[chojuan]

Come on fellows, let's face it. Euphemisms are not necessary here. I've been always wondering about the same issue and I always get onto the same wall. If it weren`t the camera, nobody would ever buy a Nixon D3 or D3x (as the man in the video refers to Nikon), a Camon 1Ds Mark III or 1D Mark IV (sorry, I meant Canon) or worse than those; a Hasselblad (any of them). Obviously, being creative is something that a device cannot give you; but the versatility of a good machine, sometimes, can simulate a talent which doesn't really exist.

What I really like about this kind of discussions is that it is always those photographers who've got the best gear the ones who try to encourage people to believe that better machines aren't necessary.

Anyway, this topic will last forever. At least, until everybody has the same kind of gear.