Well that was the other thought, if I get the Sigma 18-50 or Tamron 17-50 (both f/2.8) Then I could also spend a few extra bucks on the Sigma 70-300 APO and have a pretty good range covered for around $650, still less than the Nikon 18-200 ($750). I dont see getting the 70-200 f/2.8 within atleast the next year or two so I would like some sort of long tele and thought the 70-300 could fill that gap for the time being.
Oh geez there is another option thrown in the pot. Any other ideas, im pullin my hair out here.
|