Thread: Filters? UV?
View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2008, 09:07 PM
Major_Small's Avatar
Major_Small Major_Small is offline
Prime Lens | 1000- 2000 Posts
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,572
Default

You should always have a UV filter on every lens at all times. Always. A good (multicoated) filter won't degrade image quality, and it protects your lens. Even if you've got a lens hood on to protect from impacts, it'll protect from dust, sand, etc.

I can't stress this enough, mostly because my 30D just took it's first big tumble the other day, and the UV filter saved the lens. This is the third or fourth time I've had that happen. (The previous times were on other bodies).

The old argument against it is that you're shooting through a cheap piece of glass. Be assured that if all the glass in your lens was made to the same demanding specifications as the glass in a quality UV filter, it'd probably cost into the thousands, even for a kit lens. The lens may be more expensive than a filter, but divide that cost by all the pieces of glass and all the moving parts and all the mechanical equipment and all the engineering that goes into them, and you end up with relatively cheap glass.
__________________
Zooomr|Flickr|Big Stock Photo|dreamstime
All work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License unless otherwise noted. (meaning you can edit and repost my images unless I specifically ask you not to)
All post-processing done with The Gimp

Last edited by Major_Small; 07-15-2008 at 09:51 PM. Reason: Clarified that second paragraph.
Reply With Quote