11-03-2009, 02:43 PM
|
 |
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Trinidad, Co
Posts: 16,157
|
|
It is marketable as its a very popular pose.
I do think the legs could be brightened up a hair, and a bit more contrast is needed inthe pants. The "naked" legs seem a bit soft tho and even a little grainy. (this is where that info comes in handy)
If you are at your pc where you did your processing you can find your exif or mata data, usually under image information. Sometimes you can alao right click and look under preoperties to find it. Flickr will also save that info for you where it's handy to get at
I like the fact that you have one with the pants rolle dup and the other without. And one smaller. Reminds me of the old photos of kids going fishin
__________________
Olympus user, Fuji E900, a canon & last but not least a Minolta 35mm and some really old large format box cameras.Not to mention a whole bunch of other stuff. Paint Shop Pro X3, CS3,CS5, Portrait Professional, Topaz Adjust, Lucis Art and the list goes on........
www.alockintime.com
Facebook
|