View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 10-13-2007, 04:43 PM
wulf's Avatar
wulf wulf is offline
Ninja Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 9,665
Default

I am struggling to work out which way to vote. I think that, even since getting a better tripod in mid-June, the majority of my shots have still been taken without one. However, the proportion is probably much nearer 50/50 than 80/20.

A lot depends on the subject and the lens. If I'm out with my 70-300mm, I will probably lug the tripod along although I've had some pretty good results hand holding as long as the light is good. My self portraits are generally done with a tripod. Most of my flora and fauna macros are handheld, as I often seek angles where a tripod would be hard to position or where a breeze necessitates a fast shutter speed and so camera shake is not the biggest concern.

I will ponder it a bit more...

Wulf
__________________
Wulf Forrester-Barker << Sites: blog / flickr >>
Gear: Nikon D40, Nikon AFS 18-55mm f/3.5 - 5.6G, Nikon Series E 50mm f/1.8, Nikon AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6G, Vivitar 90mm f/2.5 macro, Raynox DCR-250, Lensbaby 2.0k, SB600
Reply With Quote