<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital SLR vs Digital Super-Zoom Cameras on Safari</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digital-photography-school.com/digital-slr-vs-digital-super-zoom-cameras-on-safari/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/digital-slr-vs-digital-super-zoom-cameras-on-safari</link>
	<description>Discover how to use your digital camera with our Digital Photography Tips. We are a community of photographers of all experience levels who come together to learn, share and grow in our understanding of photography.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:37:20 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fredshome</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/digital-slr-vs-digital-super-zoom-cameras-on-safari/comment-page-1#comment-66170</link>
		<dc:creator>Fredshome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 12:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=3308#comment-66170</guid>
		<description>To Thomas just above,

first, I am so jealous because I&#039;d love to do this ;)

Second I&#039;ve been to Africa a few times, I&#039;ll go back soon to Ethiopia to go see the volcanoes and the animals. My first post was a quickie so I&#039;ll elaborate here.

I&#039;ve been a (kind of admittedly weird because I never got along with the industry, ad and TV) image professional for a lot of my life, but I&#039;ve never made a living with photography (of course like a number of people here I&#039;d like to, but there&#039;s no market and weddings really aren&#039;t my thing).

Anyway, I&#039;m really into &quot;the right gear for the right task&quot;, but I certainly wouldn&#039;t overdo it. And nowadays there are a number of bridge cameras (or superzooms since some like to call them that) that are definitely good enough. (I mostly take nature photos, I still haven&#039;t figured out why, but I can&#039;t take portraits worth a damn... I&#039;ve started to work on it... with no discernible result so far). So If you want to go with that, it&#039;s probably a valid choice, depending on what the images are for.

On the other hand, I know that on my camera, I default to aperture priority because it lets me control depth of field easily, and Pentax&#039;s &quot;green button&quot; lets me switch to auto mode in a pinch (and I can change speed with the back wheel anyway). This lets me control what *kind* of image I want to take which IMO is in part what makes the difference between a vacation snapshot and a photographer&#039;s image. Of course this is a very personal POV so each person will have to figure it out on his/her own. Experimentation with as wide as possible a range of hardware is the best way to find what you&#039;re comfortable with.

IMO, you need two cameras. One for wildlife, one for &quot;street&quot; photography. Although you didn&#039;t really say what your interest was (or your lens set), one would tend to use a SLR body in the wild (a stabilised one like the Sony would do fine with the right lenses), and something smaller in villages or cities (a bridge or compact).

You definitely need a backup (if your bridge can double for wildlife, it&#039;s certainly better,  since your SLR is the most fragile), because you will *not* find service in the field. You will need at least two batteries (or sets) for each of your cameras because power sources can be hard to find. You will need a laptop (or dedicated &quot;dump drive&quot; to dump your data to because you certainly won&#039;t find any spare flash cards (well, you will, but good luck to you if you try using them).

Now I don&#039;t know how familiar you are with Africa (subsaharian). You&#039;ll meet lots of awfully nice people who will go way out of their way to be agreeable to you, as long as you are just a regular nice person (just make sure you&#039;re more or less current on the local do&#039;s and don&#039;t, although they&#039;ll be tolerant on account on your being foreign). You&#039;ll meet a lot of extremely poor (by western standard) people. In places you&#039;ll meet some actually *starving* people. As in &quot;I don&#039;t have the strength to chase the flies from my eyes&quot; starving.

In any case do *not* give money (except to the village chief if you have been properly introduced). Presents are fine (recommended really although their nature depends on the location) if you visit people. To children that will pester you, pens, bottles, notebooks, *never* money.  If you want to, find a local non profit thingie and give money to *them*.

Sorry, I strayed a bit...

In short. My ideal hardware for Africa would be my Pentax SLR (and assorted lens)  plus some sort of G-series Canon compact (I&#039;ve tried numerous compacts and I&#039;m *very* partial to those). Beyond that, you *absolutely* need a PC (any kind of laptop, PC, a fruity one, whatever, they&#039;re all the same), or a portable disk to dump your cards into. Remember that you will *not* find any kind of broadband (above 28K, it&#039;s broadband in the bush) link to backup your images. Y&#039;ou&#039;ll be able to upload a few pics to a blog, sure, but something like a backup is right out.

Remember to check with your insurance company if your camera(s) and your lens(es) (and all the assorted hardware crap that we all carry along side) are covered.

And get your shots. And go see a doc beforehand to get what you might need in the bush (trust me, I&#039;m the type that kind of dismisses doctors it but being unable to walk because of a bug caught in the bush because of a *scratch* I had in Paris was kind of weird). And no, you won&#039;t find it there.

And I know reading this was kind of alarmist. But you&#039;ll have lots of fun. Lots. And you&#039;ll take great pics. And you&#039;ll have great stories to tell. 
You&#039;ll love it (well, maybe you won&#039;t love the continent, it *is* kind of weird), but you *will* love the experience. 

And You&#039;ll want to do it again. 

Trust me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Thomas just above,</p>
<p>first, I am so jealous because I&#8217;d love to do this ;)</p>
<p>Second I&#8217;ve been to Africa a few times, I&#8217;ll go back soon to Ethiopia to go see the volcanoes and the animals. My first post was a quickie so I&#8217;ll elaborate here.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been a (kind of admittedly weird because I never got along with the industry, ad and TV) image professional for a lot of my life, but I&#8217;ve never made a living with photography (of course like a number of people here I&#8217;d like to, but there&#8217;s no market and weddings really aren&#8217;t my thing).</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;m really into &#8220;the right gear for the right task&#8221;, but I certainly wouldn&#8217;t overdo it. And nowadays there are a number of bridge cameras (or superzooms since some like to call them that) that are definitely good enough. (I mostly take nature photos, I still haven&#8217;t figured out why, but I can&#8217;t take portraits worth a damn&#8230; I&#8217;ve started to work on it&#8230; with no discernible result so far). So If you want to go with that, it&#8217;s probably a valid choice, depending on what the images are for.</p>
<p>On the other hand, I know that on my camera, I default to aperture priority because it lets me control depth of field easily, and Pentax&#8217;s &#8220;green button&#8221; lets me switch to auto mode in a pinch (and I can change speed with the back wheel anyway). This lets me control what *kind* of image I want to take which IMO is in part what makes the difference between a vacation snapshot and a photographer&#8217;s image. Of course this is a very personal POV so each person will have to figure it out on his/her own. Experimentation with as wide as possible a range of hardware is the best way to find what you&#8217;re comfortable with.</p>
<p>IMO, you need two cameras. One for wildlife, one for &#8220;street&#8221; photography. Although you didn&#8217;t really say what your interest was (or your lens set), one would tend to use a SLR body in the wild (a stabilised one like the Sony would do fine with the right lenses), and something smaller in villages or cities (a bridge or compact).</p>
<p>You definitely need a backup (if your bridge can double for wildlife, it&#8217;s certainly better,  since your SLR is the most fragile), because you will *not* find service in the field. You will need at least two batteries (or sets) for each of your cameras because power sources can be hard to find. You will need a laptop (or dedicated &#8220;dump drive&#8221; to dump your data to because you certainly won&#8217;t find any spare flash cards (well, you will, but good luck to you if you try using them).</p>
<p>Now I don&#8217;t know how familiar you are with Africa (subsaharian). You&#8217;ll meet lots of awfully nice people who will go way out of their way to be agreeable to you, as long as you are just a regular nice person (just make sure you&#8217;re more or less current on the local do&#8217;s and don&#8217;t, although they&#8217;ll be tolerant on account on your being foreign). You&#8217;ll meet a lot of extremely poor (by western standard) people. In places you&#8217;ll meet some actually *starving* people. As in &#8220;I don&#8217;t have the strength to chase the flies from my eyes&#8221; starving.</p>
<p>In any case do *not* give money (except to the village chief if you have been properly introduced). Presents are fine (recommended really although their nature depends on the location) if you visit people. To children that will pester you, pens, bottles, notebooks, *never* money.  If you want to, find a local non profit thingie and give money to *them*.</p>
<p>Sorry, I strayed a bit&#8230;</p>
<p>In short. My ideal hardware for Africa would be my Pentax SLR (and assorted lens)  plus some sort of G-series Canon compact (I&#8217;ve tried numerous compacts and I&#8217;m *very* partial to those). Beyond that, you *absolutely* need a PC (any kind of laptop, PC, a fruity one, whatever, they&#8217;re all the same), or a portable disk to dump your cards into. Remember that you will *not* find any kind of broadband (above 28K, it&#8217;s broadband in the bush) link to backup your images. Y&#8217;ou&#8217;ll be able to upload a few pics to a blog, sure, but something like a backup is right out.</p>
<p>Remember to check with your insurance company if your camera(s) and your lens(es) (and all the assorted hardware crap that we all carry along side) are covered.</p>
<p>And get your shots. And go see a doc beforehand to get what you might need in the bush (trust me, I&#8217;m the type that kind of dismisses doctors it but being unable to walk because of a bug caught in the bush because of a *scratch* I had in Paris was kind of weird). And no, you won&#8217;t find it there.</p>
<p>And I know reading this was kind of alarmist. But you&#8217;ll have lots of fun. Lots. And you&#8217;ll take great pics. And you&#8217;ll have great stories to tell.<br />
You&#8217;ll love it (well, maybe you won&#8217;t love the continent, it *is* kind of weird), but you *will* love the experience. </p>
<p>And You&#8217;ll want to do it again. </p>
<p>Trust me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Dönnebrink</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/digital-slr-vs-digital-super-zoom-cameras-on-safari/comment-page-1#comment-66163</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Dönnebrink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 07:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=3308#comment-66163</guid>
		<description>Hi Jason,

your article popped up as search result when I typed in: import  Lumix DMC-FZ18  pics in  iphoto &#039;09 into Google. 

I loved to read your article and the many responses it received - a quick thanks to you Jason and the other folks.  -  I do agree with Jason . i have traveled quite a bit and found it more and more inconvenient (and sometimes kind of inappropriate in a social or cultural way or context) to carry around a big SLR equipment and having to change the lenses often (or at least I feel inclined to do so since I spent some money to buy different ones). So for the consideration of  the trade-off between best quality and price, weight, convenience there can also be this social component interesting. Trying to say: everything that helps to reduce handling and worrying about the equipment leaves more time for and a better focus on the stuff you are trying to shoot, be it wild game, landscape, local people, events etc. So trying to get more involved personally and mentally into the environment you are in - be it in the bush, among people or in an event - and trying to grasp the spirit, getting a better understanding or a closer contact might also improve the possibility (or occasion) to take a better shot, even with a less quality equipment.

 Which equipment or mix of equipment to take for my next big trip - just started to plan a year-long across Africa trip - most likely with a LandRover all the way overland. - is an important question for me at the moment. Safari and shooting animals (with the camera, of course) will be an important part of the journey, but just one among others - like meeting travelers, expats and especially local people, seeing the countries and understanding the culture and society about which I would like to report (via pictures, small videos and articles).


 Suggestions from you guys are highly welcomed  concerning choice and mix of equipment. Given the fact that I will be traveling with my own car (LandRover) I guess I will stick to rhermans suggestion to take a 
a) DSLR (Currently I have a Sony Alpha 100)
b) compact superzoom (Currently I have Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ18)
c) back-up (Currently I Panasonic Lumix FZ5)
And take out (and carry) concerning the occasion and event. 
But, as necessary and as affordable I would like to upgrade on the equipment. For the intentions I have camera a) and b) need to have the feature to write the GPS data into the picture. So recommendations or insights of you are HIGHLY WELCOMED 

Thanks and greetings to you all
Thomas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jason,</p>
<p>your article popped up as search result when I typed in: import  Lumix DMC-FZ18  pics in  iphoto &#8216;09 into Google. </p>
<p>I loved to read your article and the many responses it received &#8211; a quick thanks to you Jason and the other folks.  &#8211;  I do agree with Jason . i have traveled quite a bit and found it more and more inconvenient (and sometimes kind of inappropriate in a social or cultural way or context) to carry around a big SLR equipment and having to change the lenses often (or at least I feel inclined to do so since I spent some money to buy different ones). So for the consideration of  the trade-off between best quality and price, weight, convenience there can also be this social component interesting. Trying to say: everything that helps to reduce handling and worrying about the equipment leaves more time for and a better focus on the stuff you are trying to shoot, be it wild game, landscape, local people, events etc. So trying to get more involved personally and mentally into the environment you are in &#8211; be it in the bush, among people or in an event &#8211; and trying to grasp the spirit, getting a better understanding or a closer contact might also improve the possibility (or occasion) to take a better shot, even with a less quality equipment.</p>
<p> Which equipment or mix of equipment to take for my next big trip &#8211; just started to plan a year-long across Africa trip &#8211; most likely with a LandRover all the way overland. &#8211; is an important question for me at the moment. Safari and shooting animals (with the camera, of course) will be an important part of the journey, but just one among others &#8211; like meeting travelers, expats and especially local people, seeing the countries and understanding the culture and society about which I would like to report (via pictures, small videos and articles).</p>
<p> Suggestions from you guys are highly welcomed  concerning choice and mix of equipment. Given the fact that I will be traveling with my own car (LandRover) I guess I will stick to rhermans suggestion to take a<br />
a) DSLR (Currently I have a Sony Alpha 100)<br />
b) compact superzoom (Currently I have Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ18)<br />
c) back-up (Currently I Panasonic Lumix FZ5)<br />
And take out (and carry) concerning the occasion and event.<br />
But, as necessary and as affordable I would like to upgrade on the equipment. For the intentions I have camera a) and b) need to have the feature to write the GPS data into the picture. So recommendations or insights of you are HIGHLY WELCOMED </p>
<p>Thanks and greetings to you all<br />
Thomas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Thompson</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/digital-slr-vs-digital-super-zoom-cameras-on-safari/comment-page-1#comment-63069</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 16:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=3308#comment-63069</guid>
		<description>Great article - thanks Jason (and everyone else who has contributed). 

As you know, having been on one of our safaris to The Gambia in December 2007, I run an adventure &amp; wildlife safari holiday company - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hiddengambia.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Hidden Gambia Holidays&lt;/a&gt;. I&#039;ve just returned from the British Birdwatching Fair last weekend where I was trying to weigh up the merits of buying a good superzoom vs. SLR. 

Your article has helped sway me towards the former, specifically the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ38 which has received some great reviews. Whilst I&#039;m sure the purists are correct that SLRs have some benefits over superzooms, portability &amp; cost are important factors for me. And I&#039;m sure the improved video handling will come in handy. At £245 - it seems like a good purchase to me!

PS. Good to see you&#039;re still on top of the SEO game - well done!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article &#8211; thanks Jason (and everyone else who has contributed). </p>
<p>As you know, having been on one of our safaris to The Gambia in December 2007, I run an adventure &amp; wildlife safari holiday company &#8211; <a href="http://www.hiddengambia.com" rel="nofollow">Hidden Gambia Holidays</a>. I&#8217;ve just returned from the British Birdwatching Fair last weekend where I was trying to weigh up the merits of buying a good superzoom vs. SLR. </p>
<p>Your article has helped sway me towards the former, specifically the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ38 which has received some great reviews. Whilst I&#8217;m sure the purists are correct that SLRs have some benefits over superzooms, portability &amp; cost are important factors for me. And I&#8217;m sure the improved video handling will come in handy. At £245 &#8211; it seems like a good purchase to me!</p>
<p>PS. Good to see you&#8217;re still on top of the SEO game &#8211; well done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorraine</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/digital-slr-vs-digital-super-zoom-cameras-on-safari/comment-page-1#comment-50997</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorraine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 13:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=3308#comment-50997</guid>
		<description>Thanks again douglasec, your insight is very much appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks again douglasec, your insight is very much appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: douglasec</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/digital-slr-vs-digital-super-zoom-cameras-on-safari/comment-page-1#comment-50936</link>
		<dc:creator>douglasec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 01:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=3308#comment-50936</guid>
		<description>Lorraine - just personal experience - I got 2 brands of cards for a recent trip to VietNam and formatted one of each in the camera, but the other two were recognized by the camera and seemed fine so I didn&#039;t bother (not that I was trying to experiment, I was just in a rush to pack) - I could shoot and see the photos on the display in JPEG+RAW on my Canon XS with all of them, but when it came time to import them, the ones i had NOT formatted in the camera had all corrupt RAW files (but luckily the JPEGs were all OK) but the shots from the camera-formatted cards transferred fine in both JPEG and RAW - when I reformatted the &quot;bad&quot; cards in the camera, they worked with RAW, too. So I&#039;m not sure why that happened, but I&#039;m now a believer that you format IN THE CAMERA at least once when you first get the cards. After that the format should stay consistent if you just erase photos, but I&#039;ve also heard from others that the cards are more reliable if you format them once in a while anyway. The camera companies all use the same types of cards, BUT they apparently come differently organized from what some of the cameras need to see to work correctly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lorraine &#8211; just personal experience &#8211; I got 2 brands of cards for a recent trip to VietNam and formatted one of each in the camera, but the other two were recognized by the camera and seemed fine so I didn&#8217;t bother (not that I was trying to experiment, I was just in a rush to pack) &#8211; I could shoot and see the photos on the display in JPEG+RAW on my Canon XS with all of them, but when it came time to import them, the ones i had NOT formatted in the camera had all corrupt RAW files (but luckily the JPEGs were all OK) but the shots from the camera-formatted cards transferred fine in both JPEG and RAW &#8211; when I reformatted the &#8220;bad&#8221; cards in the camera, they worked with RAW, too. So I&#8217;m not sure why that happened, but I&#8217;m now a believer that you format IN THE CAMERA at least once when you first get the cards. After that the format should stay consistent if you just erase photos, but I&#8217;ve also heard from others that the cards are more reliable if you format them once in a while anyway. The camera companies all use the same types of cards, BUT they apparently come differently organized from what some of the cameras need to see to work correctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorraine</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/digital-slr-vs-digital-super-zoom-cameras-on-safari/comment-page-1#comment-50890</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorraine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 20:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=3308#comment-50890</guid>
		<description>Thanks so much for all the great info and advice. I have been trying to get through all the features by reading the manual but there&#039;s nothing like in the field training. Would prefer not to be learning in Africa so I have taking photos everyday and may even take a trip to the Central Park Zoo just for more practice.  The various features of this camera will keep me busy for a long time (i have not read anything about that self leveling feature - something I really need - that fabulous!)  I&#039;ve already gotten 2 extra batteries (replacements but supposedly of good quality) and I have the polarizer along with the lens brush. Probably going to take it down to the wire on the final decision about the extender. I just don&#039;t want to have any regrets once I am there. I am curious though about douglasec&#039;s comment about the memory cards. I am planning to bring 4 new 2gig cards and I will also have a few more that have dispensible photos on them - my question is about &quot;formatting&quot; the cards.  I have actually never done that before. It never seemed necessary. Is there a reason/advantage?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much for all the great info and advice. I have been trying to get through all the features by reading the manual but there&#8217;s nothing like in the field training. Would prefer not to be learning in Africa so I have taking photos everyday and may even take a trip to the Central Park Zoo just for more practice.  The various features of this camera will keep me busy for a long time (i have not read anything about that self leveling feature &#8211; something I really need &#8211; that fabulous!)  I&#8217;ve already gotten 2 extra batteries (replacements but supposedly of good quality) and I have the polarizer along with the lens brush. Probably going to take it down to the wire on the final decision about the extender. I just don&#8217;t want to have any regrets once I am there. I am curious though about douglasec&#8217;s comment about the memory cards. I am planning to bring 4 new 2gig cards and I will also have a few more that have dispensible photos on them &#8211; my question is about &#8220;formatting&#8221; the cards.  I have actually never done that before. It never seemed necessary. Is there a reason/advantage?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: douglasec</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/digital-slr-vs-digital-super-zoom-cameras-on-safari/comment-page-1#comment-50622</link>
		<dc:creator>douglasec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 08:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=3308#comment-50622</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s an impressive page showing the teleconverters (30x!), and sometimes if you need one of those lens adapters (like I do on my Canon) it also gives you a place to thread on filters and also keeps the dust out of the extending lens assembly (big problem on some Canons, anyway - error E13). Better get used to holding your breath and using that beanbag (or tripod if you&#039;re lucky) except in full daylight, if you&#039;re using 30x much. Burst mode can be good here, too, to make sure you get at least one sharp shot, and I set my camera on &quot;stabilize on shoot&quot; instead of constant IS - seems to stabilize better on the Canons, anyway. I had always historically tried to avoid teleconverters and tele-extenders, because in my antediluvian days they sacrificed edge contrast and sharpness and often a stop or more of exposure as well. Maybe all that has now been overcome (I hope), but it might be worth looking for a lens test on ANY extra optics you&#039;re thinking of adding, not to mention the camera&#039;s built-in lens (though you don&#039;t have any real options there, it can at least alert you to your lens&#039; strengths and weaknesses; for instance, if it&#039;s sharpest at f8, you could try to use aperture priority to keep it there as much as possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an impressive page showing the teleconverters (30x!), and sometimes if you need one of those lens adapters (like I do on my Canon) it also gives you a place to thread on filters and also keeps the dust out of the extending lens assembly (big problem on some Canons, anyway &#8211; error E13). Better get used to holding your breath and using that beanbag (or tripod if you&#8217;re lucky) except in full daylight, if you&#8217;re using 30x much. Burst mode can be good here, too, to make sure you get at least one sharp shot, and I set my camera on &#8220;stabilize on shoot&#8221; instead of constant IS &#8211; seems to stabilize better on the Canons, anyway. I had always historically tried to avoid teleconverters and tele-extenders, because in my antediluvian days they sacrificed edge contrast and sharpness and often a stop or more of exposure as well. Maybe all that has now been overcome (I hope), but it might be worth looking for a lens test on ANY extra optics you&#8217;re thinking of adding, not to mention the camera&#8217;s built-in lens (though you don&#8217;t have any real options there, it can at least alert you to your lens&#8217; strengths and weaknesses; for instance, if it&#8217;s sharpest at f8, you could try to use aperture priority to keep it there as much as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/digital-slr-vs-digital-super-zoom-cameras-on-safari/comment-page-1#comment-50611</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 05:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=3308#comment-50611</guid>
		<description>Lorraine,

I recently bought the Olympus 1.7x Tele Conversion Lens (TCON-17) for my Panasonic - which not only works great but is cheaper than the Panasonic version.

I have written an article on it with some sample photos that I recently took whilst on Safari in Zimbabwe that you may wish to look at here:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.safari-guide.co.uk/panasonic-telephoto-conversion-lens.php&quot; title=&quot;Telephoto Conversion Lenses for the Panasonic DMC-FZ28 Digital Camera&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Telephoto Conversion Lenses for the Panasonic DMC-FZ28 Digital Camera&lt;/a&gt;

I hope this helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lorraine,</p>
<p>I recently bought the Olympus 1.7x Tele Conversion Lens (TCON-17) for my Panasonic &#8211; which not only works great but is cheaper than the Panasonic version.</p>
<p>I have written an article on it with some sample photos that I recently took whilst on Safari in Zimbabwe that you may wish to look at here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.safari-guide.co.uk/panasonic-telephoto-conversion-lens.php" title="Telephoto Conversion Lenses for the Panasonic DMC-FZ28 Digital Camera" rel="nofollow">Telephoto Conversion Lenses for the Panasonic DMC-FZ28 Digital Camera</a></p>
<p>I hope this helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: douglasec</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/digital-slr-vs-digital-super-zoom-cameras-on-safari/comment-page-1#comment-50603</link>
		<dc:creator>douglasec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 01:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=3308#comment-50603</guid>
		<description>Frankly, the FZ28 should be a GREAT camera for safari WITHOUT an extender, and especially an off-brand one which might compromise the very good quality of the built-in lens. You&#039;d be much better off just framing in as close as you can (18x will hardly ever be too little!) and doing a crop in Photoshop (or Elements or Picasa or Lightroom or iPhoto or Aperture) as necessary after the fact. Since you have that 18X zoom AND you can do 30fps HD video if I recall correctly, you might not even need a camcorder for those action moments (I&#039;d bring LOTS of memory cards if you do, however, and remember to format EACH of them in your camera before use). Check the online reviews for how the noise increases at higher ISO speeds and keep that in mind when choosing exposures. As I mentioned in an earlier post, many camps get you close enough where even a superzoom is actually more than you&#039;ll need for most shots, so check by email with them before you leave and prepare accordingly. And the FZ28 has pretty great wide angle capability compared to most superzooms for those &quot;up close and TOO personal&quot; moments. Extra batteries are a must, check online at Amazon or even eBay as well as the usual camera sites and you should be able to track some down, and remember to check on your camp&#039;s policies on game drives and AC availability. You can get hundreds of shots (more without flash and if you turn off your display when you can) so one spare each day is usually sufficient. And get ready to use burst mode and video mode on that little wonder - no time for reading the manual in the Land Rover when the time comes! Keep tthe backup batteries charged as possible; i found some charge fine but self-discharge a LOT faster than I&#039;d like, so even if it was charged before you left for the trip, don&#039;t make any assumptions that it still has a full charge if you don&#039;t top it up along the way. Your camera even has &quot;self-leveling&quot; of the images so you don&#039;t have to watch the horizon as carefully when you&#039;re being charged by that elephant! A great small versatile camera choice for safari (remember to check lens cleanliness often and have a lens brush in all that dust, though, or a 1A filter or polarizer if it takes filters).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly, the FZ28 should be a GREAT camera for safari WITHOUT an extender, and especially an off-brand one which might compromise the very good quality of the built-in lens. You&#8217;d be much better off just framing in as close as you can (18x will hardly ever be too little!) and doing a crop in Photoshop (or Elements or Picasa or Lightroom or iPhoto or Aperture) as necessary after the fact. Since you have that 18X zoom AND you can do 30fps HD video if I recall correctly, you might not even need a camcorder for those action moments (I&#8217;d bring LOTS of memory cards if you do, however, and remember to format EACH of them in your camera before use). Check the online reviews for how the noise increases at higher ISO speeds and keep that in mind when choosing exposures. As I mentioned in an earlier post, many camps get you close enough where even a superzoom is actually more than you&#8217;ll need for most shots, so check by email with them before you leave and prepare accordingly. And the FZ28 has pretty great wide angle capability compared to most superzooms for those &#8220;up close and TOO personal&#8221; moments. Extra batteries are a must, check online at Amazon or even eBay as well as the usual camera sites and you should be able to track some down, and remember to check on your camp&#8217;s policies on game drives and AC availability. You can get hundreds of shots (more without flash and if you turn off your display when you can) so one spare each day is usually sufficient. And get ready to use burst mode and video mode on that little wonder &#8211; no time for reading the manual in the Land Rover when the time comes! Keep tthe backup batteries charged as possible; i found some charge fine but self-discharge a LOT faster than I&#8217;d like, so even if it was charged before you left for the trip, don&#8217;t make any assumptions that it still has a full charge if you don&#8217;t top it up along the way. Your camera even has &#8220;self-leveling&#8221; of the images so you don&#8217;t have to watch the horizon as carefully when you&#8217;re being charged by that elephant! A great small versatile camera choice for safari (remember to check lens cleanliness often and have a lens brush in all that dust, though, or a 1A filter or polarizer if it takes filters).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorraine</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/digital-slr-vs-digital-super-zoom-cameras-on-safari/comment-page-1#comment-50574</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorraine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 16:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/?p=3308#comment-50574</guid>
		<description>This is such great news since my friend and I both just purchased a Lumix fz28 for our African Safari at the end of May 2009. Unfortunately, we are having trouble (understatement) purchasing the 1.7x extender - it seems Panasonic has it on back order and NO ONE has it in stock either in New York City or anywhere on the web!!!  Even the proprietary batteries (we bought 2 extra generic) are out of stock everywhere - (I called Panasonic and complained to no avail). We are praying someone will get this equipment in before we leave - although without having much time to play with the lens who knows if it will be worth it.   I am crazy into photography and this is a huge dissappointment to me.  One website recommeded a Rayox 2.2x lens they say is compatible but I never heard of it or this company so I was afraid to take a chance. What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is such great news since my friend and I both just purchased a Lumix fz28 for our African Safari at the end of May 2009. Unfortunately, we are having trouble (understatement) purchasing the 1.7x extender &#8211; it seems Panasonic has it on back order and NO ONE has it in stock either in New York City or anywhere on the web!!!  Even the proprietary batteries (we bought 2 extra generic) are out of stock everywhere &#8211; (I called Panasonic and complained to no avail). We are praying someone will get this equipment in before we leave &#8211; although without having much time to play with the lens who knows if it will be worth it.   I am crazy into photography and this is a huge dissappointment to me.  One website recommeded a Rayox 2.2x lens they say is compatible but I never heard of it or this company so I was afraid to take a chance. What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
