<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Creating Moods with the Kelvin Scale</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digital-photography-school.com/creating-moods-with-the-kelvin-scale/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/creating-moods-with-the-kelvin-scale</link>
	<description>Discover how to use your digital camera with our Digital Photography Tips. We are a community of photographers of all experience levels who come together to learn, share and grow in our understanding of photography.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:14:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/creating-moods-with-the-kelvin-scale/comment-page-1#comment-72581</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 06:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/creating-moods-with-the-kelvin-scale/#comment-72581</guid>
		<description>great blog for those that have not yet or have forgotten there K scale settings however a mistake in your writing was found

The Kelvin Scale ranges from 2000 … 10000  (correction[The Kelvin Scale ranges from 0- ? ]) the use of Kelvin in color temp and in Noise still hold the 0- to infinite ranks although we cannot see 200k light or after 25,000K our vision of it begins to disappear it is still there and can still affect cameras both film and digital to some degree

btw its 275K outside where im at =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great blog for those that have not yet or have forgotten there K scale settings however a mistake in your writing was found</p>
<p>The Kelvin Scale ranges from 2000 … 10000  (correction[The Kelvin Scale ranges from 0- ? ]) the use of Kelvin in color temp and in Noise still hold the 0- to infinite ranks although we cannot see 200k light or after 25,000K our vision of it begins to disappear it is still there and can still affect cameras both film and digital to some degree</p>
<p>btw its 275K outside where im at =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ana</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/creating-moods-with-the-kelvin-scale/comment-page-1#comment-48250</link>
		<dc:creator>Ana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 18:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/creating-moods-with-the-kelvin-scale/#comment-48250</guid>
		<description>EXCELLENT tips!! I think I found one of the missing secrets to those supersaturated &quot;ice blue&quot; and &quot;sunset red&quot;... can&#039;t wait to try these out.



DPS, you guys rock!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EXCELLENT tips!! I think I found one of the missing secrets to those supersaturated &#8220;ice blue&#8221; and &#8220;sunset red&#8221;&#8230; can&#8217;t wait to try these out.</p>
<p>DPS, you guys rock!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nils</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/creating-moods-with-the-kelvin-scale/comment-page-1#comment-36467</link>
		<dc:creator>nils</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/creating-moods-with-the-kelvin-scale/#comment-36467</guid>
		<description>Bought a D200 last week. I really love the kelvin setting possibility!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bought a D200 last week. I really love the kelvin setting possibility!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Genghis2510</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/creating-moods-with-the-kelvin-scale/comment-page-1#comment-33047</link>
		<dc:creator>Genghis2510</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 17:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/creating-moods-with-the-kelvin-scale/#comment-33047</guid>
		<description>Any photography tip is worthwhile exploring. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any photography tip is worthwhile exploring. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/creating-moods-with-the-kelvin-scale/comment-page-1#comment-32986</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 02:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/creating-moods-with-the-kelvin-scale/#comment-32986</guid>
		<description>Great tip!  I tried it tonight on the sunset.  Amazing, simply amazing.  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great tip!  I tried it tonight on the sunset.  Amazing, simply amazing.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunnyman</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/creating-moods-with-the-kelvin-scale/comment-page-1#comment-32972</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunnyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 12:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/creating-moods-with-the-kelvin-scale/#comment-32972</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d have liked to edit my prevoius post, but here goes: 
What the author is trying to say is that you can, for instance, &quot;fool&quot; the camera to make the image look warmer by telling it the light is very bluish, ie. high up on the Kelvin scale. The camera will then try to compensate by adding more red to the image.
I guess this feature is not found on the cheaper digicams, they may have simpler settings like &quot;cloudy&quot; etc.

In my experience, if you get the color balance totally off by having the image shot with the wrong color balance, it is then very difficult to get it right even in an advanced image editing program like Photoshop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d have liked to edit my prevoius post, but here goes:<br />
What the author is trying to say is that you can, for instance, &#8220;fool&#8221; the camera to make the image look warmer by telling it the light is very bluish, ie. high up on the Kelvin scale. The camera will then try to compensate by adding more red to the image.<br />
I guess this feature is not found on the cheaper digicams, they may have simpler settings like &#8220;cloudy&#8221; etc.</p>
<p>In my experience, if you get the color balance totally off by having the image shot with the wrong color balance, it is then very difficult to get it right even in an advanced image editing program like Photoshop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunnyman</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/creating-moods-with-the-kelvin-scale/comment-page-1#comment-32971</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunnyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 12:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/creating-moods-with-the-kelvin-scale/#comment-32971</guid>
		<description>As said above, this was kind of a confusing article, since it in the beginning says the Kelvin scale goes from bluish to reddish when in fact it is the opposite - low end = reddish, as in candle light; high end = bluish, as in noontime sunlight. This is stated correctly later in the text, but the contradiction is likely to confuse.
 
FYI: the Kelvin scale is identical to the Centigrade scale; expt. it has its zero point at Absolute Zero (about -273 degrees Centigrade), instead of at the freezing point of water!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As said above, this was kind of a confusing article, since it in the beginning says the Kelvin scale goes from bluish to reddish when in fact it is the opposite &#8211; low end = reddish, as in candle light; high end = bluish, as in noontime sunlight. This is stated correctly later in the text, but the contradiction is likely to confuse.</p>
<p>FYI: the Kelvin scale is identical to the Centigrade scale; expt. it has its zero point at Absolute Zero (about -273 degrees Centigrade), instead of at the freezing point of water!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Les Smith</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/creating-moods-with-the-kelvin-scale/comment-page-1#comment-32958</link>
		<dc:creator>Les Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 00:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/creating-moods-with-the-kelvin-scale/#comment-32958</guid>
		<description>Sorry people, I got it wrong.  my comments re using the Kelvin settings were for the D80. Can&#039;t comment on the D60 as I don&#039;t have one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry people, I got it wrong.  my comments re using the Kelvin settings were for the D80. Can&#8217;t comment on the D60 as I don&#8217;t have one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NormMonkey</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/creating-moods-with-the-kelvin-scale/comment-page-1#comment-32951</link>
		<dc:creator>NormMonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 18:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/creating-moods-with-the-kelvin-scale/#comment-32951</guid>
		<description>Regarding the RAW vs. in-camera war that&#039;s cropped up here:

Both are right!  

Setting the whitebalance in-camera saves time AND is good practise (learning to do it right vs. fixing it later).

Using RAW *does* give you more control, AND an opportunity to correct mistakes - or get creative - later, without degrading quality.

What does this mean to us when we&#039;re behind the camera?  

Take advantage of BOTH by shooting RAW *AND* setting the white-balance properly.  The camera saves the WB setting in its RAW metadata; any decent RAW interpreter lets you use the camera-chosen WB in addition to setting it by some other means (e.g. auto-setting, choosing your own setting manually, picking a region to interpret as white).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the RAW vs. in-camera war that&#8217;s cropped up here:</p>
<p>Both are right!  </p>
<p>Setting the whitebalance in-camera saves time AND is good practise (learning to do it right vs. fixing it later).</p>
<p>Using RAW *does* give you more control, AND an opportunity to correct mistakes &#8211; or get creative &#8211; later, without degrading quality.</p>
<p>What does this mean to us when we&#8217;re behind the camera?  </p>
<p>Take advantage of BOTH by shooting RAW *AND* setting the white-balance properly.  The camera saves the WB setting in its RAW metadata; any decent RAW interpreter lets you use the camera-chosen WB in addition to setting it by some other means (e.g. auto-setting, choosing your own setting manually, picking a region to interpret as white).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/creating-moods-with-the-kelvin-scale/comment-page-1#comment-32946</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/creating-moods-with-the-kelvin-scale/#comment-32946</guid>
		<description>By the way, Anthony, look up &quot;color temperature&quot; in Wikipedia and you&#039;ll get a techy explanation of how kelvins (for color temperature) relate to black body radiation.  Even Planck&#039;s constant gets a look-in !

Just too techy for me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, Anthony, look up &#8220;color temperature&#8221; in Wikipedia and you&#8217;ll get a techy explanation of how kelvins (for color temperature) relate to black body radiation.  Even Planck&#8217;s constant gets a look-in !</p>
<p>Just too techy for me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
