wulf
06-13-2007, 10:26 AM
I was up early this morning (explanations on my <a href="http://www.web-den.org.uk/cgi-bin/wulfblosxom/2007/06/13#wakingup.20070613">blog</a>) and so decided to go out and water some of the plants in the garden. As often happens, I was inspired by what I saw and rushed back in to get my camera....
One of the subjects I chose was the climbing rose. I had the camera on its tripod but couldn't find a particularly exciting position. Then I had the idea of putting the legs together and using it to lift the camera up in the air, taking pictures using a two second time delay. Below are the best of the results:
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photo.gne?id=543621134" title="Rose - Remote Shot #1"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/1170/543621134_3d46c064e7_m.jpg" title="Rose - Remote Shot #1" alt="Rose - Remote Shot #1" width="240" height="159" /></a>
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/wulf/543621126/" title="Rose - Remote Shot #2 (by basswulf)"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/1159/543621126_145cc9daf1_m.jpg" title="Rose - Remote Shot #2 (by basswulf)" alt="Rose - Remote Shot #2 (by basswulf)" width="240" height="159" /></a>
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/wulf/543621118/" title="Rose - Remote Shot #3 (by basswulf)"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/1153/543621118_426926437e_m.jpg" title="Rose - Remote Shot #3 (by basswulf)" alt="Rose - Remote Shot #3 (by basswulf)" width="240" height="159" /></a>
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/wulf/543621104/" title="Rose - Remote Shot #4 (by basswulf)"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/1252/543621104_a8fbdbdaa2_m.jpg" title="Rose - Remote Shot #4 (by basswulf)" alt="Rose - Remote Shot #4 (by basswulf)" width="240" height="159" /></a>
I think the best rose was probably the one in the fourth shot - it is a shame that was the picture with the blandest background! However, I will definitely try this idea again in future - it gives a different perspective without the peril of "camera tossing"!
Lessons I will try to remember next time:
1. Composition can be hit or miss (and largely miss in my case!). I should have used some reference points in how I was holding the tripod so I could view the shot and then return to take a similar one with minor adjustments (lots of pictures missed the flowers altogether or cut them off awkwardly).
2. Manual focus (the last shot) worked much better than autofocus. A camera with more focal points (only 3 on the D40) might do better, as long as it picked the right one to use. With manual focus, you can set it for a particular distance and then just have to get the lens that far from the subject for it to be sharp.
I would be interested to see other pictures taken using a similar approach and hear any other ideas on how to improve the results.
Wulf
One of the subjects I chose was the climbing rose. I had the camera on its tripod but couldn't find a particularly exciting position. Then I had the idea of putting the legs together and using it to lift the camera up in the air, taking pictures using a two second time delay. Below are the best of the results:
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photo.gne?id=543621134" title="Rose - Remote Shot #1"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/1170/543621134_3d46c064e7_m.jpg" title="Rose - Remote Shot #1" alt="Rose - Remote Shot #1" width="240" height="159" /></a>
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/wulf/543621126/" title="Rose - Remote Shot #2 (by basswulf)"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/1159/543621126_145cc9daf1_m.jpg" title="Rose - Remote Shot #2 (by basswulf)" alt="Rose - Remote Shot #2 (by basswulf)" width="240" height="159" /></a>
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/wulf/543621118/" title="Rose - Remote Shot #3 (by basswulf)"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/1153/543621118_426926437e_m.jpg" title="Rose - Remote Shot #3 (by basswulf)" alt="Rose - Remote Shot #3 (by basswulf)" width="240" height="159" /></a>
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/wulf/543621104/" title="Rose - Remote Shot #4 (by basswulf)"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/1252/543621104_a8fbdbdaa2_m.jpg" title="Rose - Remote Shot #4 (by basswulf)" alt="Rose - Remote Shot #4 (by basswulf)" width="240" height="159" /></a>
I think the best rose was probably the one in the fourth shot - it is a shame that was the picture with the blandest background! However, I will definitely try this idea again in future - it gives a different perspective without the peril of "camera tossing"!
Lessons I will try to remember next time:
1. Composition can be hit or miss (and largely miss in my case!). I should have used some reference points in how I was holding the tripod so I could view the shot and then return to take a similar one with minor adjustments (lots of pictures missed the flowers altogether or cut them off awkwardly).
2. Manual focus (the last shot) worked much better than autofocus. A camera with more focal points (only 3 on the D40) might do better, as long as it picked the right one to use. With manual focus, you can set it for a particular distance and then just have to get the lens that far from the subject for it to be sharp.
I would be interested to see other pictures taken using a similar approach and hear any other ideas on how to improve the results.
Wulf