do on of each and the play in PP to see which works best anyhoo
__________________
Camera Canon A560. Fujifilm S700, Nikon D60 with 18-55 Kit Lens and Polarising Filter and a book on what the buttones do......
Flickr
HELM Web Design
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-28-2009, 02:46 AM
OsmosisStudios's Avatar
Don't Panic
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Mississauga / Ottawa
Posts: 11,376
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zarquon View Post
I'm not sure if anyone else agrees with this, but I was told once that if you want to do B/W photography with a dSLR, take all your photos in RAW, that gives you the greatest control over the output. NEVER shoot in any sort of color mode from your camera, you can reproduce any one of them from your PC, doing so only limits your output options.
Most cameras wont allow you to use colour modes and such if youre shooting RAW.
__________________
I am responsible for what I say; not what you understand.
OsmosisStudios
Gear List
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-28-2009, 02:49 AM
dPS Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 81
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OsmosisStudios View Post
Most cameras wont allow you to use colour modes and such if youre shooting RAW.
I must have merged the two, shoot raw if you can, but if you shoot JPEG, always shoot in normal color mode, do any effects you want in PP.

Same thing you'd do with video.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 04-28-2009, 08:17 PM
BryanC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 1,423
Default

...This thread has me really curious about some things. I have a Sony a200 dslr that came bundled with it's own software: Sony Image Data Converter. I shoot pretty much exclusively in Raw format. When I upload my images from the camera, this is the program that's used to open them.
... To start with, in Raw format, I can shoot in any of the color or 'creative styles', as it's termed in camera, that the camera has to offer: Standard, Vivid, Portrait, Landscape, Night View, Sunset, B&W, or Adobe RGB. And for each of these settings, there is Contrast, Saturation and Sharpness settings. In addition to these, there are White Balance controls, D RangeOptimizer settings, Color Temperature and Color Filter settings, and Noise Reduction controls. All of these can be set in camera, in Raw mode.
... When I upload images to the computer, and open them in the Image Data Converter, all of the above settings are available to me, in addition to a few more (Tone Curves, cropping, etc). I can change the camera settings in the program, which I assume is using the sensor data, to alter the images as if those settings were used when the image was taken.
... As an example for this particular discussion, I can shoot an image in color, in Raw, upload it, and convert to b&w. I can also take an image in b&w, upload it, and convert it to color. Again, I'm assuming since it's in Raw, it's using the sensor data to do this. I have done comparison shots and see no difference in the images.
... After discovering this capability, I keep the little detail settings on either 'auto' or at zero value. I then do the tweaking when uploaded. I couldn't imagine having to play around with all of those settings in camera while out shooting different subjects, in changing conditions. If I'm purposely shooting for b&w images, I will put the camera in that mode. It's more of a mental thing, seeing them in b&w on the LCD, getting the feel for what I'm accomplishing. Knowing, at least it seems so, that the sensor is still capturing all of the data it can.
... So I guess the curious part is, do Nikons, Canons, etc...have these capabilties or is this a 'Sony thing'? Do they come bundled with Raw software like this? It's something I haven't really heard mentioned, and there's been so much discussion regarding shooting in Raw vs. Jpeg, where there's been the certain opinions that 'Raw' is a pain, too much work, etc., etc., etc., that it makes me scratch my head sometimes. After uploading my images to the computer, I can do all of these tweaks while still in Raw, and then save as Raw, or either Tiff 8 or 16 bit, or 4 different levels of Jpeg quality and compression.
... I have rambled on enough, but as I said, was very curious if the other brands have these capabilities.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

What’s Your Preference?

Daily Digest

Each day we send out a quick email to thousands of DPS readers to notify them of updates. This email is just short excerpt of the first few lines of our latest post with a link if you want to read it all. You can unsubscribe from this this service at any time.

This service is provided by a third party (Feedburner) and you can subscribe to it by leaving your email address in the following field and confirming your subscription when you get an email asking you to do so.

Enter your email address for
Daily Updates:

Weekly Summary

For those wanting a weekly summary of what happens on this site this free email newsletter is probably your best option. It includes a summary of the tips posted to the site each week. This newsletter is subscribed to by over 25000 readers (many who also subscribe to the other options above) - come join the community!

To subscribe to this weekly newsletter simply add your email address to the following field and then follow the confirmation prompts. You will be able to unsubscribe at any time.

Enter your email address for
Free Weekly Newsletter:

 
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0