<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alternative Nikon Kit Lenses &#8211; Review Results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digital-photography-school.com/alternative-nikon-kit-lenses-review-results/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/alternative-nikon-kit-lenses-review-results</link>
	<description>Discover how to use your digital camera with our Digital Photography Tips. We are a community of photographers of all experience levels who come together to learn, share and grow in our understanding of photography.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:28:06 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve B.</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/alternative-nikon-kit-lenses-review-results/comment-page-1#comment-24428</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/alternative-nikon-kit-lenses-review-results/#comment-24428</guid>
		<description>I have the 18-200 VR and other than the weight, there is no downside to this wonderful lens. However I plan on taking alot of landscape photography this year and have been agonizing over whether it is worth buying the 12-24mm which is pricey and means adding something else to carry. Does anyone have any thoughts on this? Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the 18-200 VR and other than the weight, there is no downside to this wonderful lens. However I plan on taking alot of landscape photography this year and have been agonizing over whether it is worth buying the 12-24mm which is pricey and means adding something else to carry. Does anyone have any thoughts on this? Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chike Nwobu</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/alternative-nikon-kit-lenses-review-results/comment-page-1#comment-18194</link>
		<dc:creator>Chike Nwobu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 20:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/alternative-nikon-kit-lenses-review-results/#comment-18194</guid>
		<description>I have the 18-55, 55-200 set, just purchased the 18-200vr. to stop the act of swaping lenses, i miss good shots doing that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the 18-55, 55-200 set, just purchased the 18-200vr. to stop the act of swaping lenses, i miss good shots doing that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wayne west</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/alternative-nikon-kit-lenses-review-results/comment-page-1#comment-17971</link>
		<dc:creator>wayne west</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 01:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/alternative-nikon-kit-lenses-review-results/#comment-17971</guid>
		<description>the great 70-300mm vr is not #1???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the great 70-300mm vr is not #1???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scoop</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/alternative-nikon-kit-lenses-review-results/comment-page-1#comment-17969</link>
		<dc:creator>Scoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/alternative-nikon-kit-lenses-review-results/#comment-17969</guid>
		<description>We have a Nikon D50 and D40 and the kit lenses that came with them, we also have a Sigma 28-300mm and a new Nikon 18-135mm, I love this lens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have a Nikon D50 and D40 and the kit lenses that came with them, we also have a Sigma 28-300mm and a new Nikon 18-135mm, I love this lens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cams</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/alternative-nikon-kit-lenses-review-results/comment-page-1#comment-17966</link>
		<dc:creator>Cams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/alternative-nikon-kit-lenses-review-results/#comment-17966</guid>
		<description>I got the 18-70mm with my D70s and the only lens I&#039;ve bought since is a 50mm f/1.8. I like the results of the kit lens but do find it too short on many occasions. I thought I would go for a 70-200 VR but the cost is to high for me, so it may very well be that I&#039;ll end up getting the 18-200 VR, which will kind of make the kit lens redundant. Since I couldn&#039;t decide coming through the duty free at the airport this week, I got an SB-800 instead. 

Nice review and I&#039;m sure that I shall revisit it when I&#039;m in shopping mode. 

BTW, to the author: watch out for those rogue apostrophes; &quot;it&#039;s&quot; is ALWAYS a contraction of &quot;it is&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got the 18-70mm with my D70s and the only lens I&#8217;ve bought since is a 50mm f/1.8. I like the results of the kit lens but do find it too short on many occasions. I thought I would go for a 70-200 VR but the cost is to high for me, so it may very well be that I&#8217;ll end up getting the 18-200 VR, which will kind of make the kit lens redundant. Since I couldn&#8217;t decide coming through the duty free at the airport this week, I got an SB-800 instead. </p>
<p>Nice review and I&#8217;m sure that I shall revisit it when I&#8217;m in shopping mode. </p>
<p>BTW, to the author: watch out for those rogue apostrophes; &#8220;it&#8217;s&#8221; is ALWAYS a contraction of &#8220;it is&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Puplet</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/alternative-nikon-kit-lenses-review-results/comment-page-1#comment-17965</link>
		<dc:creator>Puplet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/alternative-nikon-kit-lenses-review-results/#comment-17965</guid>
		<description>What about the Nikkor 17-55mm f2.8? Perhaps too expensive for some but a worthy replacement kit lens nonetheless.  My brother has this lens - and I rate it as highly as my own Olympus 14-54mm f2.8-3.5 - which *did* come as part of a kit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the Nikkor 17-55mm f2.8? Perhaps too expensive for some but a worthy replacement kit lens nonetheless.  My brother has this lens &#8211; and I rate it as highly as my own Olympus 14-54mm f2.8-3.5 &#8211; which *did* come as part of a kit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZÃ© Maria</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/alternative-nikon-kit-lenses-review-results/comment-page-1#comment-17962</link>
		<dc:creator>ZÃ© Maria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 09:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/alternative-nikon-kit-lenses-review-results/#comment-17962</guid>
		<description>I bought my D80 with the 18-70 lens and I am quite pleased with its overall quality. I only wish it was a little faster and had a little less distortion when zoom wide open.
I think it is perfectly sharp and very solid for a kit lens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought my D80 with the 18-70 lens and I am quite pleased with its overall quality. I only wish it was a little faster and had a little less distortion when zoom wide open.<br />
I think it is perfectly sharp and very solid for a kit lens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jollence</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/alternative-nikon-kit-lenses-review-results/comment-page-1#comment-17956</link>
		<dc:creator>Jollence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 23:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/alternative-nikon-kit-lenses-review-results/#comment-17956</guid>
		<description>I had the 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 for my D80, doesn&#039;t have VR tho but I manage to get a lot of good shot from that lens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 for my D80, doesn&#8217;t have VR tho but I manage to get a lot of good shot from that lens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/alternative-nikon-kit-lenses-review-results/comment-page-1#comment-17955</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/alternative-nikon-kit-lenses-review-results/#comment-17955</guid>
		<description>I wonder why the 17-55 f/2.8 didn&#039;t make the list?  I love this lense and use it all the time.  Totally solid construction, no wacky glass obscuring issues and its f/2.8 the whole way!  Great for just about anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder why the 17-55 f/2.8 didn&#8217;t make the list?  I love this lense and use it all the time.  Totally solid construction, no wacky glass obscuring issues and its f/2.8 the whole way!  Great for just about anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://digital-photography-school.com/alternative-nikon-kit-lenses-review-results/comment-page-1#comment-17954</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 21:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/alternative-nikon-kit-lenses-review-results/#comment-17954</guid>
		<description>When I bought the D70, the 18-70mm (officially the 18-70mm AF-S DX f/3.5-4.5G, unless that&#039;s a different lens) was the kit lens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I bought the D70, the 18-70mm (officially the 18-70mm AF-S DX f/3.5-4.5G, unless that&#8217;s a different lens) was the kit lens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
