15 Stunning Images Using Blur to Portray Movement
Photo by Mr Bones - No exposure settings supplied
Today, as a followup to our post earlier in the week A Beginners Guide to Capturing Motion in Your Photography I want to post a series of posts from Flickr that all illustrate a variation on the same theme – movement.
The following shots are all of moving subjects where the photographer has made the choice to set their camera to capture the movement as blur rather than freezing it. This is in all cases by choosing (or letting the camera choose) a ‘slow’ shutter speed (although by slow you’ll see that the speeds (noted under each image) vary from anything from 1/30 second to up to 40 minutes).
Photo by Ben McLeod – Shutter Speed – 8 seconds
Photo by zane&inzane - Exposure Time – 10 minutes
Photo by PhotoToasty – Composition of 3 images at shutter speeds of between 1.6 seconds and 25 seconds
Photo by Heidi Morton - Taken with a Blackberry! (awesome huh!)
Photo by Sara Heinrichs – Exposure Time: 20 seconds
Photo by Mace2000 – 50 second exposure time
Photo by WisDoc – Shutter Speed – 1/30
Photo by Mace2000 – Shutter Speed – 50 seconds
Photo by Wam Mosely – Shutter speed – 4/5 of a second
Photo by Mace2000 – Exposure Time – 43 seconds
Photo by jon madison – Exposure – photographer estimates somewhere between 30-40 minutes
Photo by thorinside – Shutter Speed – 13 seconds
Photo by tschnitzlein – No Exposure information given
For more tips like this subscribe to Digital Photography.
Got some shots to share that use a slow shutter speed and capture movement? Share them with us at the DPS Forums in the Share Your Shots section.




152 Responses to “15 Stunning Images Using Blur to Portray Movement” - Add Yours
August 21st, 2007 at 12:59 am
Those are really great!
I really like the ‘Mace2000′ one!
August 21st, 2007 at 2:25 am
Sara Heinrich’s photo is excellent!
August 21st, 2007 at 3:22 am
Some of the images are brilliant.
My picks:
zane&inzane
Mace2000
August 21st, 2007 at 3:28 am
Okay, so this is probably a dumb question, but I’m a serious newby, so give me a break. When using slow shutter speeds during the day, how is that these photographs aren’t extremely over-exposed? When you adjust the shutter speed to this amount, what else do you change to properly expose your photo?
August 21st, 2007 at 3:55 am
I’ve found a good easy and fun way to get motion shots is to stand in the middle of a moving merry go round and take someone/something’s photo that is also on the merry go round. You get a goos still shot int he middle with a moving background. I suspect the first shot uses this method or something similar.
August 21st, 2007 at 4:49 am
OK, I’m giving up photography right now – I’ll never be able to do anything like that! Joking aside, what an absolutely stunning collection of photos.
August 21st, 2007 at 6:17 am
I would have never thought to use the “slow” shutter speed to achieve some of the effects that they do. Now I’ve really got to get that darn tripod so I can test some of that out.
August 21st, 2007 at 7:28 am
Greg – good question and one I’ll cover in the next ‘how to’ tutorial on this very topic.
But one of the things that some of them use is a filter called an ND (neutral density) filter which is like putting sunglasses on your camera (so less light gets in).
August 21st, 2007 at 9:35 am
Great post! It’s really inspiring to see such a wide range of photos showcasing a particular technique – I’m going to try for a wind-blown-clouds shot.
August 21st, 2007 at 10:12 am
The top image looks more like a pan – not necessarily a shot with a very slow shutter speed?
August 21st, 2007 at 11:59 am
You’re right Bec – but it’s still ‘slow’ as relative to the speed of the movement in the shot – thus creating the feeling of movement via blur….
August 21st, 2007 at 4:41 pm
Hey Greg,
Im quite a newbie too but this is what i do when i want to slow down the shutter in a bright environment, just increase the aperture.
WisDoc and Ben McLeod’s pictures are awesome!
Ben for managing to hold his camera that still in a car and Wisdoc for moving his camera fast enough to get an *almost* sharp image.
Kudos guys.
August 21st, 2007 at 8:17 pm
Thanks for showcasing my image (teddy bear) here! I was wondering where all the recent hits came from. Since Photoshop ate the EXIF data and some expressed interest in the technical process/settings I’ll try to answer here.
This was taken early evening in a fairly shaded area.
27mm effective focal length
f22
0.5 sec exposure
polarizing filter (reduces the light another stop or so; don’t have an ND filter)
Set up the camera on the opposite seat, focus, self timer and a good push of the merry-go-round. Off they go. Repeat till you get something you like. Just secure your camera in some way so it doesn’t fly off of the seat.
August 21st, 2007 at 11:20 pm
Excellent shots, thanks MrBones for the explanation
August 21st, 2007 at 11:42 pm
I loved the Dog’s photo. Excellent Panning. I am an amateur but think thats the toughest technically among the all.
Great shots, loved this post
August 22nd, 2007 at 6:14 am
Congrats!
Very nice photos and great ideas to try.
August 22nd, 2007 at 6:25 am
Thanks for showing my pictures here!
August 24th, 2007 at 2:53 pm
WOW what great pictures, it’s the kind of pictures that really take me somewhere else, I really hope I can get shots like the ones here!
August 26th, 2007 at 1:43 am
I’m with Greg (a newbie also). Mace2000 had a 43 sec exposure…why is that not totally over exposed?
August 26th, 2007 at 7:20 am
check out this for a car shot
http://mssv.deviantart.com/art/Its-not-a-race-its-a-journey-39406025
August 26th, 2007 at 9:27 am
Wow that´s a great shot Shaun hod did you pull that off? How could you freeze the driver while all the lights outside the car were moving?
August 26th, 2007 at 9:52 pm
Really inspiring shots indeed… now let’s try this by ourself =)
August 27th, 2007 at 7:02 am
Just to let you know that someone’s stolen your post.
It’s been reprinted here: http://weirdworldstuff.blogspot.com/2007/08/stunning-images-using-blur-to-portray.html
August 30th, 2007 at 9:08 am
@pinguy: thanks for the hint. seems like the site is off now.
August 30th, 2007 at 10:39 am
thanks pinguy – I saw it last night too and emailed them to get them to remove it. Seems it worked.
August 31st, 2007 at 5:09 pm
wow..those are amazing shots! especially the one by Amnemona – how would you get such a shot? i’m quite new to photography…but it seems like that one will need a slightly diff technique to the other photos??
also, is it possible to ‘set up’ for shots like this using simple point and shoot cameras? the only settings i can find on my camera (Nikon Coolpix 4100) is exposure (ranging -2.0 ~ +2.0)…the only time I managed to get a moving shot was when i was on a merry-go-round, though that was a lucky shot!
September 3rd, 2007 at 12:35 am
Hi pyko, the shot by Amnemona was probably done in a car or any moving thing and a slow shutter speed the reason the do was not completely in focus is probably the wind blowing his hair but if it was a car with no windows open the dog would have been in perfect focus…….although the picture would be less dynamic.
I think my fave of the lot is the Photo by thorinside its beautiful
September 3rd, 2007 at 12:38 am
Could be panning but it doesnt look like it and if it is its a little blurry and badly controlled
September 5th, 2007 at 5:09 am
I thought my pics were nice, capturing speed that way…
http://flickr.com/photos/pomarc/57214038/
http://flickr.com/photos/pomarc/1315574514/
THEN I’ve seen these you show in this post… And I changed my mind!
September 5th, 2007 at 6:17 am
The following shots are all of moving subjects where the photographer has made the choice to set their camera to capture the movement as blur rather than freezing it… Very interesting, thank you.
September 6th, 2007 at 10:58 am
WOW!
Nice pictures!
September 9th, 2007 at 5:42 pm
Answering to Greg’s and Dave’s question:
Those pictures aren’t overexposed because accordingly to shutter increase, aperture value and/or sensitivity (ISO factor) of matrix (in digital cameras) or film (in analogue cameras) was decreased.
September 19th, 2007 at 11:35 pm
That’s very cool
September 21st, 2007 at 6:54 am
I love those dogs
Nice one
November 14th, 2007 at 3:26 pm
I love these. Especially the Doll!
December 3rd, 2007 at 10:21 pm
hay.. i just want to say all of the 15 shot are amazing i have never tried enything like this before BUT…..i have 2 start because it is part of my next project (shutter speed and apature)it looked soooooo funnnn!!!! i have been inspired by your shot and hopefully u guys wont mind me using it for research..^________^thank u……………*_^
January 7th, 2008 at 7:54 am
Just remember, at the most basic level, everything in photography is a balance of just 3 factors:
1) film speed (how quickly the film records the image from light – also affects detail level/saturation – fast film (ISO 1000) absorbs light more quickly than slow film (ISO 100))
2) shutter speed (how long an opening between the subject and the film is made – smaller value = faster shutter = less light)
3) aperture (the size of the opening between the subject and the film – smaller value = small hole between subject and film = higher f-stop = less light = greater focal range – imagine the camera is squinting)
So if you wanted to have a slow shutter speed (more light), you could balance it out by using slower film (light affects it more slowly) and/or small aperture/high f-stop (less light).
Similarly, when you want to have a very fast shutter speed to catch very quick action (less light), you have to balance it out using fast film (light affects it more quickly) and/or large aperture/low f-stop (more light).
Give up your cheap point-and-shoot digital camera and get an SLR, digital or analog. And learn to interpret your light meter!
January 12th, 2008 at 7:22 am
Great work with the images. Love the creativity.
January 18th, 2008 at 2:55 pm
The mind’s eye is a pretty amazing feature of the human spirit. These photos are all poetry the way the blur highlights each subject.
March 7th, 2008 at 10:04 pm
Those pictures are great, and at the moment I have a project with slow shutter speeds. I love the effect the water get when you use the slow shutter speeds! amazing…
when you say composition of 3 images, do you then mean that 3 images were put together into one?
Check out my slow shutter speed pictures:
http://www.madsnorgaard.net/portfolio.html
March 7th, 2008 at 10:14 pm
These pictures are great! when you say “composition of 3 images…” do you then mean that 3 images were put together to form one image?
I have also done some work with slow shutter speeds and panning: http://www.madsnorgaard.net
March 11th, 2008 at 9:07 pm
The one of the dog and the bottom one look suspiciously photoshoped. Maybe someone can set me straight.
March 12th, 2008 at 1:48 am
I don’t think they are photoshoped as you can make those effect by using a slow shutter speed! I don’t know how this image has been done though: http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/blur-movement/
???
June 5th, 2008 at 12:55 am
Great photos and an excellent selection to help get the creative juices flowing.
Thanks
June 25th, 2008 at 1:45 pm
Really nice selection of images… but for me, personally it’s Markal’s shot that steals the show (Japan street setting / last photo). Very nice movement blur and something I haven’t seen before… the other photos are all very nice, just that it’s been done a re-done a million times over.
September 19th, 2008 at 12:28 am
It’s probably been explained, I just haven’t read all the comments.
But the photos with slow shutter speeds aren’t overexposed because of the aperture, also known as the fstop. There is a balance of both of them to get a stunning image.
October 13th, 2008 at 3:19 pm
Fantastic ! especially the circus wheel seems incredible.
November 10th, 2008 at 5:03 am
Very nice collection and stunning work with the camera and colors….let alone the images in this fashion!
November 13th, 2008 at 5:54 pm
I actually managed to do one similar to the second one shown (the car) – totally by accident, naturally, haha.
November 13th, 2008 at 10:36 pm
Wow dude you got to admit that is pretty cool stuff.
jess
http://web-anonymity.vze.com
November 13th, 2008 at 11:10 pm
Can you elaborate on how you obtained permission for usage of these photos from Flickr?
Many of them, including those from Mr.Bones, Mace2000, WisDoc, and Sara Heinrichs, have the Flickr permission settings to “All Rights Reserved”, which means that you may not republish the images without explicit permission from the copyright holder.
Its commonly thought that images on Flickr, on anywhere on the web for that matter, are free for the taking for any purpose.
I’m sensitive to this issue because my images have been stolen many times, so I always watermark them now. Three of my images, in fact, were used without my permission for a commercial restaurant, including their masthead image, and I’m currently preparing an invoice to send them based on research I’ve done on stock image sites like Getty.
November 13th, 2008 at 11:28 pm
Great pictures, seeing these and all the comments on the carnival ride, makes me think folks like my shot at this, available on: http://rocket9.net/page2.htm
Halfway down the page is my panoramic picture of the MD State Fair, at night in the rain. Pano is available at 4900×600 pixels or 9800×1200. Besides the ride blur, plenty of moving people blur. All shot hand-held (though a tripod really woulda made it all easier).
November 13th, 2008 at 11:35 pm
You could have added some shots with explo-zoom technique, otherwise it was complete and interesting!
Seb
November 14th, 2008 at 12:11 am
These are all great examples but I really like waterfall shots.
Here are some I captured this summer.
http://www.petelanglois.net/waterfalls
Pete
November 14th, 2008 at 12:17 am
Achieving movement is pretty easy at night as you can capture the available light. The the day time it’s slightly trickier as you can very easily overexpose the shot. A Neutral Density Filter is a great addition to any camera bag kit as you can achieve longer exposure times and still achieve a correct exposure. I’m yet to buy one but it’s on my Amazon Wishlist
November 14th, 2008 at 12:19 am
Wowee that tree is exquisite. Those images really inspire me.
November 14th, 2008 at 1:14 am
WisDoc’s is amazing – while other shots are more stunningly beautiful, technically, his capture of a running dog is incredible. First, he had to have a dog running flat out fast, then get the right camera angle, setting etc. so he gets my vote for the best.
November 14th, 2008 at 1:22 am
Oh, I really enjoyed those even though I got a little motion sick.
November 14th, 2008 at 1:47 am
i loooooooooooooooooooove Photo by Sara Heinrichs!!!!
it’s toooooooooooo pretty!!!
when i have a dslr i will want to take pix like all of these!!!! yeah!!
November 14th, 2008 at 2:06 am
Photographs of Sarah Heinrichs is really captivating. Well my first choice would be first photo of Mr. Bones. It’s creative enough.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ignoto_someoneski/2981371043/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ignoto_someoneski/2977775210/
November 14th, 2008 at 2:48 am
more story recycling?
November 14th, 2008 at 3:09 am
@ The Floating frog – That’s probably why I was able to get my one in the car.
@ Pete – I really like the waterfalls shots, too. I checked out yours as well, they’re great!
@ Steven – That sucks about the restaurant using your images without permission. I hope you get it sorted out.
November 14th, 2008 at 3:40 am
Wow, it’s so hard to pick a favorite cause they all look really cool, good collection.
November 14th, 2008 at 3:48 am
Really awesome shots. I’m particularly happy to see the shutter speeds listed…great bit of info to have.
Another pretty waterfall picture – http://pa.photoshelter.com/img-show/I0000m6e7iykAlKs
November 14th, 2008 at 4:37 am
Technically, a lot of these weren’t “blurred”. They were shot with long exposure time & either pan / tilt / zoom.
Blur (or a lot of people mistook for background bokeh) has nothing to do with the above shooting techniques. Blur happens when you introduce camera / lens shakes.
November 14th, 2008 at 4:44 am
Those shots are amazing. I love the blur effect especially when used at night. Seeing the trails of tail lights and headlights makes pictures look so cool.
November 14th, 2008 at 8:28 am
The pics are really amazing.. I never thought such beautiful landscape shots (the once with moving clouds) can be taken with long exposure. I need to try it
I have a few shots which shows motion.
Please let me know what do you think.
thanks,
Dinuraj
November 14th, 2008 at 8:30 am
The pics are really amazing.. I never thought such beautiful landscape shots (the once with moving clouds) can be taken with long exposure. I need to try it
I have a few shots which shows motion.
http://flickr.com/photos/kdinuraj/3001091462/
http://flickr.com/photos/kdinuraj/3000252849/
Please let me know what do you think.
thanks,
Dinuraj
November 14th, 2008 at 11:02 am
whoever this is didn’t get permission from myself, that’s for sure.
thanks for the feature, but i’d appreciate if you would at least *ask* before using my photographs.
j.
November 14th, 2008 at 6:20 pm
long exposure photography is really very interest,the photographs which are amazing to me.definitely i will try to shoot some of moving object.
thanks for sending this article, to me it is a opportunity to think and try
regards
srkalvala
November 14th, 2008 at 8:16 pm
Jon – I’ve emailed you. Very sorry about this – I’m a bit confused as to why we used your image when we originally posted this post a year back – but we’ll get to the bottom of it.
November 15th, 2008 at 3:02 am
A couple of the posts implied that using Photoshop to achieve the effect would be “cheating” and I guess I can understand that sentiment. But as better cheater than a photographer, I’d be interested in knowing what filter can be used in PS or Photoshop elements to achieve the same effect (I don’t think the “blur filter” will create the sense of motion that I am looking for.
November 15th, 2008 at 10:45 pm
Wow, there are so many talented photographers out there it is amazing.
November 18th, 2008 at 3:26 am
great selection of motion capture!!! I love them real and not photoshoped, just missing one spinning kid!!!
ouch, reminds me how it hurts!!
November 19th, 2008 at 7:29 am
I love these shots. I’ve recently started to get into photography a lot more and found a love for long exposures.
Here’s one I took a few weeks back. The settings are underneath the pic. Hope you enjoy!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/22613062@N04/3024281208/
November 23rd, 2008 at 6:05 am
Impressive images! Thanks for sharing!
December 14th, 2008 at 6:28 am
it is impossible to dislike theese photos.
January 19th, 2009 at 3:22 pm
wow, cool!! amazing!!
January 23rd, 2009 at 4:34 am
Love this site, you are doing a great job.
Thanks,
JD
February 14th, 2009 at 3:27 am
i like the pictures and also the site.
February 15th, 2009 at 5:46 pm
I find it completely unnecessary to choose a favorite. These images are all exquisite in different ways.
You don’t have to use a fancy camera to achieve this effect. When I was in third grade (in the 1960s) I took a snapshot of my friends while we were on a spinning structure on a playground, which turned out very similar to the teddy bear shot by Mr Bones. I was using a “brownie” type camera – fixed shutter speed, fixed aperture. The key is that I was moving at the same speed as my friends, because I was sitting in the middle of the spinning structure (whatever it’s called). So, in relation to my camera, my friends were perfectly still, while the background spun around us.
February 18th, 2009 at 9:54 pm
I’m glad to find that some people appreciate my photography (markal shot on this page). However, I believe it is customary to ask for permission before using a photograph that has clearly set “All Rights Reserved” in the permissions on the Flickr page. And I see I am not the only one to have a photograph used without being asked first.
March 26th, 2009 at 10:38 am
Mark – as I said in my email to you I’ve removed the image and apologize. I don’t know how it happened as we work hard to keep images used on this site CC licensed. The process we use to get images from Flickr stops us from using all rights reserved images – so I’m confused how this happened.
Any chance you changed your licence sine this was originally published in 2007? That’s the only explanation I can think of.
May 21st, 2009 at 6:11 pm
This images are really stunning. But pls try and analyze it one after the other.
June 5th, 2009 at 8:15 pm
hey darren excellent one !!!!!!!
the magic is due to servoAF (
auto Focus) , isn’t it ?
June 6th, 2009 at 12:13 am
Love this site. Great pictures. I am in the market for a new Canon Portrait lens. Anyone have good suggestions?
July 23rd, 2009 at 11:33 am
the pictures are great.
August 22nd, 2009 at 5:04 am
DAMN I HAVE TRIED THIS THING and I AM REALLY SURPRISED……………………………………YOU KNOW I HAVE NEVER THOGHT OF THAT BUT NOW I HAVE A WHOLE COLLECTION OF THESE TYPE OF IMAGES ….I AM USING A350 SONY….14.2 MEGAPIXEL………….AND ITS GREAT……….
October 2nd, 2009 at 7:13 pm
I wish there was some description on how to take these shots, cse they are amazing!!!!
October 23rd, 2009 at 2:14 am
I have found that 1/15 works well when panning cyclists in motion in relatively normal outside lighting. I don’t know if this also makes sense: I am right handed, and it looks like panning from right to left works better for me. Here are some of my pans (some of them have textures applied to enhance the blur):
http://www.flickr.com/photos/phatcamper/3868275031/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/phatcamper/3855882179/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/phatcamper/3681660819/imghttp://bighugelabs.com/onblack.php?id=4034373689/img
October 27th, 2009 at 9:55 pm
beautiful!
i love every single one of them!
November 13th, 2009 at 4:19 am
Thank you so much for the info and samples on timed exposures, I have been sampling around with these a little lately. I live on a small ranch in Arizona way out of the city and I am enjoying taking these types of photos using them on skyscapes at night and time exposed shots of far away towns. It lets the light get into the lense and allows detail not seen anyother way in dark lighting.
December 2nd, 2009 at 10:31 pm
absolutely beautiful HDR photography, nice panning amazing work man….
January 30th, 2010 at 5:11 pm
i just adore the first pic of the teddy bear, omg. i would put that on my wallllllll.
March 1st, 2010 at 9:49 am
these are some great photos i espically like the one with the frog, thats is that guys hat near the moon if you know what i mean. i like eating cheese
March 3rd, 2010 at 6:18 am
Great post. Just another reason for me to get out my trusty tripod!
http://grtaylor2.com/2010/01/when-to-use-a-tripod/
March 3rd, 2010 at 7:11 am
I was just working on this recently! Very excited to learn more! I love these effects!
The picture I linked to below is by far one of my favorite photos. It was taken by a high school student in Duluth, MN. He used a 45 minute exposure and did light painting using a spotlight. The picture can be seen here:
http://www.johncurleyphotoblog.com/2009/03/howto-you-can-do-this-too.html
March 3rd, 2010 at 7:27 am
these are all so fabulous! i can’t pick a favorite!!
March 3rd, 2010 at 7:33 am
Here is my example…. Took it last sunday in Hongkong. It is quite fascinating how fast taxis drive in Hongkong… Ironically the sign on the street means “Slow down”.
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_QXx9XTf1sb4/S41BnBcmvuI/AAAAAAAAAs0/sEC6i3zZGnY/s1600-h/IMG_9018+%28683×1024%29.jpg
Feel free to comment!
Greetings from China!
Philipp
March 3rd, 2010 at 9:03 am
Although these photos seem familiar, it is great to see them again.
March 3rd, 2010 at 9:24 am
this is one of my favs.
March 3rd, 2010 at 9:26 am
this is one of my favs.
March 3rd, 2010 at 11:06 am
Great collection of images! I like the use of blur effect in photography.
March 3rd, 2010 at 3:02 pm
Here’s one that I did…
March 3rd, 2010 at 3:04 pm
Here’s mine…
March 3rd, 2010 at 4:58 pm
Nice!
March 3rd, 2010 at 9:34 pm
I used long exposures to achieve some blur in these 3 photos:
http://blog.tremblestudio.com/blur
1. Chicago Magnificent Mile: f22 for full depth of field, 1/4 shutter speed. I wanted the bus to be blurry yet distinguishable, hence not such a long exposure. Had to wait probably 10 mins between shots for the next bus and the ight was changing fast!
2. Light streaks: This one in fact is a composition of several photos. Each shot had one or two cars, I layered them (Blending Mode: Lighten) to get these many on just one frame. f22 @ 5 seconds
3. Last one, while walking behind my wife. Camera at chest level, no looking through the viewfinder just shooting constantly. The blur has a nice effect since the window looks frozen at the center then blurs on the Z axis. f14 @ 1/5 (compensated +1.3 stops, the sun was right in front and the normal reading threw everything into shadows)
March 4th, 2010 at 12:31 am
If this is a repeat idea, I apologize. When my daughter was about 6 or 7 years old, we went to the park with some of her friends and eventually ended up on the merry-go-round. By my getting on the merry-go-round with her, she and I were both able to remain relatively “still” while the background was moving behind her. This made for some very interesting pictures using a slower shutter speed.
So many of the other motion blur shots require panning with the subject which leads to a “hit or miss” result.With the merry-go-round moving but the two of us still relative to each other, it worked out very well.
dlm
March 4th, 2010 at 2:52 am
Here’s a recent attempt of mine from Feb 28th as seen on my 365 day photo project at oncemany.com
March 4th, 2010 at 7:05 am
Last weekend I’ve taken a shot of a dog like this one.
March 4th, 2010 at 11:56 am
The third photo is my favorite. A very soft look that i really enjoy, plus the black and white caught my eye.
March 4th, 2010 at 3:43 pm
Cool pic! Gotta take something like this in the future
March 5th, 2010 at 3:00 am
with lens open for 30 seconds
March 5th, 2010 at 4:52 am
I took my CRV’s odometer for weekly assignment . After I submitted, I realized I misread the requirement.

March 5th, 2010 at 6:47 am
Going east on the 101freeway @75mph + plane flying west out of Burbank @200mph(I assume) + a tree getting in the way + good timing = cool shot!

…click on it to make it a little bigger.
March 5th, 2010 at 8:01 am
I’ve taken long exposures (45 seconds and more) with my digital camera but there is a lot of graininess (noise) in the image. Is there a way to shoot and eliminate the noise?
March 5th, 2010 at 1:32 pm
I submitted a comment and a photo. Don’t understand why it all disappeared???
March 5th, 2010 at 10:02 pm
when they say the exposure time,, is it the same thing with the shutter speed??thnx^^
March 5th, 2010 at 10:24 pm
Amazing!
Every single image is great!
I specially liked Photo by Mr Bones and Photo by jon madison…
Nice collections!
March 5th, 2010 at 11:42 pm
Absolutely great Photography. Gave me something new to explore.
Mr Bones, Besides the good push of the Merry-Go-Round, how about putting the camera on Self timer?
March 5th, 2010 at 11:53 pm
Third request…please help. How do I find the “actual URL” of my FLICKR photo? I really like the embed process here. I have been unsuccessful in uploading anything here. Am brand newmember.
March 6th, 2010 at 12:02 am
Greg – when you put your shutter speed on 15 or 30 or 60, depending upon the speed of the subject and how much blur you want, you adjust your aperture until your meter reads “correct” (or what you want, under exposed, over exposed). If you cannot get your meter bar to that point, lower your ISO. If your ISO is already as low as it can get ND filter, as Darren suggested. If there is still too much light….wait.
March 6th, 2010 at 12:06 am
Darren – still trying to figure things out….please tell me how I obtain the “actual URL” for my FLICKR photo for this embed process. Also, where do I go to read on your site how photos posted here are copyright protected? This is an incredible newsletter, tutorial, and stimulation…. and I would like to join in on the fun.
March 6th, 2010 at 12:23 am
@Caroline on your Flickr photo, click on the “Share This” button, then on “Grab HTML”
Look out for a piece of code that looks like this:
img src=”http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4002/4381427405_16a8d6449c.jpg”
Copy the URL from within it… in this example, the URL would be http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4002/4381427405_16a8d6449c.jpg
March 6th, 2010 at 3:16 am
These photos are very nice and inspire me to try some new fun things.

I’ve always loved the flowing water photos and over the the last few months played some with zooming while the lens was open, and had some results I was quite pleased with. But just over the past few weeks I’ve been playing with motion blur by moving the camera on a still subject and had some results I’ve really enjoyed. I’m going to try posting one here and see if it works. If it doesn’t and you would like to see it you will find it by clicking here.
March 6th, 2010 at 11:46 am
Being my first day in school, I thought I’d get my feet wet by submitting a B/W photo taken several years ago. I added sepia toning to give it a vintage look. By “panning”, I achieved the effect of motion. I’m open for critique. Happy to be aboard!
March 6th, 2010 at 3:43 pm
Interesting photo, David. Panning definitely gives a feeling of motion. The photo seems a bit flat – m’be because it was taken in direct sunlight. Is this a film photo print that was scanned into a digital file?
March 7th, 2010 at 12:16 am
I like ones that include people and reminds a bit of Monet. See example below.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/cfurini/4400291054/in/set-72157623539543578/
March 10th, 2010 at 9:29 am
A
P
P
L
E
good photo’ssssssssssssssssss
March 11th, 2010 at 2:20 am
Here’s one shot from a 50ft. mast with a pan-tilt head at 1/60th. (It was also four images stitched together.)
I’ll be interested if the image posted to this reply or not.
March 12th, 2010 at 3:33 pm
Awesome shots!
March 13th, 2010 at 3:06 am
Thanks Carman – but that’s strange – I don’t see that my shot posted. Where do you see it?
March 13th, 2010 at 6:25 am
Hamish,
Maybe she wasn’t talking about your shots, maybe she was talking about the ones in the main story.
April 22nd, 2010 at 4:23 am
I really like this collection! I haven’t been able to master the art of panning yet but I’m working on it. I’m very impressed by some of the images
http://www.viewbug.com/member/jchoy
June 4th, 2010 at 6:04 pm
Taken int he moonlight with slow shutter speed. I dont remember the SS, but I know I got excited when I slowed it down, and got this efect- with a Canon 500D.
From Slow Shutter SPeed
August 9th, 2010 at 6:20 am
Amazing photos.. thnx
March 15th, 2011 at 3:08 am
fabulous
April 6th, 2011 at 1:08 am
i like blur
April 6th, 2011 at 1:12 am
May 13th, 2011 at 1:29 pm
There are some amazing shots on here. Mine doesn’t hold a candle, but I will share. This is a picture I took of my mare Georgia one day when she was out romping in the pasture. I was trying to capture power and grace in one shot…
ISO 400; f 5/6; 1/20 sec.
May 15th, 2011 at 5:39 am
These are very excellent photos. I love them. Esther
May 21st, 2011 at 9:48 am
Hiya, my group is just establishing our first website, searching and understanding what is needed. This weblog caught out proper away. I’m fired up about this, and adore the design of your site. Can you let me know what “theme” it is?
June 23rd, 2011 at 5:30 pm
these photos are excellent.
But i have some queries.
How can i take a photo of a moving object?
should i move with the motion or will i wait for a right moment to come or wat?
how the first pic and the dog running was taken?
if u will move then camera shake will happen.
pls clarify.
August 12th, 2011 at 6:58 am
Thank you for including my picture, although this is no simple time exposure. This image wouldn’t possibly have turned out like this had I just made one big huge time exposure. In that case, the background would be almost white.
This is a time panorama, i.e. I used about 100 individual, optimized exposures to capture the traffic lights, the background (road), and the individual light trails, which I shot in one continuous session during one night (I had to do a couple of test sessions for this before …). I compiled them together in Photoshop using lots of individual masks. The overall photoshop work time for this image must have been somewhere around 20 hours.
November 2nd, 2011 at 3:18 am
@Greg – You would adjust your ISO if you can’t manually adjust your shutter speed.
November 25th, 2011 at 4:17 pm
This is AWESOME! i want to learn EVERYTHING. haha. well…I have a few decades (hopefully) of life to do that. and the above comment about getting on a merry go round…THAT sounds like fun! Ooh Need to try something like this :0)
February 14th, 2012 at 7:44 am
This was a hot weekend, I love talking these sorts of photos
February 14th, 2012 at 7:45 am
This was a hot weekend, I love talking these sorts of photos
http://www.flickr.com/photos/nicksk/4940791243/in/set-72157624779682172/
February 22nd, 2012 at 6:38 am
Check Mine…
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=302023519858957&set=a.302023503192292.71154.153917001336277&type=1&ref=nf
February 29th, 2012 at 1:12 pm
nice photos..
and here is mine : http://www.flickr.com/photos/imamtho/6579986299/in/set-72157628585689383/
March 9th, 2012 at 8:49 pm
First pic is my favorite. =)
April 26th, 2012 at 2:01 am
Great examples. It’s hard to find anything as exciting as night long exposure photography
Leave a Reply